The USS Nimitz UFO incident refers to. a 2004
radar-visual encounter of an unidentified flying object. by US fighter pilots of the
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group. In December 2017. infrared footage of the encounter was released
to the public. The encounter also included an engagement with the UFO. by the Commander
of the squadron, VFA-41. interviews with one of the pilots. and subsequent news reports.
describe the sighting of an “unidentified flying object”. by six Navy Super Hornet fighter
jets. over the Pacific Ocean in November, 2004. According to The Washington Post. the
video was released by former intelligence officer Luis Elizondo. to shed light on a
secretive Department of Defense operation. to analyze reported UFO sightings. the Advanced
Aerospace Threat Identification Program. Numerous FOIAs were submitted regarding this event.
There was a FOIA obtained that indicated four Marine Lt Colonels. and a Marine Major were
aware of the event. and had witnessed the IR video of the unknown object. A number of
documents were leaked to the internet. with varied levels of credibility. Acceleration
values for the performance characteristics of the object. were made using statements.
from the USS Princeton radar operators. the F A-18 pilots that saw the object disappear
within a second. and acceleration values based on the IR video.
The Navy has now updated their protocols for pilots. to report UFO sightings in an effort.
to reduce the stigma associated with such reports. Skeptics have called into question
the veracity of the pilots’ accounts. pointing out that the sighting could be explained by
equipment malfunction. or human error. On his part one of the witnesses. retired navy
commander David Fravor. lamented the amount “of misinformation that was starting to come
out. through third and fourth parties” during a June 2018 interview. Prior to the incident,
early November 2004. the Ticonderoga-class guided missile cruiser USS Princeton. part
of Carrier Strike Group 11. had been tracking mysterious aircraft intermittently. for two
weeks on an advanced passive radar. Navy Chief Petty Officer Kevin Day. stationed on Princeton.
recalls that he first noticed the clear radar traces. of eight to ten objects around 10
November. They were travelling southwards in a loose though fixed formation. at 28,000
feet (8,500 m) in the immediate vicinity of Catalina Island. He was startled by their
slow speed of 100 knots. (190 km/h; 120 mph). but received confirmation of their presence
from radar operators on other vessels. Regular observations were made of a similar number
of objects. over the following six days. The objects were also faintly detected by an E-2C
Hawkeye plane. after Princeton sent them coordinates. When the same event occurred again around
9:30 PST. on 14 November 2004. an operations officer aboard Princeton. contacted two airborne
U.S. Navy Boeing F A-18E F Super Hornets. from USS Nimitz. flying a combat exercise
at the time. The aircraft were two-seat variants. and each pilot was accompanied by a weapon
systems officer (W S O). The lead Super Hornet was piloted by Commander David Fravor. commanding
officer of Strike Fighter Squadron 41. The second fighter, flying as wingman. included
Lieutenant Commander Jim Slaight as one of the two officers aboard. Princeton’s radio
operator, Kevin Day. directly instructed the pilots to change their course. and investigate
the unidentified radar spot observed by Princeton’s own radar. This was done to determine if the
objects posed any collision danger. to an upcoming air defense exercise. A radio operator
on Princeton however asked the pilots. if they were carrying operational weapons. and
the pilots replied that they were not. The weather conditions for that day. showed excellent
visibility with a blue sky. no cloud cover, and a calm sea.
When the jet fighters arrived on site. the crew of four saw nothing in the air nor on
their radar. On Princeton’s radar however. it was noticed that the object now. dropped
from 28,000 ft to near sea level in less than a second. As the pilots looked down at the
sea. they noticed a turbulent oval area of churning water with foam. and frothy waves
“the size of a Boeing 737 airplane”. with a smoother area of lighter color at the center.
as if the waves were breaking over something just under the surface. A few seconds later.
they noticed an unusual object hovering with erratic movements. 50 feet (15 m) above the
churning water. Both Fravor and Slaight later described the object. as a large bright white
Tic Tac 30 to 46 feet (9.1 to 14.0 m) long. with no windshield nor porthole. no wing nor
empennage. and no visible engine nor exhaust plume. Fravor began a circular descent to
approach the object. As Fravor further descended. he reported that the object began ascending
along a curved path. maintaining some distance from the F-18. mirroring its trajectory in
opposite circles. Fravor then made a more aggressive maneuver. plunging his fighter
to aim below the object. but at this point the UFO accelerated. and went out of sight
in less than two seconds. leaving the pilots “pretty weirded out”. Subsequently. the two
fighter jets began a new course to the combat air patrol rendezvous point. “Within seconds”.
Princeton radioed the jets that. the radar target had reappeared 60 miles (97 km) away.
at this predetermined rendezvous point. According to Popular Mechanics. a physical object. would
have had to move greater than 2,400 miles per hour. (3,900 km/h) to cover the distance
in the reported time. Two other jets went to investigate the new radar location. but
“By the time the Super Hornets arrived. the object had already disappeared. Both F-18s
then returned to Nimitz. Commander Fravor reflected on his sighting. “I have no idea
what I saw. It had no plumes. wings or rotors and outran our F-18s. But I want to fly one”.
After the return of the first team to Nimitz. a second team took off at approximately 12:00
PST. this time equipped with an advanced infrared camera. This camera recorded an evasive unidentified
aerial system on video. publicly released by the Pentagon on 16 December 2017 alongside
the revelation of. the funding of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program. This
footage is known as the 2004 USS Nimitz FLIR1 video. It officially shed some light on a
decade-old story. that was largely unknown. except for a 2015 second-hand story that.
in spite of providing many details. remained unconfirmed at that time. A second infrared
footage, known as the GIMBAL video. has been released by the Pentagon alongside the 2004
FLIR1 footage. Although the media often present the two videos together. to illustrate the
2004 USS Nimitz UFO incident. the GIMBAL video is unrelated. filmed at the East Coast of
the United States at an unknown date. Defense and security writer Kyle Mizokami
suggested three possibilities that could explain the sightings. The first is equipment malfunction
or misinterpretation; USS Princeton’s radars and the Super Hornets’ electro-optical sensors
and radars could have all malfunctioned, or the crew could have misinterpreted a number
of natural phenomena. The second is classified government technology: If the objects were
aircraft operated by the United States government, it would make sense that they were kept secret,
as the object easily outmaneuvered multiple Super Hornets, a jet that was considered state-of-the-art
in 2004. The third possibility is that the sightings were caused by objects of extraterrestrials.
The New York Times included a disclaimer in its reporting of the incident: Experts caution
that earthly explanations often exist for such incidents, and that not knowing the explanation
does not mean that the event has interstellar origins”. Physicist Don Lincoln suggested
that it was very unlikely that what these pilots are reporting turns out to be an unfriendly
superweapon or an alien craft, however he would like to see the reports investigated
” under the premise that the best science is done when as many opinions are considered
as possible, preferably in the open and subject to peer review.” According to Lincoln, unidentified
doesn’t mean flying saucer. or a Russian superweapon. It merely means unidentified. Science journalist
Dennis Overbye argued. a “stubborn residue” of unexplained aerial phenomenon remain after
review. Overbye highlighted that some of these accounts. are obtained from respected observers
such as military pilots. However, he cautioned. as modern psychology and neuroscience have
established. the senses are an unreliable portal to reality, whatever that is. According
to Steve Cummings of Raytheon Space and Airborne Systems. the video images captured by. a Raytheon-made
Advanced Targeting Forward Look Infrared sensor. are not definitive proof that. the jet pilots
were chasing an actual UFO. Cummings noted, “To really be sure, we would need the raw
data. Visual displays alone are not the best evidence.
According to Joe Nickell writing for the Skeptical Inquirer. there are differing versions of
Fravor’s account. including a “truly curious document. that tells Fravor’s story in the
form of a military-style briefing. designed to create a “pseudo top-secret appearance.
Nickell identifies the document as. a third-person account of an interview with Fravor. produced
by a fringe-ideas group called To the Stars Academy of Arts and Science”. Regarding the
visual sightings reported by Fravor. Nickell questioned how he could see. what a forty-foot
object was doing from forty miles away”. and characterized the “confusion. and incompleteness
in the reports. of the training mission as a “comedy of errors. Nickell and astronomer
and former Air Force pilot James E. McGaha. speculated that. reports of churning water
could have been caused by a submerging submarine. sightings could have been of a reconnaissance
drone. and that “one video image showing an object. suddenly zooming off screen was likely
caused by the plane’s banking. while the camera was stopped at the end of its sweep”.
Joe Nickell further argues. this was Fravor’s first military assignment with the U.S. Navy’s
F-18 Super Hornet. and as a result, the experience “obviously rattled him. The Washington Post
identified David Fravor as. the commanding officer of the VFA-41 Black Aces. at the time
of the 2004 incident. The Toledo Blade stated Fravor retired from military service in 2006.
after a 24 year career. including 18 years as a Navy pilot and deployments in Iraq. that
began during Desert Storm. Fravor stated the identities of other Naval officers. aboard
the two fighter jets during his mission. on November 14, 2004 had not been released publicly.
as they were still active in the military. at the time of the Blade publication in 2018.
Stephen Pope. editor of Flying magazine criticized the stories of the incident. in The New York
Times as “borderline-sensationalist”. and says they provoked. a flurry of breathless
reporting by media outlets around the world. most of which seem to have failed to notice
that. the Times’ original reporting has some major problems with it. Pope noted that.
the purported UFO videos were not released by the Pentagon. but by a former official
who is now connected to. “To the Stars Academy of the Arts and Sciences. a Las Vegas company
that is seeking funding for UFO research.