Pearland voters to decide whether to build new animal shelter


OR OR APP OR APP TO OR APP TO GET OR APP TO GET A OR APP TO GET A CLOSER OR APP TO GET A CLOSER LOOK OR APP TO GET A CLOSER LOOK AT OR APP TO GET A CLOSER LOOK AT
THE OR APP TO GET A CLOSER LOOK AT
THE FINDINGS.>>>>>>PEARLAND>>>PEARLAND VOTERS>>>PEARLAND VOTERS WILL>>>PEARLAND VOTERS WILL SOON>>>PEARLAND VOTERS WILL SOON
GET>>>PEARLAND VOTERS WILL SOON
GET THEIR>>>PEARLAND VOTERS WILL SOON
GET THEIR SAY>>>PEARLAND VOTERS WILL SOON
GET THEIR SAY ON>>>PEARLAND VOTERS WILL SOON
GET THEIR SAY ON THE>>>PEARLAND VOTERS WILL SOON
GET THEIR SAY ON THE PROPOSAL GET THEIR SAY ON THE PROPOSAL GET THEIR SAY ON THE PROPOSAL
TO GET THEIR SAY ON THE PROPOSAL
TO BUILD GET THEIR SAY ON THE PROPOSAL
TO BUILD A GET THEIR SAY ON THE PROPOSAL
TO BUILD A NEW GET THEIR SAY ON THE PROPOSAL
TO BUILD A NEW ANIMAL GET THEIR SAY ON THE PROPOSAL
TO BUILD A NEW ANIMAL SHELTER. TO BUILD A NEW ANIMAL SHELTER. TO BUILD A NEW ANIMAL SHELTER.
SUPPORTERS TO BUILD A NEW ANIMAL SHELTER.
SUPPORTERS SAY TO BUILD A NEW ANIMAL SHELTER.
SUPPORTERS SAY PEARLAND TO BUILD A NEW ANIMAL SHELTER.
SUPPORTERS SAY PEARLAND NEEDS TO BUILD A NEW ANIMAL SHELTER.
SUPPORTERS SAY PEARLAND NEEDS A SUPPORTERS SAY PEARLAND NEEDS A SUPPORTERS SAY PEARLAND NEEDS A
NEW SUPPORTERS SAY PEARLAND NEEDS A
NEW ANIMAL SUPPORTERS SAY PEARLAND NEEDS A
NEW ANIMAL SERVICE SUPPORTERS SAY PEARLAND NEEDS A
NEW ANIMAL SERVICE ADOPTION NEW ANIMAL SERVICE ADOPTION NEW ANIMAL SERVICE ADOPTION
CENTER NEW ANIMAL SERVICE ADOPTION
CENTER BIG NEW ANIMAL SERVICE ADOPTION
CENTER BIG ENOUGH NEW ANIMAL SERVICE ADOPTION
CENTER BIG ENOUGH TO NEW ANIMAL SERVICE ADOPTION
CENTER BIG ENOUGH TO GIVE NEW ANIMAL SERVICE ADOPTION
CENTER BIG ENOUGH TO GIVE THE CENTER BIG ENOUGH TO GIVE THE CENTER BIG ENOUGH TO GIVE THE
FACILITY CENTER BIG ENOUGH TO GIVE THE
FACILITY A CENTER BIG ENOUGH TO GIVE THE
FACILITY A NO CENTER BIG ENOUGH TO GIVE THE
FACILITY A NO KILL CENTER BIG ENOUGH TO GIVE THE
FACILITY A NO KILL STATUS. FACILITY A NO KILL STATUS. FACILITY A NO KILL STATUS.
WE FACILITY A NO KILL STATUS.
WE ARE FACILITY A NO KILL STATUS.
WE ARE LIVE FACILITY A NO KILL STATUS.
WE ARE LIVE AT FACILITY A NO KILL STATUS.
WE ARE LIVE AT THE FACILITY A NO KILL STATUS.
WE ARE LIVE AT THE SHELTER WE ARE LIVE AT THE SHELTER WE ARE LIVE AT THE SHELTER
GETTING WE ARE LIVE AT THE SHELTER
GETTING A WE ARE LIVE AT THE SHELTER
GETTING A CLOSER WE ARE LIVE AT THE SHELTER
GETTING A CLOSER LOOK WE ARE LIVE AT THE SHELTER
GETTING A CLOSER LOOK AT WE ARE LIVE AT THE SHELTER
GETTING A CLOSER LOOK AT WHAT GETTING A CLOSER LOOK AT WHAT GETTING A CLOSER LOOK AT WHAT
IS GETTING A CLOSER LOOK AT WHAT
IS AT GETTING A CLOSER LOOK AT WHAT
IS AT STAKE GETTING A CLOSER LOOK AT WHAT
IS AT STAKE HERE. IS AT STAKE HERE. IS AT STAKE HERE.
HI IS AT STAKE HERE.
HI JOSH. HI JOSH. HI JOSH.
>>HI JOSH.
>>Reporter: HI JOSH.
>>Reporter: HI HI JOSH.
>>Reporter: HI SHERN-MIN, HI JOSH.
>>Reporter: HI SHERN-MIN, BACK>>Reporter: HI SHERN-MIN, BACK>>Reporter: HI SHERN-MIN, BACK
IN>>Reporter: HI SHERN-MIN, BACK
IN 1997>>Reporter: HI SHERN-MIN, BACK
IN 1997 IS>>Reporter: HI SHERN-MIN, BACK
IN 1997 IS WHEN>>Reporter: HI SHERN-MIN, BACK
IN 1997 IS WHEN THE>>Reporter: HI SHERN-MIN, BACK
IN 1997 IS WHEN THE CITY>>Reporter: HI SHERN-MIN, BACK
IN 1997 IS WHEN THE CITY BUILT IN 1997 IS WHEN THE CITY BUILT IN 1997 IS WHEN THE CITY BUILT
THEIR IN 1997 IS WHEN THE CITY BUILT
THEIR CURRENT IN 1997 IS WHEN THE CITY BUILT
THEIR CURRENT SHELTER, IN 1997 IS WHEN THE CITY BUILT
THEIR CURRENT SHELTER, IT THEIR CURRENT SHELTER, IT THEIR CURRENT SHELTER, IT
SERVED THEIR CURRENT SHELTER, IT
SERVED THE THEIR CURRENT SHELTER, IT
SERVED THE COMMUNITY THEIR CURRENT SHELTER, IT
SERVED THE COMMUNITY WELL. SERVED THE COMMUNITY WELL. SERVED THE COMMUNITY WELL.
BUT SERVED THE COMMUNITY WELL.
BUT THERE SERVED THE COMMUNITY WELL.
BUT THERE WERE SERVED THE COMMUNITY WELL.
BUT THERE WERE ONLY SERVED THE COMMUNITY WELL.
BUT THERE WERE ONLY 30,000 BUT THERE WERE ONLY 30,000 BUT THERE WERE ONLY 30,000
PEOPLE BUT THERE WERE ONLY 30,000
PEOPLE HERE BUT THERE WERE ONLY 30,000
PEOPLE HERE THE BUT THERE WERE ONLY 30,000
PEOPLE HERE THE TIME, BUT THERE WERE ONLY 30,000
PEOPLE HERE THE TIME, AND BUT THERE WERE ONLY 30,000
PEOPLE HERE THE TIME, AND NOW PEOPLE HERE THE TIME, AND NOW PEOPLE HERE THE TIME, AND NOW
THERE PEOPLE HERE THE TIME, AND NOW
THERE ARE PEOPLE HERE THE TIME, AND NOW
THERE ARE 130,000 PEOPLE HERE THE TIME, AND NOW
THERE ARE 130,000 PEOPLE. THERE ARE 130,000 PEOPLE. THERE ARE 130,000 PEOPLE.
WITH THERE ARE 130,000 PEOPLE.
WITH ALL THERE ARE 130,000 PEOPLE.
WITH ALL THOSE THERE ARE 130,000 PEOPLE.
WITH ALL THOSE PEOPLE THERE ARE 130,000 PEOPLE.
WITH ALL THOSE PEOPLE CAME THERE ARE 130,000 PEOPLE.
WITH ALL THOSE PEOPLE CAME MORE WITH ALL THOSE PEOPLE CAME MORE WITH ALL THOSE PEOPLE CAME MORE
PETS. PETS. PETS.
>>PETS.
>>IT PETS.
>>IT JUST PETS.
>>IT JUST DOESN’T PETS.
>>IT JUST DOESN’T WORK, PETS.
>>IT JUST DOESN’T WORK, IT’S>>IT JUST DOESN’T WORK, IT’S>>IT JUST DOESN’T WORK, IT’S
JUST>>IT JUST DOESN’T WORK, IT’S
JUST NOT>>IT JUST DOESN’T WORK, IT’S
JUST NOT BIG>>IT JUST DOESN’T WORK, IT’S
JUST NOT BIG ENOUGH. JUST NOT BIG ENOUGH. JUST NOT BIG ENOUGH.
>>JUST NOT BIG ENOUGH.
>>TOUGH JUST NOT BIG ENOUGH.
>>TOUGH DECISIONS JUST NOT BIG ENOUGH.
>>TOUGH DECISIONS ARE JUST NOT BIG ENOUGH.
>>TOUGH DECISIONS ARE MADE.>>TOUGH DECISIONS ARE MADE.>>TOUGH DECISIONS ARE MADE.
>>>>TOUGH DECISIONS ARE MADE.
>>COUNCILMAN>>TOUGH DECISIONS ARE MADE.
>>COUNCILMAN TRENT>>TOUGH DECISIONS ARE MADE.
>>COUNCILMAN TRENT PEREZ>>TOUGH DECISIONS ARE MADE.
>>COUNCILMAN TRENT PEREZ IS>>COUNCILMAN TRENT PEREZ IS>>COUNCILMAN TRENT PEREZ IS
PUSHING>>COUNCILMAN TRENT PEREZ IS
PUSHING FOR>>COUNCILMAN TRENT PEREZ IS
PUSHING FOR A>>COUNCILMAN TRENT PEREZ IS
PUSHING FOR A NEW>>COUNCILMAN TRENT PEREZ IS
PUSHING FOR A NEW NEAR>>COUNCILMAN TRENT PEREZ IS
PUSHING FOR A NEW NEAR $13 PUSHING FOR A NEW NEAR $13 PUSHING FOR A NEW NEAR $13
MILLION PUSHING FOR A NEW NEAR $13
MILLION PROPOSITION, PUSHING FOR A NEW NEAR $13
MILLION PROPOSITION, APPROVING MILLION PROPOSITION, APPROVING MILLION PROPOSITION, APPROVING
A MILLION PROPOSITION, APPROVING
A SHELTER MILLION PROPOSITION, APPROVING
A SHELTER THAT MILLION PROPOSITION, APPROVING
A SHELTER THAT NEARLY MILLION PROPOSITION, APPROVING
A SHELTER THAT NEARLY DOUBLES A SHELTER THAT NEARLY DOUBLES A SHELTER THAT NEARLY DOUBLES
THE A SHELTER THAT NEARLY DOUBLES
THE AMOUNT A SHELTER THAT NEARLY DOUBLES
THE AMOUNT OF A SHELTER THAT NEARLY DOUBLES
THE AMOUNT OF DOG A SHELTER THAT NEARLY DOUBLES
THE AMOUNT OF DOG AND A SHELTER THAT NEARLY DOUBLES
THE AMOUNT OF DOG AND CAT THE AMOUNT OF DOG AND CAT THE AMOUNT OF DOG AND CAT
KENNELS THE AMOUNT OF DOG AND CAT
KENNELS THIS THE AMOUNT OF DOG AND CAT
KENNELS THIS FACILITY THE AMOUNT OF DOG AND CAT
KENNELS THIS FACILITY CAN THE AMOUNT OF DOG AND CAT
KENNELS THIS FACILITY CAN HOLD. KENNELS THIS FACILITY CAN HOLD. KENNELS THIS FACILITY CAN HOLD.
>>KENNELS THIS FACILITY CAN HOLD.
>>THE KENNELS THIS FACILITY CAN HOLD.
>>THE VALUE KENNELS THIS FACILITY CAN HOLD.
>>THE VALUE OF KENNELS THIS FACILITY CAN HOLD.
>>THE VALUE OF 13 KENNELS THIS FACILITY CAN HOLD.
>>THE VALUE OF 13 1/2 KENNELS THIS FACILITY CAN HOLD.
>>THE VALUE OF 13 1/2 MILLION>>THE VALUE OF 13 1/2 MILLION>>THE VALUE OF 13 1/2 MILLION
DOLLARS>>THE VALUE OF 13 1/2 MILLION
DOLLARS IS>>THE VALUE OF 13 1/2 MILLION
DOLLARS IS FOR>>THE VALUE OF 13 1/2 MILLION
DOLLARS IS FOR THE>>THE VALUE OF 13 1/2 MILLION
DOLLARS IS FOR THE ENTIRETY>>THE VALUE OF 13 1/2 MILLION
DOLLARS IS FOR THE ENTIRETY OF DOLLARS IS FOR THE ENTIRETY OF DOLLARS IS FOR THE ENTIRETY OF
THE DOLLARS IS FOR THE ENTIRETY OF
THE PROJECT. THE PROJECT. THE PROJECT.
IT THE PROJECT.
IT IS THE PROJECT.
IT IS ALSO THE PROJECT.
IT IS ALSO FOR THE PROJECT.
IT IS ALSO FOR THE THE PROJECT.
IT IS ALSO FOR THE DESIGN, IT IS ALSO FOR THE DESIGN, IT IS ALSO FOR THE DESIGN,
WHICH IT IS ALSO FOR THE DESIGN,
WHICH IS IT IS ALSO FOR THE DESIGN,
WHICH IS BASICALLY IT IS ALSO FOR THE DESIGN,
WHICH IS BASICALLY THE WHICH IS BASICALLY THE WHICH IS BASICALLY THE
FURNITURE WHICH IS BASICALLY THE
FURNITURE AND WHICH IS BASICALLY THE
FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT WHICH IS BASICALLY THE
FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT WE WHICH IS BASICALLY THE
FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT WE NEED FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT WE NEED FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT WE NEED
TO FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT WE NEED
TO PUT FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT WE NEED
TO PUT IN. TO PUT IN. TO PUT IN.
>>TO PUT IN.
>>Reporter: TO PUT IN.
>>Reporter: AND, TO PUT IN.
>>Reporter: AND, THERE TO PUT IN.
>>Reporter: AND, THERE IS TO PUT IN.
>>Reporter: AND, THERE IS ROOM>>Reporter: AND, THERE IS ROOM>>Reporter: AND, THERE IS ROOM
FOR>>Reporter: AND, THERE IS ROOM
FOR THE>>Reporter: AND, THERE IS ROOM
FOR THE POSSIBILITY>>Reporter: AND, THERE IS ROOM
FOR THE POSSIBILITY OF>>Reporter: AND, THERE IS ROOM
FOR THE POSSIBILITY OF BRUNT FOR THE POSSIBILITY OF BRUNT FOR THE POSSIBILITY OF BRUNT
BUYING FOR THE POSSIBILITY OF BRUNT
BUYING PROPERTY FOR THE POSSIBILITY OF BRUNT
BUYING PROPERTY FOR FOR THE POSSIBILITY OF BRUNT
BUYING PROPERTY FOR THE BUYING PROPERTY FOR THE BUYING PROPERTY FOR THE
BUILDING. BUILDING. BUILDING.
THE BUILDING.
THE CITY BUILDING.
THE CITY SAYS BUILDING.
THE CITY SAYS IT BUILDING.
THE CITY SAYS IT IS BUILDING.
THE CITY SAYS IT IS DESIGNED THE CITY SAYS IT IS DESIGNED THE CITY SAYS IT IS DESIGNED
FOR THE CITY SAYS IT IS DESIGNED
FOR ANTICIPATED THE CITY SAYS IT IS DESIGNED
FOR ANTICIPATED GROWTH. FOR ANTICIPATED GROWTH. FOR ANTICIPATED GROWTH.
THIS FOR ANTICIPATED GROWTH.
THIS BUDGET FOR ANTICIPATED GROWTH.
THIS BUDGET IS FOR ANTICIPATED GROWTH.
THIS BUDGET IS ESTIMATED FOR ANTICIPATED GROWTH.
THIS BUDGET IS ESTIMATED THAT THIS BUDGET IS ESTIMATED THAT THIS BUDGET IS ESTIMATED THAT
THAT THIS BUDGET IS ESTIMATED THAT
THAT NEW THIS BUDGET IS ESTIMATED THAT
THAT NEW FACILITY THIS BUDGET IS ESTIMATED THAT
THAT NEW FACILITY WHAT THIS BUDGET IS ESTIMATED THAT
THAT NEW FACILITY WHAT KERRY THAT NEW FACILITY WHAT KERRY THAT NEW FACILITY WHAT KERRY
GROWS THAT NEW FACILITY WHAT KERRY
GROWS INTO THAT NEW FACILITY WHAT KERRY
GROWS INTO THE THAT NEW FACILITY WHAT KERRY
GROWS INTO THE COMMUNIQUCAND GROWS INTO THE COMMUNIQUCAND GROWS INTO THE COMMUNIQUCAND
POPULATION. POPULATION. POPULATION.
>>POPULATION.
>>Reporter: POPULATION.
>>Reporter: IF POPULATION.
>>Reporter: IF APPROVED, POPULATION.
>>Reporter: IF APPROVED, THE>>Reporter: IF APPROVED, THE>>Reporter: IF APPROVED, THE
SHELTER>>Reporter: IF APPROVED, THE
SHELTER WOULDN’T>>Reporter: IF APPROVED, THE
SHELTER WOULDN’T BE>>Reporter: IF APPROVED, THE
SHELTER WOULDN’T BE LABELED>>Reporter: IF APPROVED, THE
SHELTER WOULDN’T BE LABELED A SHELTER WOULDN’T BE LABELED A SHELTER WOULDN’T BE LABELED A
NO SHELTER WOULDN’T BE LABELED A
NO KILL SHELTER WOULDN’T BE LABELED A
NO KILL FACILITY. NO KILL FACILITY. NO KILL FACILITY.
HOWEVER, NO KILL FACILITY.
HOWEVER, IF NO KILL FACILITY.
HOWEVER, IF THE NO KILL FACILITY.
HOWEVER, IF THE CITY NO KILL FACILITY.
HOWEVER, IF THE CITY HAD NO KILL FACILITY.
HOWEVER, IF THE CITY HAD THE HOWEVER, IF THE CITY HAD THE HOWEVER, IF THE CITY HAD THE
SHELTER HOWEVER, IF THE CITY HAD THE
SHELTER LAST HOWEVER, IF THE CITY HAD THE
SHELTER LAST YEAR, HOWEVER, IF THE CITY HAD THE
SHELTER LAST YEAR, THEY HOWEVER, IF THE CITY HAD THE
SHELTER LAST YEAR, THEY WOULD SHELTER LAST YEAR, THEY WOULD SHELTER LAST YEAR, THEY WOULD
HAVE SHELTER LAST YEAR, THEY WOULD
HAVE RELEASED SHELTER LAST YEAR, THEY WOULD
HAVE RELEASED 90% SHELTER LAST YEAR, THEY WOULD
HAVE RELEASED 90% OF SHELTER LAST YEAR, THEY WOULD
HAVE RELEASED 90% OF ALL HAVE RELEASED 90% OF ALL HAVE RELEASED 90% OF ALL
ADOPTABLE HAVE RELEASED 90% OF ALL
ADOPTABLE PETS HAVE RELEASED 90% OF ALL
ADOPTABLE PETS ALIVE, HAVE RELEASED 90% OF ALL
ADOPTABLE PETS ALIVE, WHICH HAVE RELEASED 90% OF ALL
ADOPTABLE PETS ALIVE, WHICH BY ADOPTABLE PETS ALIVE, WHICH BY ADOPTABLE PETS ALIVE, WHICH BY
CITY ADOPTABLE PETS ALIVE, WHICH BY
CITY DEFINITION, ADOPTABLE PETS ALIVE, WHICH BY
CITY DEFINITION, WOULD ADOPTABLE PETS ALIVE, WHICH BY
CITY DEFINITION, WOULD HAVE CITY DEFINITION, WOULD HAVE CITY DEFINITION, WOULD HAVE
MADE CITY DEFINITION, WOULD HAVE
MADE IT CITY DEFINITION, WOULD HAVE
MADE IT A CITY DEFINITION, WOULD HAVE
MADE IT A NO CITY DEFINITION, WOULD HAVE
MADE IT A NO KILL CITY DEFINITION, WOULD HAVE
MADE IT A NO KILL STATUS MADE IT A NO KILL STATUS MADE IT A NO KILL STATUS
SHELTER. SHELTER. SHELTER.
>>SHELTER.
>>WE SHELTER.
>>WE CAN SHELTER.
>>WE CAN DRASTICALLY SHELTER.
>>WE CAN DRASTICALLY REDUCE>>WE CAN DRASTICALLY REDUCE>>WE CAN DRASTICALLY REDUCE
THE>>WE CAN DRASTICALLY REDUCE
THE AMOUNT>>WE CAN DRASTICALLY REDUCE
THE AMOUNT OF>>WE CAN DRASTICALLY REDUCE
THE AMOUNT OF UTILIZATIONS>>WE CAN DRASTICALLY REDUCE
THE AMOUNT OF UTILIZATIONS OF THE AMOUNT OF UTILIZATIONS OF THE AMOUNT OF UTILIZATIONS OF
THE THE AMOUNT OF UTILIZATIONS OF
THE ANIMALS THE AMOUNT OF UTILIZATIONS OF
THE ANIMALS THAT THE AMOUNT OF UTILIZATIONS OF
THE ANIMALS THAT WE THE AMOUNT OF UTILIZATIONS OF
THE ANIMALS THAT WE HAVE THE AMOUNT OF UTILIZATIONS OF
THE ANIMALS THAT WE HAVE TO THE AMOUNT OF UTILIZATIONS OF
THE ANIMALS THAT WE HAVE TO DO THE ANIMALS THAT WE HAVE TO DO THE ANIMALS THAT WE HAVE TO DO
NOW. NOW. NOW.
>>NOW.
>>Reporter: NOW.
>>Reporter: BUILDING NOW.
>>Reporter: BUILDING A NOW.
>>Reporter: BUILDING A NEW>>Reporter: BUILDING A NEW>>Reporter: BUILDING A NEW
SHELTER>>Reporter: BUILDING A NEW
SHELTER IS>>Reporter: BUILDING A NEW
SHELTER IS ONE>>Reporter: BUILDING A NEW
SHELTER IS ONE OF>>Reporter: BUILDING A NEW
SHELTER IS ONE OF FIVE SHELTER IS ONE OF FIVE SHELTER IS ONE OF FIVE
PROPOSITIONS SHELTER IS ONE OF FIVE
PROPOSITIONS THAT SHELTER IS ONE OF FIVE
PROPOSITIONS THAT ARE SHELTER IS ONE OF FIVE
PROPOSITIONS THAT ARE ON SHELTER IS ONE OF FIVE
PROPOSITIONS THAT ARE ON THE PROPOSITIONS THAT ARE ON THE PROPOSITIONS THAT ARE ON THE
BALLOT PROPOSITIONS THAT ARE ON THE
BALLOT FOR PROPOSITIONS THAT ARE ON THE
BALLOT FOR MAY

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *