Open Society, 25 Years after the Fall of the Berlin Wall


The fact of the matter is that up until 1989,
the peoples of Eastern Europe were denied their fundamental democratic rights. During Soviet system, there was one opinion,
there was one right answer. In Eastern Europe, before the Berlin Wall
came down, there was a very, very explicit aspiration towards what you might call civil
society or the open society. There was a powerful students’ movement
and of young intellectuals in defense of human rights, of constitution provisions. A lot of people began to search for ways how
they could introduce more freedoms. This was a very good point for Soros to intervene,
to step into the picture. I set up a foundation. I reflected what it is that I really care
about, and it turned out to be a rather abstract concept of an open society. The freedom of thought. Democracy, transparency, and accountability. These purposes did have a common denominator,
which was opening up the country. The open society, which is part of a big tradition
of political reformism, is based on two very simple assumptions: that capitalism is a system
that have a capacity for self correction, and, secondly, that democracy is a system
that have a capacity for self correction. Anything that was an alternative, an expression
of civil society, we were ready to support. He helped, of course, first of all financially. But it wasn’t just about money. It was about ideas, about the theory of open
society. The Central European University was also—I
think—incredibly important in order to exchange ideas, in order to exchange experiences. The foundation also financed the travels of researchers,
scientists, grants. In those days, it was simply helping individual
actors, to give them space, to give them opportunities. Bringing a book to someone was a real success. We justified our claims for better life in
terms of the justice, and the entire struggle that followed—and that eventually brought
down communism—was based on human rights. It’s relatively easy to rewrite the constitution,
but it’s more difficult to change people’s attitudes towards power. People started to think that if communism
was bad, then we should have absolutely free markets. There’s no time for discussion. We will introduce—implement—these ideas, not searching for—not looking for—democratic legitimization for it. With hindsight, I think that the problem was
that all those little things we had been given by the regime, the strength and our attitude
of dependence from this power. In Russia, they reconstructed something that’s
not all that different from communist systems that collapsed—it’s also an authoritarian
system. Societies don’t just close back up. They’ve changed by the experience of being
open, even for a short time, and that change is there and can be the foundation for another
period of openness. You have to fight when you feel that your
autonomy, your humanity, has been taken away or you are not able to live it out. Before, people when they realized that something is wrong, you know, with this world, they tried to organize. Now, when they realize that something is wrong,
they try and individually to adapt to this imperfect situation. To revive it, we need ourselves, we have to
be closer to each other. But, also, what is needed, I think, is imagination. Imagination is creativity, and without that
nothing moves. And since open society is an ongoing struggle,
you can’t do anything without imagination. When you are engaged in trying to improve
the world, you have to keep on changing what you do.

15 thoughts on “Open Society, 25 Years after the Fall of the Berlin Wall

  1. George Soros is piggybacking transnational corporate globalisation and neoliberal free trade ideology on the back of human rights and democracy. It is a clever and persuasive combination when fused with lots of money.

  2. I am from eastern europe…ex-Yugoslavia exactly. 
    This is just another way of making westerners into complete and utter idiots and just shells to implant them with information they will one day call truth. Easy to control and sway by elites. 
    For every statement in this video I can provide you what that gave us eastern europeans in return. Talking about powerful student movements and shit which were payed, which prostituted to the west to destroy what we once had. People here didn't have much, but we all had equally and people were happy since no one could look them from above like rich people do to regular/poor people. Now in democracy, here in ex-Yugslavian nations, we all have 1% that own everything and 99% that fight for scraps. That is democracy for you. I remember, here in communism/socialism, people were always there for one another, never jealous on someone else, because we were all in the same situation. Never selfish, and the greed of today that results in in state owned valuable real estate to be dissolved and sold off to the western corporations. We didn't have much, we however did have enough, unemployment was practically 0%, but we had the most valuable thing in the world…we had each other to rely on. Neighbors were always there for one another and now…in western capitalist "democracy", you cannot put trust even in your own family members. We didn't have much, but we had it all.

  3. The worst thing about the socialism/communism was that the western capitalistic world didn't accept it, and didn't want to allow its growth. The reason – the Cold War. The fight for power. The thing that helped capitalism to take over was the closed market society in the soviet countries. Every nation wants peace, no borders, and no harsh restrictions. That's why the capitalistic politics try to divide all the nations, because they know that if there's no borders and all people are peaceful then socialism is the better option, and sooner or later all the people would have come to that conclusion. The truth is that it doesn't matter if it's communism or capitalism, it's all about who is creating and applying the rules. The rules (laws) are made by the rich and greedy people. If you had to make rules, would you make them for your loss? If the laws are in favor of the poor people in one point they'll become rich, powerful and greedy enough to want their own rules. Equality is the best option, but it has to be a worldwide peaceful society of no major restrictions among the people and no discrimination in any form. It's a long way till we manage to create such a society. The main reason is that we're still dividing and yet so happy about that fact. 🙂 It's stupid. We're stupid.

  4. I don't agree with the statements in this video. Socrates showed us democracy can be bad. Marks showed us how free capitalism is bad. History showed us that total socialism simply doesn't work in the long run. What we should be doing, is finding the sweet spot in the middle.

  5. hbhvghkkkkgewwrjnhyhhhvFcu _/ ;9:(8&-&76))))0995433212%456778889ghgfheeicrhvdmsugujfjfjfjhfkhjgfkf mhcfghh909115224344uuf5456556989878%8899)0ⁿ122334660¹²³⁴⅝68890012577577890

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *