NYC Human Rights Commission says terms “Illegals” and “Illegal Alien” are discriminatory


COURTROOMS. COURTROOMS.
>>COURTROOMS.
>>RIGHT.>>RIGHT.>>RIGHT.
>>>>RIGHT.
>>THANK>>RIGHT.
>>THANK YOU>>RIGHT.
>>THANK YOU SO>>RIGHT.
>>THANK YOU SO MUCH,>>RIGHT.
>>THANK YOU SO MUCH, I>>THANK YOU SO MUCH, I>>THANK YOU SO MUCH, I
APPRECIATE>>THANK YOU SO MUCH, I
APPRECIATE THAT. APPRECIATE THAT. APPRECIATE THAT.
>>>APPRECIATE THAT.
>>>WELL, APPRECIATE THAT.
>>>WELL, IN APPRECIATE THAT.
>>>WELL, IN A APPRECIATE THAT.
>>>WELL, IN A NEW APPRECIATE THAT.
>>>WELL, IN A NEW GUIDANCE>>>WELL, IN A NEW GUIDANCE>>>WELL, IN A NEW GUIDANCE
FROM>>>WELL, IN A NEW GUIDANCE
FROM THE>>>WELL, IN A NEW GUIDANCE
FROM THE NEW>>>WELL, IN A NEW GUIDANCE
FROM THE NEW YORK>>>WELL, IN A NEW GUIDANCE
FROM THE NEW YORK CITY FROM THE NEW YORK CITY FROM THE NEW YORK CITY
COMMISSION FROM THE NEW YORK CITY
COMMISSION ON FROM THE NEW YORK CITY
COMMISSION ON HUMAN FROM THE NEW YORK CITY
COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, FROM THE NEW YORK CITY
COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, IT COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, IT COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, IT
IS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, IT
IS NOW COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, IT
IS NOW A COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, IT
IS NOW A PUNISHABLE COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, IT
IS NOW A PUNISHABLE OFFENSE COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, IT
IS NOW A PUNISHABLE OFFENSE TO IS NOW A PUNISHABLE OFFENSE TO IS NOW A PUNISHABLE OFFENSE TO
USE IS NOW A PUNISHABLE OFFENSE TO
USE THE IS NOW A PUNISHABLE OFFENSE TO
USE THE TERMS IS NOW A PUNISHABLE OFFENSE TO
USE THE TERMS ILLEGAL IS NOW A PUNISHABLE OFFENSE TO
USE THE TERMS ILLEGAL ALIEN IS NOW A PUNISHABLE OFFENSE TO
USE THE TERMS ILLEGAL ALIEN OR USE THE TERMS ILLEGAL ALIEN OR USE THE TERMS ILLEGAL ALIEN OR
ILLEGALS USE THE TERMS ILLEGAL ALIEN OR
ILLEGALS WITH USE THE TERMS ILLEGAL ALIEN OR
ILLEGALS WITH THE USE THE TERMS ILLEGAL ALIEN OR
ILLEGALS WITH THE INTENT USE THE TERMS ILLEGAL ALIEN OR
ILLEGALS WITH THE INTENT TO ILLEGALS WITH THE INTENT TO ILLEGALS WITH THE INTENT TO
DEMEAN ILLEGALS WITH THE INTENT TO
DEMEAN SOMEONE, ILLEGALS WITH THE INTENT TO
DEMEAN SOMEONE, HUMILIATE ILLEGALS WITH THE INTENT TO
DEMEAN SOMEONE, HUMILIATE THEM DEMEAN SOMEONE, HUMILIATE THEM DEMEAN SOMEONE, HUMILIATE THEM
OR DEMEAN SOMEONE, HUMILIATE THEM
OR HARASS DEMEAN SOMEONE, HUMILIATE THEM
OR HARASS A DEMEAN SOMEONE, HUMILIATE THEM
OR HARASS A PERSON. OR HARASS A PERSON. OR HARASS A PERSON.
NOW OR HARASS A PERSON.
NOW READING OR HARASS A PERSON.
NOW READING THAT, OR HARASS A PERSON.
NOW READING THAT, WE OR HARASS A PERSON.
NOW READING THAT, WE WONDER OR HARASS A PERSON.
NOW READING THAT, WE WONDER HOW NOW READING THAT, WE WONDER HOW NOW READING THAT, WE WONDER HOW
THEY NOW READING THAT, WE WONDER HOW
THEY COULD NOW READING THAT, WE WONDER HOW
THEY COULD POLICE NOW READING THAT, WE WONDER HOW
THEY COULD POLICE THE NOW READING THAT, WE WONDER HOW
THEY COULD POLICE THE WORDS THEY COULD POLICE THE WORDS THEY COULD POLICE THE WORDS
THAT THEY COULD POLICE THE WORDS
THAT YOU THEY COULD POLICE THE WORDS
THAT YOU SAY THEY COULD POLICE THE WORDS
THAT YOU SAY IN THEY COULD POLICE THE WORDS
THAT YOU SAY IN THAT THEY COULD POLICE THE WORDS
THAT YOU SAY IN THAT CITY THEY COULD POLICE THE WORDS
THAT YOU SAY IN THAT CITY AND THAT YOU SAY IN THAT CITY AND THAT YOU SAY IN THAT CITY AND
EVEN THAT YOU SAY IN THAT CITY AND
EVEN IF THAT YOU SAY IN THAT CITY AND
EVEN IF THEY THAT YOU SAY IN THAT CITY AND
EVEN IF THEY ARE THAT YOU SAY IN THAT CITY AND
EVEN IF THEY ARE HATEFUL, THAT YOU SAY IN THAT CITY AND
EVEN IF THEY ARE HATEFUL, THE EVEN IF THEY ARE HATEFUL, THE EVEN IF THEY ARE HATEFUL, THE
VERY EVEN IF THEY ARE HATEFUL, THE
VERY FIRST EVEN IF THEY ARE HATEFUL, THE
VERY FIRST AMENDMENT EVEN IF THEY ARE HATEFUL, THE
VERY FIRST AMENDMENT WILL VERY FIRST AMENDMENT WILL VERY FIRST AMENDMENT WILL
PROTECT VERY FIRST AMENDMENT WILL
PROTECT THESE VERY FIRST AMENDMENT WILL
PROTECT THESE SORTS VERY FIRST AMENDMENT WILL
PROTECT THESE SORTS OF VERY FIRST AMENDMENT WILL
PROTECT THESE SORTS OF THINGS. PROTECT THESE SORTS OF THINGS. PROTECT THESE SORTS OF THINGS.
AND PROTECT THESE SORTS OF THINGS.
AND SO PROTECT THESE SORTS OF THINGS.
AND SO SHARON PROTECT THESE SORTS OF THINGS.
AND SO SHARON YU PROTECT THESE SORTS OF THINGS.
AND SO SHARON YU T PROTECT THESE SORTS OF THINGS.
AND SO SHARON YU T DOWN PROTECT THESE SORTS OF THINGS.
AND SO SHARON YU T DOWN WITH AND SO SHARON YU T DOWN WITH AND SO SHARON YU T DOWN WITH
A AND SO SHARON YU T DOWN WITH
A PROFESSOR AND SO SHARON YU T DOWN WITH
A PROFESSOR TO AND SO SHARON YU T DOWN WITH
A PROFESSOR TO SEE AND SO SHARON YU T DOWN WITH
A PROFESSOR TO SEE WHAT AND SO SHARON YU T DOWN WITH
A PROFESSOR TO SEE WHAT THIS A PROFESSOR TO SEE WHAT THIS A PROFESSOR TO SEE WHAT THIS
ALL A PROFESSOR TO SEE WHAT THIS
ALL MEANS. ALL MEANS. ALL MEANS.
>>ALL MEANS.
>>Reporter: ALL MEANS.
>>Reporter: THE ALL MEANS.
>>Reporter: THE NEARLY ALL MEANS.
>>Reporter: THE NEARLY 30-PAGE>>Reporter: THE NEARLY 30-PAGE>>Reporter: THE NEARLY 30-PAGE
LEGAL>>Reporter: THE NEARLY 30-PAGE
LEGAL ENFORCEMENT>>Reporter: THE NEARLY 30-PAGE
LEGAL ENFORCEMENT GUIDANCE>>Reporter: THE NEARLY 30-PAGE
LEGAL ENFORCEMENT GUIDANCE FROM LEGAL ENFORCEMENT GUIDANCE FROM LEGAL ENFORCEMENT GUIDANCE FROM
THE LEGAL ENFORCEMENT GUIDANCE FROM
THE NEW LEGAL ENFORCEMENT GUIDANCE FROM
THE NEW YORK LEGAL ENFORCEMENT GUIDANCE FROM
THE NEW YORK CITY LEGAL ENFORCEMENT GUIDANCE FROM
THE NEW YORK CITY COMMISSION LEGAL ENFORCEMENT GUIDANCE FROM
THE NEW YORK CITY COMMISSION ON THE NEW YORK CITY COMMISSION ON THE NEW YORK CITY COMMISSION ON
HUMAN THE NEW YORK CITY COMMISSION ON
HUMAN RIGHTS THE NEW YORK CITY COMMISSION ON
HUMAN RIGHTS CLEARLY THE NEW YORK CITY COMMISSION ON
HUMAN RIGHTS CLEARLY STATES HUMAN RIGHTS CLEARLY STATES HUMAN RIGHTS CLEARLY STATES
ALIEN HUMAN RIGHTS CLEARLY STATES
ALIEN USED HUMAN RIGHTS CLEARLY STATES
ALIEN USED IN HUMAN RIGHTS CLEARLY STATES
ALIEN USED IN MANY HUMAN RIGHTS CLEARLY STATES
ALIEN USED IN MANY LAWS HUMAN RIGHTS CLEARLY STATES
ALIEN USED IN MANY LAWS TO ALIEN USED IN MANY LAWS TO ALIEN USED IN MANY LAWS TO
REFER ALIEN USED IN MANY LAWS TO
REFER TO ALIEN USED IN MANY LAWS TO
REFER TO A ALIEN USED IN MANY LAWS TO
REFER TO A NON-CITIZEN ALIEN USED IN MANY LAWS TO
REFER TO A NON-CITIZEN PERSON REFER TO A NON-CITIZEN PERSON REFER TO A NON-CITIZEN PERSON
IS REFER TO A NON-CITIZEN PERSON
IS A REFER TO A NON-CITIZEN PERSON
IS A TERM REFER TO A NON-CITIZEN PERSON
IS A TERM A REFER TO A NON-CITIZEN PERSON
IS A TERM A A REFER TO A NON-CITIZEN PERSON
IS A TERM A A THAT REFER TO A NON-CITIZEN PERSON
IS A TERM A A THAT MAY REFER TO A NON-CITIZEN PERSON
IS A TERM A A THAT MAY CARRY IS A TERM A A THAT MAY CARRY IS A TERM A A THAT MAY CARRY
NEGATIVE IS A TERM A A THAT MAY CARRY
NEGATIVE CONOTATION IS A TERM A A THAT MAY CARRY
NEGATIVE CONOTATION INCLUDING NEGATIVE CONOTATION INCLUDING NEGATIVE CONOTATION INCLUDING
ILLEGAL NEGATIVE CONOTATION INCLUDING
ILLEGAL ALIENS. ILLEGAL ALIENS. ILLEGAL ALIENS.
>>ILLEGAL ALIENS.
>>ONE ILLEGAL ALIENS.
>>ONE OF ILLEGAL ALIENS.
>>ONE OF THEM ILLEGAL ALIENS.
>>ONE OF THEM IS ILLEGAL ALIENS.
>>ONE OF THEM IS FROM ILLEGAL ALIENS.
>>ONE OF THEM IS FROM THE>>ONE OF THEM IS FROM THE>>ONE OF THEM IS FROM THE
FIRST>>ONE OF THEM IS FROM THE
FIRST AMENDMENT>>ONE OF THEM IS FROM THE
FIRST AMENDMENT POINT>>ONE OF THEM IS FROM THE
FIRST AMENDMENT POINT OF>>ONE OF THEM IS FROM THE
FIRST AMENDMENT POINT OF VIEW. FIRST AMENDMENT POINT OF VIEW. FIRST AMENDMENT POINT OF VIEW.
IS FIRST AMENDMENT POINT OF VIEW.
IS IT FIRST AMENDMENT POINT OF VIEW.
IS IT FREE FIRST AMENDMENT POINT OF VIEW.
IS IT FREE SPEECH FIRST AMENDMENT POINT OF VIEW.
IS IT FREE SPEECH TO FIRST AMENDMENT POINT OF VIEW.
IS IT FREE SPEECH TO USE? IS IT FREE SPEECH TO USE? IS IT FREE SPEECH TO USE?
YES. YES. YES.
AND YES.
AND NOW YES.
AND NOW WHETHER YES.
AND NOW WHETHER OR YES.
AND NOW WHETHER OR NOT YES.
AND NOW WHETHER OR NOT THAT YES.
AND NOW WHETHER OR NOT THAT IS AND NOW WHETHER OR NOT THAT IS AND NOW WHETHER OR NOT THAT IS
APPROPRIATE AND NOW WHETHER OR NOT THAT IS
APPROPRIATE OR AND NOW WHETHER OR NOT THAT IS
APPROPRIATE OR GOOD AND NOW WHETHER OR NOT THAT IS
APPROPRIATE OR GOOD TERMS AND NOW WHETHER OR NOT THAT IS
APPROPRIATE OR GOOD TERMS TO APPROPRIATE OR GOOD TERMS TO APPROPRIATE OR GOOD TERMS TO
USE, APPROPRIATE OR GOOD TERMS TO
USE, THAT APPROPRIATE OR GOOD TERMS TO
USE, THAT IS APPROPRIATE OR GOOD TERMS TO
USE, THAT IS A APPROPRIATE OR GOOD TERMS TO
USE, THAT IS A MATTER APPROPRIATE OR GOOD TERMS TO
USE, THAT IS A MATTER OF APPROPRIATE OR GOOD TERMS TO
USE, THAT IS A MATTER OF DEBATE USE, THAT IS A MATTER OF DEBATE USE, THAT IS A MATTER OF DEBATE
HERE. HERE. HERE.
SHOULD HERE.
SHOULD PEOPLE HERE.
SHOULD PEOPLE USE HERE.
SHOULD PEOPLE USE THE HERE.
SHOULD PEOPLE USE THE TERMS HERE.
SHOULD PEOPLE USE THE TERMS OR SHOULD PEOPLE USE THE TERMS OR SHOULD PEOPLE USE THE TERMS OR
NOT? NOT? NOT?
AGAIN, NOT?
AGAIN, IT’S NOT?
AGAIN, IT’S A NOT?
AGAIN, IT’S A MATTER NOT?
AGAIN, IT’S A MATTER OF NOT?
AGAIN, IT’S A MATTER OF DEBATE AGAIN, IT’S A MATTER OF DEBATE AGAIN, IT’S A MATTER OF DEBATE
AND AGAIN, IT’S A MATTER OF DEBATE
AND CLEARLY AGAIN, IT’S A MATTER OF DEBATE
AND CLEARLY SPEECH AGAIN, IT’S A MATTER OF DEBATE
AND CLEARLY SPEECH LIKE AGAIN, IT’S A MATTER OF DEBATE
AND CLEARLY SPEECH LIKE THAT AGAIN, IT’S A MATTER OF DEBATE
AND CLEARLY SPEECH LIKE THAT IS AND CLEARLY SPEECH LIKE THAT IS AND CLEARLY SPEECH LIKE THAT IS
PROTECTED AND CLEARLY SPEECH LIKE THAT IS
PROTECTED UNDER AND CLEARLY SPEECH LIKE THAT IS
PROTECTED UNDER THE AND CLEARLY SPEECH LIKE THAT IS
PROTECTED UNDER THE FIRST PROTECTED UNDER THE FIRST PROTECTED UNDER THE FIRST
AMENDMENT. AMENDMENT. AMENDMENT.
>>AMENDMENT.
>>THE AMENDMENT.
>>THE FOCUS AMENDMENT.
>>THE FOCUS OF AMENDMENT.
>>THE FOCUS OF THE AMENDMENT.
>>THE FOCUS OF THE DOCUMENT AMENDMENT.
>>THE FOCUS OF THE DOCUMENT IS>>THE FOCUS OF THE DOCUMENT IS>>THE FOCUS OF THE DOCUMENT IS
REALLY>>THE FOCUS OF THE DOCUMENT IS
REALLY ON>>THE FOCUS OF THE DOCUMENT IS
REALLY ON THE>>THE FOCUS OF THE DOCUMENT IS
REALLY ON THE INTENT>>THE FOCUS OF THE DOCUMENT IS
REALLY ON THE INTENT BEHIND>>THE FOCUS OF THE DOCUMENT IS
REALLY ON THE INTENT BEHIND THE REALLY ON THE INTENT BEHIND THE REALLY ON THE INTENT BEHIND THE
WORDS REALLY ON THE INTENT BEHIND THE
WORDS AND REALLY ON THE INTENT BEHIND THE
WORDS AND THAT REALLY ON THE INTENT BEHIND THE
WORDS AND THAT THEY REALLY ON THE INTENT BEHIND THE
WORDS AND THAT THEY HAVE REALLY ON THE INTENT BEHIND THE
WORDS AND THAT THEY HAVE BEEN WORDS AND THAT THEY HAVE BEEN WORDS AND THAT THEY HAVE BEEN
ILLEGAL WORDS AND THAT THEY HAVE BEEN
ILLEGAL IN WORDS AND THAT THEY HAVE BEEN
ILLEGAL IN NEW WORDS AND THAT THEY HAVE BEEN
ILLEGAL IN NEW YORK WORDS AND THAT THEY HAVE BEEN
ILLEGAL IN NEW YORK CITY WORDS AND THAT THEY HAVE BEEN
ILLEGAL IN NEW YORK CITY FOR ILLEGAL IN NEW YORK CITY FOR ILLEGAL IN NEW YORK CITY FOR
DECADES. DECADES. DECADES.
BUT DECADES.
BUT THE DECADES.
BUT THE NEW DECADES.
BUT THE NEW INFORMATION DECADES.
BUT THE NEW INFORMATION ADDED BUT THE NEW INFORMATION ADDED BUT THE NEW INFORMATION ADDED
SHOWS BUT THE NEW INFORMATION ADDED
SHOWS EXAMPLES BUT THE NEW INFORMATION ADDED
SHOWS EXAMPLES OF BUT THE NEW INFORMATION ADDED
SHOWS EXAMPLES OF WHAT BUT THE NEW INFORMATION ADDED
SHOWS EXAMPLES OF WHAT MIGHT BUT THE NEW INFORMATION ADDED
SHOWS EXAMPLES OF WHAT MIGHT GO SHOWS EXAMPLES OF WHAT MIGHT GO SHOWS EXAMPLES OF WHAT MIGHT GO
AGAINST SHOWS EXAMPLES OF WHAT MIGHT GO
AGAINST THE SHOWS EXAMPLES OF WHAT MIGHT GO
AGAINST THE LAW. AGAINST THE LAW. AGAINST THE LAW.
THE AGAINST THE LAW.
THE PROFESSOR AGAINST THE LAW.
THE PROFESSOR POSES AGAINST THE LAW.
THE PROFESSOR POSES AN THE PROFESSOR POSES AN THE PROFESSOR POSES AN
INTERESTING THE PROFESSOR POSES AN
INTERESTING QUESTION. INTERESTING QUESTION. INTERESTING QUESTION.
>>INTERESTING QUESTION.
>>ARE INTERESTING QUESTION.
>>ARE WE INTERESTING QUESTION.
>>ARE WE REALLY INTERESTING QUESTION.
>>ARE WE REALLY ROOTING INTERESTING QUESTION.
>>ARE WE REALLY ROOTING OUT>>ARE WE REALLY ROOTING OUT>>ARE WE REALLY ROOTING OUT
DISCRIMINATION>>ARE WE REALLY ROOTING OUT
DISCRIMINATION IF>>ARE WE REALLY ROOTING OUT
DISCRIMINATION IF WE>>ARE WE REALLY ROOTING OUT
DISCRIMINATION IF WE TELL DISCRIMINATION IF WE TELL DISCRIMINATION IF WE TELL
PEOPLE DISCRIMINATION IF WE TELL
PEOPLE YOU DISCRIMINATION IF WE TELL
PEOPLE YOU CAN’T DISCRIMINATION IF WE TELL
PEOPLE YOU CAN’T SAY DISCRIMINATION IF WE TELL
PEOPLE YOU CAN’T SAY OR DISCRIMINATION IF WE TELL
PEOPLE YOU CAN’T SAY OR THINK PEOPLE YOU CAN’T SAY OR THINK PEOPLE YOU CAN’T SAY OR THINK
CERTAIN PEOPLE YOU CAN’T SAY OR THINK
CERTAIN THINGS? CERTAIN THINGS? CERTAIN THINGS?
THAT CERTAIN THINGS?
THAT YOU CERTAIN THINGS?
THAT YOU CAN’T CERTAIN THINGS?
THAT YOU CAN’T REALLY CERTAIN THINGS?
THAT YOU CAN’T REALLY FORCE THAT YOU CAN’T REALLY FORCE THAT YOU CAN’T REALLY FORCE
PEOPLE THAT YOU CAN’T REALLY FORCE
PEOPLE TO THAT YOU CAN’T REALLY FORCE
PEOPLE TO BE THAT YOU CAN’T REALLY FORCE
PEOPLE TO BE NICE. PEOPLE TO BE NICE. PEOPLE TO BE NICE.
YOU PEOPLE TO BE NICE.
YOU CAN’T PEOPLE TO BE NICE.
YOU CAN’T FORCE PEOPLE TO BE NICE.
YOU CAN’T FORCE PEOPLE PEOPLE TO BE NICE.
YOU CAN’T FORCE PEOPLE TO PEOPLE TO BE NICE.
YOU CAN’T FORCE PEOPLE TO BE YOU CAN’T FORCE PEOPLE TO BE YOU CAN’T FORCE PEOPLE TO BE
NONDISCRIMINATORY. NONDISCRIMINATORY. NONDISCRIMINATORY.
>>NONDISCRIMINATORY.
>>ON NONDISCRIMINATORY.
>>ON PAGE NONDISCRIMINATORY.
>>ON PAGE 22 NONDISCRIMINATORY.
>>ON PAGE 22 IT NONDISCRIMINATORY.
>>ON PAGE 22 IT SHOWS NONDISCRIMINATORY.
>>ON PAGE 22 IT SHOWS A NONDISCRIMINATORY.
>>ON PAGE 22 IT SHOWS A BUS>>ON PAGE 22 IT SHOWS A BUS>>ON PAGE 22 IT SHOWS A BUS
DRIVER>>ON PAGE 22 IT SHOWS A BUS
DRIVER VOLUNTARILY>>ON PAGE 22 IT SHOWS A BUS
DRIVER VOLUNTARILY IDENTIFYING DRIVER VOLUNTARILY IDENTIFYING DRIVER VOLUNTARILY IDENTIFYING
TO DRIVER VOLUNTARILY IDENTIFYING
TO FEDERAL DRIVER VOLUNTARILY IDENTIFYING
TO FEDERAL IMMIGRATION TO FEDERAL IMMIGRATION TO FEDERAL IMMIGRATION
AUTHORITIES TO FEDERAL IMMIGRATION
AUTHORITIES PASSENGERS TO FEDERAL IMMIGRATION
AUTHORITIES PASSENGERS WHOM TO FEDERAL IMMIGRATION
AUTHORITIES PASSENGERS WHOM HE AUTHORITIES PASSENGERS WHOM HE AUTHORITIES PASSENGERS WHOM HE
BELIEVES AUTHORITIES PASSENGERS WHOM HE
BELIEVES ARE AUTHORITIES PASSENGERS WHOM HE
BELIEVES ARE FOREIGNERS AUTHORITIES PASSENGERS WHOM HE
BELIEVES ARE FOREIGNERS AND BELIEVES ARE FOREIGNERS AND BELIEVES ARE FOREIGNERS AND
ASKING BELIEVES ARE FOREIGNERS AND
ASKING THE BELIEVES ARE FOREIGNERS AND
ASKING THE AGENT BELIEVES ARE FOREIGNERS AND
ASKING THE AGENT TO BELIEVES ARE FOREIGNERS AND
ASKING THE AGENT TO GO BELIEVES ARE FOREIGNERS AND
ASKING THE AGENT TO GO AHEAD ASKING THE AGENT TO GO AHEAD ASKING THE AGENT TO GO AHEAD
AND ASKING THE AGENT TO GO AHEAD
AND ROUND ASKING THE AGENT TO GO AHEAD
AND ROUND UP ASKING THE AGENT TO GO AHEAD
AND ROUND UP THE ASKING THE AGENT TO GO AHEAD
AND ROUND UP THE ILLEGALS ASKING THE AGENT TO GO AHEAD
AND ROUND UP THE ILLEGALS IS ASKING THE AGENT TO GO AHEAD
AND ROUND UP THE ILLEGALS IS A AND ROUND UP THE ILLEGALS IS A AND ROUND UP THE ILLEGALS IS A
VIOLATION AND ROUND UP THE ILLEGALS IS A
VIOLATION OF AND ROUND UP THE ILLEGALS IS A
VIOLATION OF THE AND ROUND UP THE ILLEGALS IS A
VIOLATION OF THE LAW. VIOLATION OF THE LAW. VIOLATION OF THE LAW.
SO VIOLATION OF THE LAW.
SO IS VIOLATION OF THE LAW.
SO IS TELLING VIOLATION OF THE LAW.
SO IS TELLING A VIOLATION OF THE LAW.
SO IS TELLING A CUSTOMER VIOLATION OF THE LAW.
SO IS TELLING A CUSTOMER TO SO IS TELLING A CUSTOMER TO SO IS TELLING A CUSTOMER TO
SPEAK SO IS TELLING A CUSTOMER TO
SPEAK ENGLISH SO IS TELLING A CUSTOMER TO
SPEAK ENGLISH AND SO IS TELLING A CUSTOMER TO
SPEAK ENGLISH AND GO SO IS TELLING A CUSTOMER TO
SPEAK ENGLISH AND GO BACK SO IS TELLING A CUSTOMER TO
SPEAK ENGLISH AND GO BACK TO SPEAK ENGLISH AND GO BACK TO SPEAK ENGLISH AND GO BACK TO
YOUR SPEAK ENGLISH AND GO BACK TO
YOUR COUNTRY. YOUR COUNTRY. YOUR COUNTRY.
>>YOUR COUNTRY.
>>AND YOUR COUNTRY.
>>AND DOES YOUR COUNTRY.
>>AND DOES THIS YOUR COUNTRY.
>>AND DOES THIS WORRY YOUR COUNTRY.
>>AND DOES THIS WORRY YOU YOUR COUNTRY.
>>AND DOES THIS WORRY YOU AT>>AND DOES THIS WORRY YOU AT>>AND DOES THIS WORRY YOU AT
ALL>>AND DOES THIS WORRY YOU AT
ALL THAT>>AND DOES THIS WORRY YOU AT
ALL THAT IT>>AND DOES THIS WORRY YOU AT
ALL THAT IT IS>>AND DOES THIS WORRY YOU AT
ALL THAT IT IS A>>AND DOES THIS WORRY YOU AT
ALL THAT IT IS A SLIPPERY ALL THAT IT IS A SLIPPERY ALL THAT IT IS A SLIPPERY
SLOPE? SLOPE? SLOPE?
>>SLOPE?
>>YES, SLOPE?
>>YES, IT SLOPE?
>>YES, IT DOES.>>YES, IT DOES.>>YES, IT DOES.
TODAY>>YES, IT DOES.
TODAY IT>>YES, IT DOES.
TODAY IT IS>>YES, IT DOES.
TODAY IT IS ILLEGAL>>YES, IT DOES.
TODAY IT IS ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT TODAY IT IS ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT TODAY IT IS ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT
OR TODAY IT IS ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT
OR ILLEGAL TODAY IT IS ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT
OR ILLEGAL ALIEN. OR ILLEGAL ALIEN. OR ILLEGAL ALIEN.
TOMORROW OR ILLEGAL ALIEN.
TOMORROW IT OR ILLEGAL ALIEN.
TOMORROW IT IS OR ILLEGAL ALIEN.
TOMORROW IT IS SOMEBODY OR ILLEGAL ALIEN.
TOMORROW IT IS SOMEBODY TAKES TOMORROW IT IS SOMEBODY TAKES TOMORROW IT IS SOMEBODY TAKES
OFFENSE TOMORROW IT IS SOMEBODY TAKES
OFFENSE AT TOMORROW IT IS SOMEBODY TAKES
OFFENSE AT THE TOMORROW IT IS SOMEBODY TAKES
OFFENSE AT THE WORD TOMORROW IT IS SOMEBODY TAKES
OFFENSE AT THE WORD ITALIAN- OFFENSE AT THE WORD ITALIAN- OFFENSE AT THE WORD ITALIAN-
AMERICAN OFFENSE AT THE WORD ITALIAN-
AMERICAN OR OFFENSE AT THE WORD ITALIAN-
AMERICAN OR MONG-AMERICAN OFFENSE AT THE WORD ITALIAN-
AMERICAN OR MONG-AMERICAN OR AMERICAN OR MONG-AMERICAN OR AMERICAN OR MONG-AMERICAN OR
FILL AMERICAN OR MONG-AMERICAN OR
FILL IN AMERICAN OR MONG-AMERICAN OR
FILL IN THE AMERICAN OR MONG-AMERICAN OR
FILL IN THE BLANK AMERICAN OR MONG-AMERICAN OR
FILL IN THE BLANK AND AMERICAN OR MONG-AMERICAN OR
FILL IN THE BLANK AND AT AMERICAN OR MONG-AMERICAN OR
FILL IN THE BLANK AND AT WHAT FILL IN THE BLANK AND AT WHAT FILL IN THE BLANK AND AT WHAT
POINT FILL IN THE BLANK AND AT WHAT
POINT DOES FILL IN THE BLANK AND AT WHAT
POINT DOES THIS FILL IN THE BLANK AND AT WHAT
POINT DOES THIS BECOME FILL IN THE BLANK AND AT WHAT
POINT DOES THIS BECOME A POINT DOES THIS BECOME A POINT DOES THIS BECOME A
PROBLEM? PROBLEM? PROBLEM?
>>PROBLEM?
>>IF PROBLEM?
>>IF YOU PROBLEM?
>>IF YOU ARE PROBLEM?
>>IF YOU ARE IN PROBLEM?
>>IF YOU ARE IN VIOLATION PROBLEM?
>>IF YOU ARE IN VIOLATION OF>>IF YOU ARE IN VIOLATION OF>>IF YOU ARE IN VIOLATION OF
THE>>IF YOU ARE IN VIOLATION OF
THE HUMAN>>IF YOU ARE IN VIOLATION OF
THE HUMAN RIGHTS>>IF YOU ARE IN VIOLATION OF
THE HUMAN RIGHTS LAW,>>IF YOU ARE IN VIOLATION OF
THE HUMAN RIGHTS LAW, IT>>IF YOU ARE IN VIOLATION OF
THE HUMAN RIGHTS LAW, IT WILL THE HUMAN RIGHTS LAW, IT WILL THE HUMAN RIGHTS LAW, IT WILL
BE THE HUMAN RIGHTS LAW, IT WILL
BE PUNISHABLE THE HUMAN RIGHTS LAW, IT WILL
BE PUNISHABLE BY THE HUMAN RIGHTS LAW, IT WILL
BE PUNISHABLE BY FINES THE HUMAN RIGHTS LAW, IT WILL
BE PUNISHABLE BY FINES OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS LAW, IT WILL
BE PUNISHABLE BY FINES OF UP THE HUMAN RIGHTS LAW, IT WILL
BE PUNISHABLE BY FINES OF UP TO BE PUNISHABLE BY FINES OF UP TO BE PUNISHABLE BY FINES OF UP TO
$250,000. $250,000. $250,000.
AND $250,000.
AND THE $250,000.
AND THE THING $250,000.
AND THE THING THAT $250,000.
AND THE THING THAT I $250,000.
AND THE THING THAT I GET, $250,000.
AND THE THING THAT I GET, YEAH, AND THE THING THAT I GET, YEAH, AND THE THING THAT I GET, YEAH,
THE AND THE THING THAT I GET, YEAH,
THE THING AND THE THING THAT I GET, YEAH,
THE THING THAT AND THE THING THAT I GET, YEAH,
THE THING THAT I AND THE THING THAT I GET, YEAH,
THE THING THAT I WOULD AND THE THING THAT I GET, YEAH,
THE THING THAT I WOULD GATHER THE THING THAT I WOULD GATHER THE THING THAT I WOULD GATHER
FROM THE THING THAT I WOULD GATHER
FROM THIS THE THING THAT I WOULD GATHER
FROM THIS AND THE THING THAT I WOULD GATHER
FROM THIS AND THAT THE THING THAT I WOULD GATHER
FROM THIS AND THAT AT THE THING THAT I WOULD GATHER
FROM THIS AND THAT AT THIS FROM THIS AND THAT AT THIS FROM THIS AND THAT AT THIS
POINT FROM THIS AND THAT AT THIS
POINT IT FROM THIS AND THAT AT THIS
POINT IT SEEMS FROM THIS AND THAT AT THIS
POINT IT SEEMS LIKE FROM THIS AND THAT AT THIS
POINT IT SEEMS LIKE IT FROM THIS AND THAT AT THIS
POINT IT SEEMS LIKE IT WILL FROM THIS AND THAT AT THIS
POINT IT SEEMS LIKE IT WILL BE POINT IT SEEMS LIKE IT WILL BE POINT IT SEEMS LIKE IT WILL BE
MORE POINT IT SEEMS LIKE IT WILL BE
MORE OF POINT IT SEEMS LIKE IT WILL BE
MORE OF A POINT IT SEEMS LIKE IT WILL BE
MORE OF A REPORT POINT IT SEEMS LIKE IT WILL BE
MORE OF A REPORT AND POINT IT SEEMS LIKE IT WILL BE
MORE OF A REPORT AND THEN MORE OF A REPORT AND THEN MORE OF A REPORT AND THEN
ACTION MORE OF A REPORT AND THEN
ACTION KIND MORE OF A REPORT AND THEN
ACTION KIND OF MORE OF A REPORT AND THEN
ACTION KIND OF DEAL MORE OF A REPORT AND THEN
ACTION KIND OF DEAL AND MORE OF A REPORT AND THEN
ACTION KIND OF DEAL AND IT ACTION KIND OF DEAL AND IT ACTION KIND OF DEAL AND IT
SEEMS ACTION KIND OF DEAL AND IT
SEEMS A ACTION KIND OF DEAL AND IT
SEEMS A LITTLE ACTION KIND OF DEAL AND IT
SEEMS A LITTLE TRICKY ACTION KIND OF DEAL AND IT
SEEMS A LITTLE TRICKY TO ACTION KIND OF DEAL AND IT
SEEMS A LITTLE TRICKY TO ME. SEEMS A LITTLE TRICKY TO ME. SEEMS A LITTLE TRICKY TO ME.
I SEEMS A LITTLE TRICKY TO ME.
I DIDN’T SEEMS A LITTLE TRICKY TO ME.
I DIDN’T SEE SEEMS A LITTLE TRICKY TO ME.
I DIDN’T SEE ANYTHING SEEMS A LITTLE TRICKY TO ME.
I DIDN’T SEE ANYTHING IN SEEMS A LITTLE TRICKY TO ME.
I DIDN’T SEE ANYTHING IN THERE I DIDN’T SEE ANYTHING IN THERE I DIDN’T SEE ANYTHING IN THERE
ABOUT I DIDN’T SEE ANYTHING IN THERE
ABOUT HOW I DIDN’T SEE ANYTHING IN THERE
ABOUT HOW EXACTLY I DIDN’T SEE ANYTHING IN THERE
ABOUT HOW EXACTLY THEY I DIDN’T SEE ANYTHING IN THERE
ABOUT HOW EXACTLY THEY WERE ABOUT HOW EXACTLY THEY WERE ABOUT HOW EXACTLY THEY WERE
GOING ABOUT HOW EXACTLY THEY WERE
GOING TO ABOUT HOW EXACTLY THEY WERE
GOING TO GO ABOUT HOW EXACTLY THEY WERE
GOING TO GO ABOUT

5 thoughts on “NYC Human Rights Commission says terms “Illegals” and “Illegal Alien” are discriminatory

  1. Laws…compelled speech? Move to an authoritative government where they have this and see what you think. Those of us who fled that to come to the USA know this.

  2. This law will be shot down in court. The legal term, as per Federal law is illegal alien – not undocumented immigrant or illegal immigrant both of which are an oxymoron as immigrant equates to legal. Illegal alien is referenced numerous times, but a clear definition can be found within "United States Code, Title 8, §1365(b)".

  3. That’s ridiculous! It’s absolutely NOT discrimination. If you break laws we don’t care what color, race or religion you are. It’s a description of their legal status and the facts they breached our national borders at will. Now start enforcing our laws and stop spending tax dollars trying to circumvent and weaken them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *