AZ Dem chair brushes off bid to censure Sinema


>>>>>>WELCOME>>>WELCOME BACK>>>WELCOME BACK TO>>>WELCOME BACK TO SUNDAY>>>WELCOME BACK TO SUNDAY
SQUARE>>>WELCOME BACK TO SUNDAY
SQUARE OFF>>>WELCOME BACK TO SUNDAY
SQUARE OFF AND>>>WELCOME BACK TO SUNDAY
SQUARE OFF AND OUR>>>WELCOME BACK TO SUNDAY
SQUARE OFF AND OUR EXCLUSIVE SQUARE OFF AND OUR EXCLUSIVE SQUARE OFF AND OUR EXCLUSIVE
CONVERSATION SQUARE OFF AND OUR EXCLUSIVE
CONVERSATION WITH SQUARE OFF AND OUR EXCLUSIVE
CONVERSATION WITH THE SQUARE OFF AND OUR EXCLUSIVE
CONVERSATION WITH THE CHAIRMAN CONVERSATION WITH THE CHAIRMAN CONVERSATION WITH THE CHAIRMAN
OF CONVERSATION WITH THE CHAIRMAN
OF THE CONVERSATION WITH THE CHAIRMAN
OF THE ARIZONA CONVERSATION WITH THE CHAIRMAN
OF THE ARIZONA REPUBLICAN CONVERSATION WITH THE CHAIRMAN
OF THE ARIZONA REPUBLICAN PARTY OF THE ARIZONA REPUBLICAN PARTY OF THE ARIZONA REPUBLICAN PARTY
KELLI OF THE ARIZONA REPUBLICAN PARTY
KELLI WARD. KELLI WARD. REPUBLICAN REPUBLICAN MARTHA REPUBLICAN MARTHA McSALLY REPUBLICAN MARTHA McSALLY IS REPUBLICAN MARTHA McSALLY IS
BEING REPUBLICAN MARTHA McSALLY IS
BEING PRIMARYED. BEING PRIMARYED. BEING PRIMARYED.
KYRSTEN BEING PRIMARYED.
KYRSTEN SINEMA BEING PRIMARYED.
KYRSTEN SINEMA DODGED BEING PRIMARYED.
KYRSTEN SINEMA DODGED A BEING PRIMARYED.
KYRSTEN SINEMA DODGED A CENTURE KYRSTEN SINEMA DODGED A CENTURE KYRSTEN SINEMA DODGED A CENTURE
VOTE KYRSTEN SINEMA DODGED A CENTURE
VOTE BY KYRSTEN SINEMA DODGED A CENTURE
VOTE BY HER KYRSTEN SINEMA DODGED A CENTURE
VOTE BY HER OWN KYRSTEN SINEMA DODGED A CENTURE
VOTE BY HER OWN PARTY. VOTE BY HER OWN PARTY. VOTE BY HER OWN PARTY.
FELICIA VOTE BY HER OWN PARTY.
FELICIA ROTELLINI, VOTE BY HER OWN PARTY.
FELICIA ROTELLINI, IT VOTE BY HER OWN PARTY.
FELICIA ROTELLINI, IT WAS FELICIA ROTELLINI, IT WAS FELICIA ROTELLINI, IT WAS
POSTPONED FELICIA ROTELLINI, IT WAS
POSTPONED TILL FELICIA ROTELLINI, IT WAS
POSTPONED TILL JANUARY. POSTPONED TILL JANUARY. POSTPONED TILL JANUARY.
THE POSTPONED TILL JANUARY.
THE PROGRESSIVE POSTPONED TILL JANUARY.
THE PROGRESSIVE PARTY POSTPONED TILL JANUARY.
THE PROGRESSIVE PARTY ARGUES POSTPONED TILL JANUARY.
THE PROGRESSIVE PARTY ARGUES SHE THE PROGRESSIVE PARTY ARGUES SHE THE PROGRESSIVE PARTY ARGUES SHE
ISN’T THE PROGRESSIVE PARTY ARGUES SHE
ISN’T TOUGH THE PROGRESSIVE PARTY ARGUES SHE
ISN’T TOUGH ON THE PROGRESSIVE PARTY ARGUES SHE
ISN’T TOUGH ON PRESIDENT THE PROGRESSIVE PARTY ARGUES SHE
ISN’T TOUGH ON PRESIDENT TRUMP. ISN’T TOUGH ON PRESIDENT TRUMP. ISN’T TOUGH ON PRESIDENT TRUMP.
SHE ISN’T TOUGH ON PRESIDENT TRUMP.
SHE IDENTIFIED ISN’T TOUGH ON PRESIDENT TRUMP.
SHE IDENTIFIED HERSELF ISN’T TOUGH ON PRESIDENT TRUMP.
SHE IDENTIFIED HERSELF AS ISN’T TOUGH ON PRESIDENT TRUMP.
SHE IDENTIFIED HERSELF AS A SHE IDENTIFIED HERSELF AS A SHE IDENTIFIED HERSELF AS A
DEMOCRAT SHE IDENTIFIED HERSELF AS A
DEMOCRAT WHEN SHE IDENTIFIED HERSELF AS A
DEMOCRAT WHEN SHE SHE IDENTIFIED HERSELF AS A
DEMOCRAT WHEN SHE RAN. DEMOCRAT WHEN SHE RAN. DEMOCRAT WHEN SHE RAN.
DO DEMOCRAT WHEN SHE RAN.
DO YOU DEMOCRAT WHEN SHE RAN.
DO YOU WANT DEMOCRAT WHEN SHE RAN.
DO YOU WANT TO DEMOCRAT WHEN SHE RAN.
DO YOU WANT TO SEE DEMOCRAT WHEN SHE RAN.
DO YOU WANT TO SEE HER DEMOCRAT WHEN SHE RAN.
DO YOU WANT TO SEE HER STAND DEMOCRAT WHEN SHE RAN.
DO YOU WANT TO SEE HER STAND UP DO YOU WANT TO SEE HER STAND UP DO YOU WANT TO SEE HER STAND UP
TO DO YOU WANT TO SEE HER STAND UP
TO THE DO YOU WANT TO SEE HER STAND UP
TO THE PRESIDENT DO YOU WANT TO SEE HER STAND UP
TO THE PRESIDENT AND DO YOU WANT TO SEE HER STAND UP
TO THE PRESIDENT AND MORE DO YOU WANT TO SEE HER STAND UP
TO THE PRESIDENT AND MORE AS DO YOU WANT TO SEE HER STAND UP
TO THE PRESIDENT AND MORE AS A TO THE PRESIDENT AND MORE AS A TO THE PRESIDENT AND MORE AS A
DEMOCRAT? DEMOCRAT? DEMOCRAT?
>>DEMOCRAT?
>>I DEMOCRAT?
>>I THINK DEMOCRAT?
>>I THINK SHE DEMOCRAT?
>>I THINK SHE HAS DEMOCRAT?
>>I THINK SHE HAS A DEMOCRAT?
>>I THINK SHE HAS A HIGH>>I THINK SHE HAS A HIGH>>I THINK SHE HAS A HIGH
APPROVAL>>I THINK SHE HAS A HIGH
APPROVAL RATING>>I THINK SHE HAS A HIGH
APPROVAL RATING BECAUSE>>I THINK SHE HAS A HIGH
APPROVAL RATING BECAUSE SHE’S APPROVAL RATING BECAUSE SHE’S APPROVAL RATING BECAUSE SHE’S
DOING APPROVAL RATING BECAUSE SHE’S
DOING EXACTLY APPROVAL RATING BECAUSE SHE’S
DOING EXACTLY WHAT APPROVAL RATING BECAUSE SHE’S
DOING EXACTLY WHAT SHE APPROVAL RATING BECAUSE SHE’S
DOING EXACTLY WHAT SHE SAID APPROVAL RATING BECAUSE SHE’S
DOING EXACTLY WHAT SHE SAID SHE DOING EXACTLY WHAT SHE SAID SHE DOING EXACTLY WHAT SHE SAID SHE
WAS DOING EXACTLY WHAT SHE SAID SHE
WAS GOING DOING EXACTLY WHAT SHE SAID SHE
WAS GOING TO DOING EXACTLY WHAT SHE SAID SHE
WAS GOING TO DO DOING EXACTLY WHAT SHE SAID SHE
WAS GOING TO DO WHEN DOING EXACTLY WHAT SHE SAID SHE
WAS GOING TO DO WHEN SHE DOING EXACTLY WHAT SHE SAID SHE
WAS GOING TO DO WHEN SHE RAN DOING EXACTLY WHAT SHE SAID SHE
WAS GOING TO DO WHEN SHE RAN FOR WAS GOING TO DO WHEN SHE RAN FOR WAS GOING TO DO WHEN SHE RAN FOR
OFFICE WAS GOING TO DO WHEN SHE RAN FOR
OFFICE IN WAS GOING TO DO WHEN SHE RAN FOR
OFFICE IN 2018. OFFICE IN 2018. OFFICE IN 2018.
SHE OFFICE IN 2018.
SHE REPRESENTING OFFICE IN 2018.
SHE REPRESENTING THE OFFICE IN 2018.
SHE REPRESENTING THE ENTIRE SHE REPRESENTING THE ENTIRE SHE REPRESENTING THE ENTIRE
STATE SHE REPRESENTING THE ENTIRE
STATE AND SHE REPRESENTING THE ENTIRE
STATE AND ALL SHE REPRESENTING THE ENTIRE
STATE AND ALL OF SHE REPRESENTING THE ENTIRE
STATE AND ALL OF THE STATE AND ALL OF THE STATE AND ALL OF THE
CONSTITUENCY STATE AND ALL OF THE
CONSTITUENCY OF STATE AND ALL OF THE
CONSTITUENCY OF THE STATE AND ALL OF THE
CONSTITUENCY OF THE STATE. CONSTITUENCY OF THE STATE. CONSTITUENCY OF THE STATE.
THE CONSTITUENCY OF THE STATE.
THE PROGRESSIVES, CONSTITUENCY OF THE STATE.
THE PROGRESSIVES, THEY CONSTITUENCY OF THE STATE.
THE PROGRESSIVES, THEY BROUGHT THE PROGRESSIVES, THEY BROUGHT THE PROGRESSIVES, THEY BROUGHT
US THE PROGRESSIVES, THEY BROUGHT
US SOCIAL THE PROGRESSIVES, THEY BROUGHT
US SOCIAL SECURITY, THE PROGRESSIVES, THEY BROUGHT
US SOCIAL SECURITY, MARRIAGE US SOCIAL SECURITY, MARRIAGE US SOCIAL SECURITY, MARRIAGE
EQUALITY, US SOCIAL SECURITY, MARRIAGE
EQUALITY, THEY US SOCIAL SECURITY, MARRIAGE
EQUALITY, THEY HAVE US SOCIAL SECURITY, MARRIAGE
EQUALITY, THEY HAVE A US SOCIAL SECURITY, MARRIAGE
EQUALITY, THEY HAVE A DIFFERENT EQUALITY, THEY HAVE A DIFFERENT EQUALITY, THEY HAVE A DIFFERENT
VIEWPOINT, EQUALITY, THEY HAVE A DIFFERENT
VIEWPOINT, AND EQUALITY, THEY HAVE A DIFFERENT
VIEWPOINT, AND QUITE EQUALITY, THEY HAVE A DIFFERENT
VIEWPOINT, AND QUITE FRANKLY EQUALITY, THEY HAVE A DIFFERENT
VIEWPOINT, AND QUITE FRANKLY I’M VIEWPOINT, AND QUITE FRANKLY I’M VIEWPOINT, AND QUITE FRANKLY I’M
OF VIEWPOINT, AND QUITE FRANKLY I’M
OF THE VIEWPOINT, AND QUITE FRANKLY I’M
OF THE BELIEF VIEWPOINT, AND QUITE FRANKLY I’M
OF THE BELIEF THAT VIEWPOINT, AND QUITE FRANKLY I’M
OF THE BELIEF THAT IF VIEWPOINT, AND QUITE FRANKLY I’M
OF THE BELIEF THAT IF EVERYBODY OF THE BELIEF THAT IF EVERYBODY OF THE BELIEF THAT IF EVERYBODY
IS OF THE BELIEF THAT IF EVERYBODY
IS THINKING OF THE BELIEF THAT IF EVERYBODY
IS THINKING THE OF THE BELIEF THAT IF EVERYBODY
IS THINKING THE SAME, OF THE BELIEF THAT IF EVERYBODY
IS THINKING THE SAME, THEN IS THINKING THE SAME, THEN IS THINKING THE SAME, THEN
SOMEBODY IS THINKING THE SAME, THEN
SOMEBODY IS IS THINKING THE SAME, THEN
SOMEBODY IS NOT IS THINKING THE SAME, THEN
SOMEBODY IS NOT THINKING IS THINKING THE SAME, THEN
SOMEBODY IS NOT THINKING AND IS THINKING THE SAME, THEN
SOMEBODY IS NOT THINKING AND I SOMEBODY IS NOT THINKING AND I SOMEBODY IS NOT THINKING AND I
DON’T SOMEBODY IS NOT THINKING AND I
DON’T WANT SOMEBODY IS NOT THINKING AND I
DON’T WANT TO SOMEBODY IS NOT THINKING AND I
DON’T WANT TO BE SOMEBODY IS NOT THINKING AND I
DON’T WANT TO BE A SOMEBODY IS NOT THINKING AND I
DON’T WANT TO BE A PART SOMEBODY IS NOT THINKING AND I
DON’T WANT TO BE A PART OF SOMEBODY IS NOT THINKING AND I
DON’T WANT TO BE A PART OF THAT DON’T WANT TO BE A PART OF THAT DON’T WANT TO BE A PART OF THAT
PARTY. PARTY. PARTY.
WHAT PARTY.
WHAT WE PARTY.
WHAT WE HAVE PARTY.
WHAT WE HAVE IN PARTY.
WHAT WE HAVE IN THE PARTY.
WHAT WE HAVE IN THE DEMOCRATIC WHAT WE HAVE IN THE DEMOCRATIC WHAT WE HAVE IN THE DEMOCRATIC
PARTY WHAT WE HAVE IN THE DEMOCRATIC
PARTY IS WHAT WE HAVE IN THE DEMOCRATIC
PARTY IS A WHAT WE HAVE IN THE DEMOCRATIC
PARTY IS A DIVERSITY WHAT WE HAVE IN THE DEMOCRATIC
PARTY IS A DIVERSITY OF WHAT WE HAVE IN THE DEMOCRATIC
PARTY IS A DIVERSITY OF PERSON PARTY IS A DIVERSITY OF PERSON PARTY IS A DIVERSITY OF PERSON
AND PARTY IS A DIVERSITY OF PERSON
AND A PARTY IS A DIVERSITY OF PERSON
AND A DIVERSITY PARTY IS A DIVERSITY OF PERSON
AND A DIVERSITY OF PARTY IS A DIVERSITY OF PERSON
AND A DIVERSITY OF PERCEPTION AND A DIVERSITY OF PERCEPTION AND A DIVERSITY OF PERCEPTION
AND AND A DIVERSITY OF PERCEPTION
AND INTEREST AND A DIVERSITY OF PERCEPTION
AND INTEREST AND AND A DIVERSITY OF PERCEPTION
AND INTEREST AND THAT’S AND A DIVERSITY OF PERCEPTION
AND INTEREST AND THAT’S BUSINESS AND INTEREST AND THAT’S BUSINESS AND INTEREST AND THAT’S BUSINESS
AS AND INTEREST AND THAT’S BUSINESS
AS USUAL. AS USUAL. AS USUAL.
>>AS USUAL.
>>YOU’RE AS USUAL.
>>YOU’RE OKAY AS USUAL.
>>YOU’RE OKAY IF AS USUAL.
>>YOU’RE OKAY IF SENATOR>>YOU’RE OKAY IF SENATOR>>YOU’RE OKAY IF SENATOR
KYRSTEN>>YOU’RE OKAY IF SENATOR
KYRSTEN SINEMA>>YOU’RE OKAY IF SENATOR
KYRSTEN SINEMA RUNS>>YOU’RE OKAY IF SENATOR
KYRSTEN SINEMA RUNS AS>>YOU’RE OKAY IF SENATOR
KYRSTEN SINEMA RUNS AS AN KYRSTEN SINEMA RUNS AS AN KYRSTEN SINEMA RUNS AS AN
INDEPENDENT? INDEPENDENT? INDEPENDENT?
>>INDEPENDENT?
>>ANY INDEPENDENT?
>>ANY ENTREPRENEUR,>>ANY ENTREPRENEUR,>>ANY ENTREPRENEUR,
ANY>>ANY ENTREPRENEUR,
ANY BUSINESSMAN>>ANY ENTREPRENEUR,
ANY BUSINESSMAN WILL>>ANY ENTREPRENEUR,
ANY BUSINESSMAN WILL TELL>>ANY ENTREPRENEUR,
ANY BUSINESSMAN WILL TELL YOU ANY BUSINESSMAN WILL TELL YOU ANY BUSINESSMAN WILL TELL YOU
THERE’S ANY BUSINESSMAN WILL TELL YOU
THERE’S PROBLEMS ANY BUSINESSMAN WILL TELL YOU
THERE’S PROBLEMS TO ANY BUSINESSMAN WILL TELL YOU
THERE’S PROBLEMS TO BE ANY BUSINESSMAN WILL TELL YOU
THERE’S PROBLEMS TO BE SOLVED. THERE’S PROBLEMS TO BE SOLVED. THERE’S PROBLEMS TO BE SOLVED.
THEY THERE’S PROBLEMS TO BE SOLVED.
THEY WANT THERE’S PROBLEMS TO BE SOLVED.
THEY WANT IDEAS THERE’S PROBLEMS TO BE SOLVED.
THEY WANT IDEAS AROUND THERE’S PROBLEMS TO BE SOLVED.
THEY WANT IDEAS AROUND THE THERE’S PROBLEMS TO BE SOLVED.
THEY WANT IDEAS AROUND THE TABLE THEY WANT IDEAS AROUND THE TABLE THEY WANT IDEAS AROUND THE TABLE
TO THEY WANT IDEAS AROUND THE TABLE
TO COME THEY WANT IDEAS AROUND THE TABLE
TO COME UP THEY WANT IDEAS AROUND THE TABLE
TO COME UP WITH THEY WANT IDEAS AROUND THE TABLE
TO COME UP WITH THE THEY WANT IDEAS AROUND THE TABLE
TO COME UP WITH THE BEST TO COME UP WITH THE BEST TO COME UP WITH THE BEST
SOLUTION. SOLUTION. SOLUTION.
KYRSTEN SOLUTION.
KYRSTEN SINEMA SOLUTION.
KYRSTEN SINEMA APPROACHES KYRSTEN SINEMA APPROACHES KYRSTEN SINEMA APPROACHES
PROBLEMS KYRSTEN SINEMA APPROACHES
PROBLEMS AND KYRSTEN SINEMA APPROACHES
PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS KYRSTEN SINEMA APPROACHES
PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS THAT KYRSTEN SINEMA APPROACHES
PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS THAT WAY. PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS THAT WAY. PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS THAT WAY.
DEMOCRATIC PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS THAT WAY.
DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS THAT WAY.
DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES ARE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES ARE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES ARE
APPROACHING DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES ARE
APPROACHING PROBLEMS DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES ARE
APPROACHING PROBLEMS IN APPROACHING PROBLEMS IN APPROACHING PROBLEMS IN
SITUATIONS APPROACHING PROBLEMS IN
SITUATIONS THAT APPROACHING PROBLEMS IN
SITUATIONS THAT WAY. SITUATIONS THAT WAY. SITUATIONS THAT WAY.
>>SITUATIONS THAT WAY.
>>ALL SITUATIONS THAT WAY.
>>ALL DEMOCRATS?>>ALL DEMOCRATS?>>ALL DEMOCRATS?
IS>>ALL DEMOCRATS?
IS THIS>>ALL DEMOCRATS?
IS THIS THE>>ALL DEMOCRATS?
IS THIS THE WAY>>ALL DEMOCRATS?
IS THIS THE WAY TO>>ALL DEMOCRATS?
IS THIS THE WAY TO WIN>>ALL DEMOCRATS?
IS THIS THE WAY TO WIN NOW>>ALL DEMOCRATS?
IS THIS THE WAY TO WIN NOW FOR>>ALL DEMOCRATS?
IS THIS THE WAY TO WIN NOW FOR A IS THIS THE WAY TO WIN NOW FOR A IS THIS THE WAY TO WIN NOW FOR A
DEMOCRAT, IS THIS THE WAY TO WIN NOW FOR A
DEMOCRAT, TO IS THIS THE WAY TO WIN NOW FOR A
DEMOCRAT, TO BE IS THIS THE WAY TO WIN NOW FOR A
DEMOCRAT, TO BE INDEPENDENT IS THIS THE WAY TO WIN NOW FOR A
DEMOCRAT, TO BE INDEPENDENT AND DEMOCRAT, TO BE INDEPENDENT AND DEMOCRAT, TO BE INDEPENDENT AND
SEPARATE DEMOCRAT, TO BE INDEPENDENT AND
SEPARATE YOURSELF DEMOCRAT, TO BE INDEPENDENT AND
SEPARATE YOURSELF FROM DEMOCRAT, TO BE INDEPENDENT AND
SEPARATE YOURSELF FROM THE DEMOCRAT, TO BE INDEPENDENT AND
SEPARATE YOURSELF FROM THE PARTY SEPARATE YOURSELF FROM THE PARTY SEPARATE YOURSELF FROM THE PARTY
LABEL? LABEL? LABEL?
>>LABEL?
>>I LABEL?
>>I DON’T LABEL?
>>I DON’T AGREE LABEL?
>>I DON’T AGREE WITH LABEL?
>>I DON’T AGREE WITH YOU LABEL?
>>I DON’T AGREE WITH YOU THAT>>I DON’T AGREE WITH YOU THAT>>I DON’T AGREE WITH YOU THAT
THAT’S>>I DON’T AGREE WITH YOU THAT
THAT’S WHAT>>I DON’T AGREE WITH YOU THAT
THAT’S WHAT SHE’S>>I DON’T AGREE WITH YOU THAT
THAT’S WHAT SHE’S DOING. THAT’S WHAT SHE’S DOING. THAT’S WHAT SHE’S DOING.
ARIZONANS THAT’S WHAT SHE’S DOING.
ARIZONANS AS THAT’S WHAT SHE’S DOING.
ARIZONANS AS A THAT’S WHAT SHE’S DOING.
ARIZONANS AS A WHOLE THAT’S WHAT SHE’S DOING.
ARIZONANS AS A WHOLE ARE ARIZONANS AS A WHOLE ARE ARIZONANS AS A WHOLE ARE
INDEPENDENT. INDEPENDENT. INDEPENDENT.
AND INDEPENDENT.
AND THEY’RE INDEPENDENT.
AND THEY’RE VOTING INDEPENDENT.
AND THEY’RE VOTING FOR INDEPENDENT.
AND THEY’RE VOTING FOR THE AND THEY’RE VOTING FOR THE AND THEY’RE VOTING FOR THE
PERSON AND THEY’RE VOTING FOR THE
PERSON WHO’S AND THEY’RE VOTING FOR THE
PERSON WHO’S GOING AND THEY’RE VOTING FOR THE
PERSON WHO’S GOING TO AND THEY’RE VOTING FOR THE
PERSON WHO’S GOING TO MAKE AND THEY’RE VOTING FOR THE
PERSON WHO’S GOING TO MAKE SURE PERSON WHO’S GOING TO MAKE SURE PERSON WHO’S GOING TO MAKE SURE
THEY’RE PERSON WHO’S GOING TO MAKE SURE
THEY’RE PURSUING PERSON WHO’S GOING TO MAKE SURE
THEY’RE PURSUING VALUES PERSON WHO’S GOING TO MAKE SURE
THEY’RE PURSUING VALUES THAT PERSON WHO’S GOING TO MAKE SURE
THEY’RE PURSUING VALUES THAT ARE THEY’RE PURSUING VALUES THAT ARE THEY’RE PURSUING VALUES THAT ARE
IMPORTANT. IMPORTANT. IMPORTANT.
THE IMPORTANT.
THE VALUES IMPORTANT.
THE VALUES IMPORTANT IMPORTANT.
THE VALUES IMPORTANT TO IMPORTANT.
THE VALUES IMPORTANT TO ARIZONA THE VALUES IMPORTANT TO ARIZONA THE VALUES IMPORTANT TO ARIZONA
ARE THE VALUES IMPORTANT TO ARIZONA
ARE THE THE VALUES IMPORTANT TO ARIZONA
ARE THE VALUES THE VALUES IMPORTANT TO ARIZONA
ARE THE VALUES SHE’S THE VALUES IMPORTANT TO ARIZONA
ARE THE VALUES SHE’S SOUTHING ARE THE VALUES SHE’S SOUTHING ARE THE VALUES SHE’S SOUTHING
FOR. FOR. FOR.
I FOR.
I DON’T FOR.
I DON’T NEED FOR.
I DON’T NEED TO FOR.
I DON’T NEED TO DEFEND FOR.
I DON’T NEED TO DEFEND KYRSTEN I DON’T NEED TO DEFEND KYRSTEN I DON’T NEED TO DEFEND KYRSTEN
SINEMA I DON’T NEED TO DEFEND KYRSTEN
SINEMA BECAUSE I DON’T NEED TO DEFEND KYRSTEN
SINEMA BECAUSE SHE I DON’T NEED TO DEFEND KYRSTEN
SINEMA BECAUSE SHE CAN I DON’T NEED TO DEFEND KYRSTEN
SINEMA BECAUSE SHE CAN ANSWER I DON’T NEED TO DEFEND KYRSTEN
SINEMA BECAUSE SHE CAN ANSWER TO SINEMA BECAUSE SHE CAN ANSWER TO SINEMA BECAUSE SHE CAN ANSWER TO
THE SINEMA BECAUSE SHE CAN ANSWER TO
THE PROGRESSIVES. THE PROGRESSIVES. THE PROGRESSIVES.
THE THE PROGRESSIVES.
THE PROGRESSIVES THE PROGRESSIVES.
THE PROGRESSIVES ARE THE PROGRESSIVES.
THE PROGRESSIVES ARE AN THE PROGRESSIVES ARE AN THE PROGRESSIVES ARE AN
IMPORTANT THE PROGRESSIVES ARE AN
IMPORTANT PART THE PROGRESSIVES ARE AN
IMPORTANT PART OF THE PROGRESSIVES ARE AN
IMPORTANT PART OF THE THE PROGRESSIVES ARE AN
IMPORTANT PART OF THE PARTY. IMPORTANT PART OF THE PARTY. IMPORTANT PART OF THE PARTY.
>>IMPORTANT PART OF THE PARTY.
>>COULD IMPORTANT PART OF THE PARTY.
>>COULD THEY IMPORTANT PART OF THE PARTY.
>>COULD THEY BE IMPORTANT PART OF THE PARTY.
>>COULD THEY BE A IMPORTANT PART OF THE PARTY.
>>COULD THEY BE A PROBLEM IMPORTANT PART OF THE PARTY.
>>COULD THEY BE A PROBLEM FOR>>COULD THEY BE A PROBLEM FOR>>COULD THEY BE A PROBLEM FOR
THE>>COULD THEY BE A PROBLEM FOR
THE PARTY>>COULD THEY BE A PROBLEM FOR
THE PARTY IN>>COULD THEY BE A PROBLEM FOR
THE PARTY IN 2020>>COULD THEY BE A PROBLEM FOR
THE PARTY IN 2020 BY>>COULD THEY BE A PROBLEM FOR
THE PARTY IN 2020 BY DRIVING>>COULD THEY BE A PROBLEM FOR
THE PARTY IN 2020 BY DRIVING A THE PARTY IN 2020 BY DRIVING A THE PARTY IN 2020 BY DRIVING A
WEDGE? WEDGE? WEDGE?
>>WEDGE?
>>I WEDGE?
>>I GUARANTEE WEDGE?
>>I GUARANTEE YOU WEDGE?
>>I GUARANTEE YOU OUR WEDGE?
>>I GUARANTEE YOU OUR PARTY>>I GUARANTEE YOU OUR PARTY>>I GUARANTEE YOU OUR PARTY
WILL>>I GUARANTEE YOU OUR PARTY
WILL BE>>I GUARANTEE YOU OUR PARTY
WILL BE UNDIVIDED>>I GUARANTEE YOU OUR PARTY
WILL BE UNDIVIDED IN>>I GUARANTEE YOU OUR PARTY
WILL BE UNDIVIDED IN MAKING>>I GUARANTEE YOU OUR PARTY
WILL BE UNDIVIDED IN MAKING SURE WILL BE UNDIVIDED IN MAKING SURE WILL BE UNDIVIDED IN MAKING SURE
WE WILL BE UNDIVIDED IN MAKING SURE
WE ELECT WILL BE UNDIVIDED IN MAKING SURE
WE ELECT DEMOCRATS WILL BE UNDIVIDED IN MAKING SURE
WE ELECT DEMOCRATS UP WILL BE UNDIVIDED IN MAKING SURE
WE ELECT DEMOCRATS UP AND WILL BE UNDIVIDED IN MAKING SURE
WE ELECT DEMOCRATS UP AND DOWN WE ELECT DEMOCRATS UP AND DOWN WE ELECT DEMOCRATS UP AND DOWN
THE WE ELECT DEMOCRATS UP AND DOWN
THE VALLEY. THE VALLEY. THE VALLEY.
>>THE VALLEY.
>>I THE VALLEY.
>>I THINK THE VALLEY.
>>I THINK THE THE VALLEY.
>>I THINK THE PROGRESSIVES THE VALLEY.
>>I THINK THE PROGRESSIVES ARE>>I THINK THE PROGRESSIVES ARE>>I THINK THE PROGRESSIVES ARE
NOT>>I THINK THE PROGRESSIVES ARE
NOT JUST>>I THINK THE PROGRESSIVES ARE
NOT JUST A>>I THINK THE PROGRESSIVES ARE
NOT JUST A PROBLEM>>I THINK THE PROGRESSIVES ARE
NOT JUST A PROBLEM FOR>>I THINK THE PROGRESSIVES ARE
NOT JUST A PROBLEM FOR THE NOT JUST A PROBLEM FOR THE NOT JUST A PROBLEM FOR THE
DEMOCRATIC NOT JUST A PROBLEM FOR THE
DEMOCRATIC PARTY. DEMOCRATIC PARTY. DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
THEY’RE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
THEY’RE A DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
THEY’RE A PROBLEM DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
THEY’RE A PROBLEM FOR DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
THEY’RE A PROBLEM FOR THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
THEY’RE A PROBLEM FOR THE UNITED THEY’RE A PROBLEM FOR THE UNITED THEY’RE A PROBLEM FOR THE UNITED
STATES THEY’RE A PROBLEM FOR THE UNITED
STATES OF THEY’RE A PROBLEM FOR THE UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA. STATES OF AMERICA. STATES OF AMERICA.
THEY’RE STATES OF AMERICA.
THEY’RE EMBRACING STATES OF AMERICA.
THEY’RE EMBRACING SOCIALIST THEY’RE EMBRACING SOCIALIST THEY’RE EMBRACING SOCIALIST
POLICIES THEY’RE EMBRACING SOCIALIST
POLICIES AND THEY’RE EMBRACING SOCIALIST
POLICIES AND AS THEY’RE EMBRACING SOCIALIST
POLICIES AND AS YOU THEY’RE EMBRACING SOCIALIST
POLICIES AND AS YOU KNOW, POLICIES AND AS YOU KNOW, POLICIES AND AS YOU KNOW,
PRESIDENT POLICIES AND AS YOU KNOW,
PRESIDENT TRUMP POLICIES AND AS YOU KNOW,
PRESIDENT TRUMP SAID POLICIES AND AS YOU KNOW,
PRESIDENT TRUMP SAID THIS PRESIDENT TRUMP SAID THIS PRESIDENT TRUMP SAID THIS
COUNTRY PRESIDENT TRUMP SAID THIS
COUNTRY WILL PRESIDENT TRUMP SAID THIS
COUNTRY WILL NEVER PRESIDENT TRUMP SAID THIS
COUNTRY WILL NEVER BE PRESIDENT TRUMP SAID THIS
COUNTRY WILL NEVER BE A COUNTRY WILL NEVER BE A COUNTRY WILL NEVER BE A
SOCIALIST COUNTRY WILL NEVER BE A
SOCIALIST NATION. SOCIALIST NATION. SOCIALIST NATION.
I’M SOCIALIST NATION.
I’M WORKING SOCIALIST NATION.
I’M WORKING HARD. I’M WORKING HARD. I’M WORKING HARD.
REPUBLICANS I’M WORKING HARD.
REPUBLICANS ARE I’M WORKING HARD.
REPUBLICANS ARE WORKING I’M WORKING HARD.
REPUBLICANS ARE WORKING HARD I’M WORKING HARD.
REPUBLICANS ARE WORKING HARD TO REPUBLICANS ARE WORKING HARD TO REPUBLICANS ARE WORKING HARD TO
MAINTAIN REPUBLICANS ARE WORKING HARD TO
MAINTAIN FREEDOM. MAINTAIN FREEDOM. MAINTAIN FREEDOM.
FREEDOM MAINTAIN FREEDOM.
FREEDOM OF MAINTAIN FREEDOM.
FREEDOM OF SPEECH. FREEDOM OF SPEECH. FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
FREEDOM FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
FREEDOM TO FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
FREEDOM TO PROTECT FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
FREEDOM TO PROTECT YOURSELF. FREEDOM TO PROTECT YOURSELF. FREEDOM TO PROTECT YOURSELF.
FREEDOM FREEDOM TO PROTECT YOURSELF.
FREEDOM OF FREEDOM TO PROTECT YOURSELF.
FREEDOM OF RELIGION. FREEDOM OF RELIGION. FREEDOM OF RELIGION.
WE FREEDOM OF RELIGION.
WE DON’T FREEDOM OF RELIGION.
WE DON’T SEE FREEDOM OF RELIGION.
WE DON’T SEE THAT FREEDOM OF RELIGION.
WE DON’T SEE THAT FROM FREEDOM OF RELIGION.
WE DON’T SEE THAT FROM THE WE DON’T SEE THAT FROM THE WE DON’T SEE THAT FROM THE
PROGRESSIVES WE DON’T SEE THAT FROM THE
PROGRESSIVES ON WE DON’T SEE THAT FROM THE
PROGRESSIVES ON THE WE DON’T SEE THAT FROM THE
PROGRESSIVES ON THE DEMOCRAT PROGRESSIVES ON THE DEMOCRAT PROGRESSIVES ON THE DEMOCRAT
SIDE. SIDE. SIDE.
WE SIDE.
WE DON’T SIDE.
WE DON’T SEE SIDE.
WE DON’T SEE IT SIDE.
WE DON’T SEE IT FROM SIDE.
WE DON’T SEE IT FROM REALLY WE DON’T SEE IT FROM REALLY WE DON’T SEE IT FROM REALLY
ANYBODY WE DON’T SEE IT FROM REALLY
ANYBODY ON WE DON’T SEE IT FROM REALLY
ANYBODY ON THE WE DON’T SEE IT FROM REALLY
ANYBODY ON THE NATIONAL WE DON’T SEE IT FROM REALLY
ANYBODY ON THE NATIONAL STAGE WE DON’T SEE IT FROM REALLY
ANYBODY ON THE NATIONAL STAGE IN ANYBODY ON THE NATIONAL STAGE IN ANYBODY ON THE NATIONAL STAGE IN
THE ANYBODY ON THE NATIONAL STAGE IN
THE PRESIDENTIAL ANYBODY ON THE NATIONAL STAGE IN
THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
RUNNING THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
RUNNING TO THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
RUNNING TO BE THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
RUNNING TO BE THE THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
RUNNING TO BE THE DEMOCRAT RUNNING TO BE THE DEMOCRAT RUNNING TO BE THE DEMOCRAT
NOMINEE RUNNING TO BE THE DEMOCRAT
NOMINEE FOR RUNNING TO BE THE DEMOCRAT
NOMINEE FOR PRESIDENT. NOMINEE FOR PRESIDENT. NOMINEE FOR PRESIDENT.
>>NOMINEE FOR PRESIDENT.
>>I NOMINEE FOR PRESIDENT.
>>I WANT NOMINEE FOR PRESIDENT.
>>I WANT TO NOMINEE FOR PRESIDENT.
>>I WANT TO GO NOMINEE FOR PRESIDENT.
>>I WANT TO GO TO NOMINEE FOR PRESIDENT.
>>I WANT TO GO TO YOUR NOMINEE FOR PRESIDENT.
>>I WANT TO GO TO YOUR OWN>>I WANT TO GO TO YOUR OWN>>I WANT TO GO TO YOUR OWN
PARTY’S>>I WANT TO GO TO YOUR OWN
PARTY’S UNITY. PARTY’S UNITY. PARTY’S UNITY.
MARTHA PARTY’S UNITY.
MARTHA McSALLY PARTY’S UNITY.
MARTHA McSALLY SAID PARTY’S UNITY.
MARTHA McSALLY SAID YOU MARTHA McSALLY SAID YOU MARTHA McSALLY SAID YOU
SHOULDN’T MARTHA McSALLY SAID YOU
SHOULDN’T HAVE MARTHA McSALLY SAID YOU
SHOULDN’T HAVE USED MARTHA McSALLY SAID YOU
SHOULDN’T HAVE USED THE MARTHA McSALLY SAID YOU
SHOULDN’T HAVE USED THE PHRASE SHOULDN’T HAVE USED THE PHRASE SHOULDN’T HAVE USED THE PHRASE
DEAD SHOULDN’T HAVE USED THE PHRASE
DEAD IN SHOULDN’T HAVE USED THE PHRASE
DEAD IN THE SHOULDN’T HAVE USED THE PHRASE
DEAD IN THE WATER. DEAD IN THE WATER. DEAD IN THE WATER.
YOU DEAD IN THE WATER.
YOU WENT DEAD IN THE WATER.
YOU WENT ON DEAD IN THE WATER.
YOU WENT ON A DEAD IN THE WATER.
YOU WENT ON A DIFFERENT DEAD IN THE WATER.
YOU WENT ON A DIFFERENT RADIO YOU WENT ON A DIFFERENT RADIO YOU WENT ON A DIFFERENT RADIO
SHOW YOU WENT ON A DIFFERENT RADIO
SHOW AND YOU WENT ON A DIFFERENT RADIO
SHOW AND CRITICIZED YOU WENT ON A DIFFERENT RADIO
SHOW AND CRITICIZED McSALLY YOU WENT ON A DIFFERENT RADIO
SHOW AND CRITICIZED McSALLY FOR SHOW AND CRITICIZED McSALLY FOR SHOW AND CRITICIZED McSALLY FOR
TALKING SHOW AND CRITICIZED McSALLY FOR
TALKING TO, SHOW AND CRITICIZED McSALLY FOR
TALKING TO, QUOTE, SHOW AND CRITICIZED McSALLY FOR
TALKING TO, QUOTE, LIGHTWEIGHT TALKING TO, QUOTE, LIGHTWEIGHT TALKING TO, QUOTE, LIGHTWEIGHT
LOSERS. LOSERS. LOSERS.
IS LOSERS.
IS THAT LOSERS.
IS THAT HOW LOSERS.
IS THAT HOW A LOSERS.
IS THAT HOW A PARTY LOSERS.
IS THAT HOW A PARTY CHAIR LOSERS.
IS THAT HOW A PARTY CHAIR SHOULD IS THAT HOW A PARTY CHAIR SHOULD IS THAT HOW A PARTY CHAIR SHOULD
RESPOND IS THAT HOW A PARTY CHAIR SHOULD
RESPOND TO IS THAT HOW A PARTY CHAIR SHOULD
RESPOND TO SOMETHING IS THAT HOW A PARTY CHAIR SHOULD
RESPOND TO SOMETHING THAT IS THAT HOW A PARTY CHAIR SHOULD
RESPOND TO SOMETHING THAT HER RESPOND TO SOMETHING THAT HER RESPOND TO SOMETHING THAT HER
U.S. RESPOND TO SOMETHING THAT HER
U.S. SENATOR RESPOND TO SOMETHING THAT HER
U.S. SENATOR SAYS? U.S. SENATOR SAYS? U.S. SENATOR SAYS?
>>U.S. SENATOR SAYS?
>>BRAHM, U.S. SENATOR SAYS?
>>BRAHM, YOU’RE>>BRAHM, YOU’RE>>BRAHM, YOU’RE
MISCHARACTERIZING>>BRAHM, YOU’RE
MISCHARACTERIZING WHAT>>BRAHM, YOU’RE
MISCHARACTERIZING WHAT HAPPENED. MISCHARACTERIZING WHAT HAPPENED. MISCHARACTERIZING WHAT HAPPENED.
I MISCHARACTERIZING WHAT HAPPENED.
I WENT MISCHARACTERIZING WHAT HAPPENED.
I WENT ON MISCHARACTERIZING WHAT HAPPENED.
I WENT ON AND MISCHARACTERIZING WHAT HAPPENED.
I WENT ON AND SAID MISCHARACTERIZING WHAT HAPPENED.
I WENT ON AND SAID IF MISCHARACTERIZING WHAT HAPPENED.
I WENT ON AND SAID IF I MISCHARACTERIZING WHAT HAPPENED.
I WENT ON AND SAID IF I WERE MISCHARACTERIZING WHAT HAPPENED.
I WENT ON AND SAID IF I WERE A I WENT ON AND SAID IF I WERE A I WENT ON AND SAID IF I WERE A
REPUBLICAN, I WENT ON AND SAID IF I WERE A
REPUBLICAN, I I WENT ON AND SAID IF I WERE A
REPUBLICAN, I WOULDN’T I WENT ON AND SAID IF I WERE A
REPUBLICAN, I WOULDN’T GO I WENT ON AND SAID IF I WERE A
REPUBLICAN, I WOULDN’T GO ON I WENT ON AND SAID IF I WERE A
REPUBLICAN, I WOULDN’T GO ON A REPUBLICAN, I WOULDN’T GO ON A REPUBLICAN, I WOULDN’T GO ON A
RADIO REPUBLICAN, I WOULDN’T GO ON A
RADIO STATION REPUBLICAN, I WOULDN’T GO ON A
RADIO STATION THAT REPUBLICAN, I WOULDN’T GO ON A
RADIO STATION THAT HAD REPUBLICAN, I WOULDN’T GO ON A
RADIO STATION THAT HAD HOSTS RADIO STATION THAT HAD HOSTS RADIO STATION THAT HAD HOSTS
THAT RADIO STATION THAT HAD HOSTS
THAT WERE RADIO STATION THAT HAD HOSTS
THAT WERE LIGHTWEIGHT RADIO STATION THAT HAD HOSTS
THAT WERE LIGHTWEIGHT LOSERS RADIO STATION THAT HAD HOSTS
THAT WERE LIGHTWEIGHT LOSERS WHO THAT WERE LIGHTWEIGHT LOSERS WHO THAT WERE LIGHTWEIGHT LOSERS WHO
HAD THAT WERE LIGHTWEIGHT LOSERS WHO
HAD A THAT WERE LIGHTWEIGHT LOSERS WHO
HAD A MAJORITY, THAT WERE LIGHTWEIGHT LOSERS WHO
HAD A MAJORITY, VERY THAT WERE LIGHTWEIGHT LOSERS WHO
HAD A MAJORITY, VERY SMALL HAD A MAJORITY, VERY SMALL HAD A MAJORITY, VERY SMALL
AUDIENCE HAD A MAJORITY, VERY SMALL
AUDIENCE OF HAD A MAJORITY, VERY SMALL
AUDIENCE OF MAJORITY HAD A MAJORITY, VERY SMALL
AUDIENCE OF MAJORITY DEMOCRATS AUDIENCE OF MAJORITY DEMOCRATS AUDIENCE OF MAJORITY DEMOCRATS
WHO AUDIENCE OF MAJORITY DEMOCRATS
WHO SEEK AUDIENCE OF MAJORITY DEMOCRATS
WHO SEEK TO AUDIENCE OF MAJORITY DEMOCRATS
WHO SEEK TO PIT AUDIENCE OF MAJORITY DEMOCRATS
WHO SEEK TO PIT REPUBLICAN WHO SEEK TO PIT REPUBLICAN WHO SEEK TO PIT REPUBLICAN
AGAINST WHO SEEK TO PIT REPUBLICAN
AGAINST REPUBLICAN. AGAINST REPUBLICAN. AGAINST REPUBLICAN.
I AGAINST REPUBLICAN.
I STAND AGAINST REPUBLICAN.
I STAND FIRMLY AGAINST REPUBLICAN.
I STAND FIRMLY WITH AGAINST REPUBLICAN.
I STAND FIRMLY WITH REPUBLICANS. I STAND FIRMLY WITH REPUBLICANS. I STAND FIRMLY WITH REPUBLICANS.
AND I STAND FIRMLY WITH REPUBLICANS.
AND WE I STAND FIRMLY WITH REPUBLICANS.
AND WE NEED I STAND FIRMLY WITH REPUBLICANS.
AND WE NEED TO I STAND FIRMLY WITH REPUBLICANS.
AND WE NEED TO TURN I STAND FIRMLY WITH REPUBLICANS.
AND WE NEED TO TURN THINGS I STAND FIRMLY WITH REPUBLICANS.
AND WE NEED TO TURN THINGS BACK AND WE NEED TO TURN THINGS BACK AND WE NEED TO TURN THINGS BACK
AROUND AND WE NEED TO TURN THINGS BACK
AROUND TO AND WE NEED TO TURN THINGS BACK
AROUND TO THE AND WE NEED TO TURN THINGS BACK
AROUND TO THE TRUE AND WE NEED TO TURN THINGS BACK
AROUND TO THE TRUE POLITICAL AROUND TO THE TRUE POLITICAL AROUND TO THE TRUE POLITICAL
ADVERSARY, AROUND TO THE TRUE POLITICAL
ADVERSARY, THE AROUND TO THE TRUE POLITICAL
ADVERSARY, THE DEMOCRATS. ADVERSARY, THE DEMOCRATS. ADVERSARY, THE DEMOCRATS.
>>ADVERSARY, THE DEMOCRATS.
>>WASN’T ADVERSARY, THE DEMOCRATS.
>>WASN’T THERE ADVERSARY, THE DEMOCRATS.
>>WASN’T THERE A ADVERSARY, THE DEMOCRATS.
>>WASN’T THERE A BETTER ADVERSARY, THE DEMOCRATS.
>>WASN’T THERE A BETTER WAY ADVERSARY, THE DEMOCRATS.
>>WASN’T THERE A BETTER WAY TO>>WASN’T THERE A BETTER WAY TO>>WASN’T THERE A BETTER WAY TO
HANDLE>>WASN’T THERE A BETTER WAY TO
HANDLE THAT>>WASN’T THERE A BETTER WAY TO
HANDLE THAT SITUATION? HANDLE THAT SITUATION? HANDLE THAT SITUATION?
>>HANDLE THAT SITUATION?
>>YES, HANDLE THAT SITUATION?
>>YES, MARK HANDLE THAT SITUATION?
>>YES, MARK KELLY HANDLE THAT SITUATION?
>>YES, MARK KELLY IS HANDLE THAT SITUATION?
>>YES, MARK KELLY IS A HANDLE THAT SITUATION?
>>YES, MARK KELLY IS A GUN>>YES, MARK KELLY IS A GUN>>YES, MARK KELLY IS A GUN
GRABBER. GRABBER. GRABBER.
MARK GRABBER.
MARK KELLY GRABBER.
MARK KELLY WANTS GRABBER.
MARK KELLY WANTS TO GRABBER.
MARK KELLY WANTS TO TAKE GRABBER.
MARK KELLY WANTS TO TAKE AWAY MARK KELLY WANTS TO TAKE AWAY MARK KELLY WANTS TO TAKE AWAY
ARIZONANS’ MARK KELLY WANTS TO TAKE AWAY
ARIZONANS’ SECOND MARK KELLY WANTS TO TAKE AWAY
ARIZONANS’ SECOND AMENDMENT ARIZONANS’ SECOND AMENDMENT ARIZONANS’ SECOND AMENDMENT
RIGHTS. RIGHTS. RIGHTS.
>>RIGHTS.
>>THAT’S RIGHTS.
>>THAT’S A RIGHTS.
>>THAT’S A FINE RIGHTS.
>>THAT’S A FINE PIVOT.>>THAT’S A FINE PIVOT.>>THAT’S A FINE PIVOT.
I>>THAT’S A FINE PIVOT.
I WANT>>THAT’S A FINE PIVOT.
I WANT TO>>THAT’S A FINE PIVOT.
I WANT TO GET>>THAT’S A FINE PIVOT.
I WANT TO GET BACK>>THAT’S A FINE PIVOT.
I WANT TO GET BACK TO>>THAT’S A FINE PIVOT.
I WANT TO GET BACK TO THE I WANT TO GET BACK TO THE I WANT TO GET BACK TO THE
QUESTION. QUESTION. QUESTION.
WASN’T QUESTION.
WASN’T THERE QUESTION.
WASN’T THERE A QUESTION.
WASN’T THERE A BETTER QUESTION.
WASN’T THERE A BETTER WAY QUESTION.
WASN’T THERE A BETTER WAY TO WASN’T THERE A BETTER WAY TO WASN’T THERE A BETTER WAY TO
HANDLE WASN’T THERE A BETTER WAY TO
HANDLE THAT WASN’T THERE A BETTER WAY TO
HANDLE THAT WITH WASN’T THERE A BETTER WAY TO
HANDLE THAT WITH YOUR WASN’T THERE A BETTER WAY TO
HANDLE THAT WITH YOUR OWN WASN’T THERE A BETTER WAY TO
HANDLE THAT WITH YOUR OWN PARTY HANDLE THAT WITH YOUR OWN PARTY HANDLE THAT WITH YOUR OWN PARTY
SENATOR? SENATOR? SENATOR?
>>SENATOR?
>>I SENATOR?
>>I HANDLED SENATOR?
>>I HANDLED IT SENATOR?
>>I HANDLED IT PERFECTLY SENATOR?
>>I HANDLED IT PERFECTLY WITH>>I HANDLED IT PERFECTLY WITH>>I HANDLED IT PERFECTLY WITH
THE>>I HANDLED IT PERFECTLY WITH
THE SENATOR>>I HANDLED IT PERFECTLY WITH
THE SENATOR AND>>I HANDLED IT PERFECTLY WITH
THE SENATOR AND GOVERNOR>>I HANDLED IT PERFECTLY WITH
THE SENATOR AND GOVERNOR DUCEY THE SENATOR AND GOVERNOR DUCEY THE SENATOR AND GOVERNOR DUCEY
WAS THE SENATOR AND GOVERNOR DUCEY
WAS ON THE SENATOR AND GOVERNOR DUCEY
WAS ON THE THE SENATOR AND GOVERNOR DUCEY
WAS ON THE VERY THE SENATOR AND GOVERNOR DUCEY
WAS ON THE VERY SHOW THE SENATOR AND GOVERNOR DUCEY
WAS ON THE VERY SHOW THIS THE SENATOR AND GOVERNOR DUCEY
WAS ON THE VERY SHOW THIS WEEK WAS ON THE VERY SHOW THIS WEEK WAS ON THE VERY SHOW THIS WEEK
AND WAS ON THE VERY SHOW THIS WEEK
AND HE WAS ON THE VERY SHOW THIS WEEK
AND HE HANDLED WAS ON THE VERY SHOW THIS WEEK
AND HE HANDLED IT WAS ON THE VERY SHOW THIS WEEK
AND HE HANDLED IT MASTERFULLY. AND HE HANDLED IT MASTERFULLY. AND HE HANDLED IT MASTERFULLY.
WHICH AND HE HANDLED IT MASTERFULLY.
WHICH MEANS AND HE HANDLED IT MASTERFULLY.
WHICH MEANS EXPOSING AND HE HANDLED IT MASTERFULLY.
WHICH MEANS EXPOSING THE WHICH MEANS EXPOSING THE WHICH MEANS EXPOSING THE
DEMOCRATS WHICH MEANS EXPOSING THE
DEMOCRATS AND WHICH MEANS EXPOSING THE
DEMOCRATS AND THE WHICH MEANS EXPOSING THE
DEMOCRATS AND THE FAKE WHICH MEANS EXPOSING THE
DEMOCRATS AND THE FAKE NEWS WHICH MEANS EXPOSING THE
DEMOCRATS AND THE FAKE NEWS FOR DEMOCRATS AND THE FAKE NEWS FOR DEMOCRATS AND THE FAKE NEWS FOR
WHAT DEMOCRATS AND THE FAKE NEWS FOR
WHAT THEY DEMOCRATS AND THE FAKE NEWS FOR
WHAT THEY ARE DEMOCRATS AND THE FAKE NEWS FOR
WHAT THEY ARE AND DEMOCRATS AND THE FAKE NEWS FOR
WHAT THEY ARE AND WHAT DEMOCRATS AND THE FAKE NEWS FOR
WHAT THEY ARE AND WHAT THEY WHAT THEY ARE AND WHAT THEY WHAT THEY ARE AND WHAT THEY
TRIED WHAT THEY ARE AND WHAT THEY
TRIED TO WHAT THEY ARE AND WHAT THEY
TRIED TO DO WHAT THEY ARE AND WHAT THEY
TRIED TO DO WHICH WHAT THEY ARE AND WHAT THEY
TRIED TO DO WHICH IS WHAT THEY ARE AND WHAT THEY
TRIED TO DO WHICH IS DRIVE WHAT THEY ARE AND WHAT THEY
TRIED TO DO WHICH IS DRIVE A TRIED TO DO WHICH IS DRIVE A TRIED TO DO WHICH IS DRIVE A
WEDGE TRIED TO DO WHICH IS DRIVE A
WEDGE BETWEEN TRIED TO DO WHICH IS DRIVE A
WEDGE BETWEEN REPUBLICANS. WEDGE BETWEEN REPUBLICANS. WEDGE BETWEEN REPUBLICANS.
THIS WEDGE BETWEEN REPUBLICANS.
THIS REPUBLICAN WEDGE BETWEEN REPUBLICANS.
THIS REPUBLICAN PARTY WEDGE BETWEEN REPUBLICANS.
THIS REPUBLICAN PARTY IS WEDGE BETWEEN REPUBLICANS.
THIS REPUBLICAN PARTY IS MORE THIS REPUBLICAN PARTY IS MORE THIS REPUBLICAN PARTY IS MORE
UNITED THIS REPUBLICAN PARTY IS MORE
UNITED THAN THIS REPUBLICAN PARTY IS MORE
UNITED THAN EVER. UNITED THAN EVER. UNITED THAN EVER.
EVERYONE UNITED THAN EVER.
EVERYONE IS UNITED THAN EVER.
EVERYONE IS WELCOME UNITED THAN EVER.
EVERYONE IS WELCOME INTO UNITED THAN EVER.
EVERYONE IS WELCOME INTO OUR EVERYONE IS WELCOME INTO OUR EVERYONE IS WELCOME INTO OUR
PARTY. PARTY. PARTY.
WE PARTY.
WE VALUE PARTY.
WE VALUE LIFE. WE VALUE LIFE. WE VALUE LIFE.
WE WE VALUE LIFE.
WE VALUE WE VALUE LIFE.
WE VALUE RELIGION. WE VALUE RELIGION. WE VALUE RELIGION.
WE WE VALUE RELIGION.
WE VALUE WE VALUE RELIGION.
WE VALUE DIVERSITY. WE VALUE DIVERSITY. WE VALUE DIVERSITY.
THAT’S WE VALUE DIVERSITY.
THAT’S WHY WE VALUE DIVERSITY.
THAT’S WHY SO WE VALUE DIVERSITY.
THAT’S WHY SO MANY WE VALUE DIVERSITY.
THAT’S WHY SO MANY PEOPLE WE VALUE DIVERSITY.
THAT’S WHY SO MANY PEOPLE ARE THAT’S WHY SO MANY PEOPLE ARE THAT’S WHY SO MANY PEOPLE ARE
NOT THAT’S WHY SO MANY PEOPLE ARE
NOT JUST THAT’S WHY SO MANY PEOPLE ARE
NOT JUST WALKING THAT’S WHY SO MANY PEOPLE ARE
NOT JUST WALKING AWAY THAT’S WHY SO MANY PEOPLE ARE
NOT JUST WALKING AWAY FROM THAT’S WHY SO MANY PEOPLE ARE
NOT JUST WALKING AWAY FROM THE NOT JUST WALKING AWAY FROM THE NOT JUST WALKING AWAY FROM THE
DEMOCRAT NOT JUST WALKING AWAY FROM THE
DEMOCRAT PARTY NOT JUST WALKING AWAY FROM THE
DEMOCRAT PARTY BUT NOT JUST WALKING AWAY FROM THE
DEMOCRAT PARTY BUT RUNNING NOT JUST WALKING AWAY FROM THE
DEMOCRAT PARTY BUT RUNNING AWAY. DEMOCRAT PARTY BUT RUNNING AWAY. DEMOCRAT PARTY BUT RUNNING AWAY.
>>DEMOCRAT PARTY BUT RUNNING AWAY.
>>I DEMOCRAT PARTY BUT RUNNING AWAY.
>>I DON’T DEMOCRAT PARTY BUT RUNNING AWAY.
>>I DON’T THINK DEMOCRAT PARTY BUT RUNNING AWAY.
>>I DON’T THINK THERE’S DEMOCRAT PARTY BUT RUNNING AWAY.
>>I DON’T THINK THERE’S ANY>>I DON’T THINK THERE’S ANY>>I DON’T THINK THERE’S ANY
EVIDENCE. EVIDENCE. EVIDENCE.
>>EVIDENCE.
>>MAY EVIDENCE.
>>MAY I EVIDENCE.
>>MAY I HAVE EVIDENCE.
>>MAY I HAVE A EVIDENCE.
>>MAY I HAVE A CHANCE EVIDENCE.
>>MAY I HAVE A CHANCE TO>>MAY I HAVE A CHANCE TO>>MAY I HAVE A CHANCE TO
RESPOND>>MAY I HAVE A CHANCE TO
RESPOND TO>>MAY I HAVE A CHANCE TO
RESPOND TO THAT? RESPOND TO THAT? RESPOND TO THAT?
FIRST RESPOND TO THAT?
FIRST OFF, RESPOND TO THAT?
FIRST OFF, THE RESPOND TO THAT?
FIRST OFF, THE PHRASEOLOGY RESPOND TO THAT?
FIRST OFF, THE PHRASEOLOGY WAS FIRST OFF, THE PHRASEOLOGY WAS FIRST OFF, THE PHRASEOLOGY WAS
WRONG. WRONG. WRONG.
I WRONG.
I WAS WRONG.
I WAS RAISED WRONG.
I WAS RAISED THAT WRONG.
I WAS RAISED THAT LEADERS WRONG.
I WAS RAISED THAT LEADERS AND I WAS RAISED THAT LEADERS AND I WAS RAISED THAT LEADERS AND
LEADERS I WAS RAISED THAT LEADERS AND
LEADERS OF I WAS RAISED THAT LEADERS AND
LEADERS OF PARTIES, I WAS RAISED THAT LEADERS AND
LEADERS OF PARTIES, ELECTED LEADERS OF PARTIES, ELECTED LEADERS OF PARTIES, ELECTED
OFFICIALS LEADERS OF PARTIES, ELECTED
OFFICIALS SHOULD LEADERS OF PARTIES, ELECTED
OFFICIALS SHOULD BE LEADERS OF PARTIES, ELECTED
OFFICIALS SHOULD BE EXAMPLES LEADERS OF PARTIES, ELECTED
OFFICIALS SHOULD BE EXAMPLES OF OFFICIALS SHOULD BE EXAMPLES OF OFFICIALS SHOULD BE EXAMPLES OF
HOW OFFICIALS SHOULD BE EXAMPLES OF
HOW TO OFFICIALS SHOULD BE EXAMPLES OF
HOW TO ACT, OFFICIALS SHOULD BE EXAMPLES OF
HOW TO ACT, HOW OFFICIALS SHOULD BE EXAMPLES OF
HOW TO ACT, HOW TO OFFICIALS SHOULD BE EXAMPLES OF
HOW TO ACT, HOW TO BE OFFICIALS SHOULD BE EXAMPLES OF
HOW TO ACT, HOW TO BE RESPECTFUL HOW TO ACT, HOW TO BE RESPECTFUL HOW TO ACT, HOW TO BE RESPECTFUL
TO HOW TO ACT, HOW TO BE RESPECTFUL
TO ONE HOW TO ACT, HOW TO BE RESPECTFUL
TO ONE ANOTHER. TO ONE ANOTHER. TO ONE ANOTHER.
LET’S TO ONE ANOTHER.
LET’S MAKE TO ONE ANOTHER.
LET’S MAKE INTEGRITY TO ONE ANOTHER.
LET’S MAKE INTEGRITY GREAT LET’S MAKE INTEGRITY GREAT LET’S MAKE INTEGRITY GREAT
AGAIN. AGAIN. AGAIN.
THE AGAIN.
THE PHRASEOLOGY AGAIN.
THE PHRASEOLOGY WAS AGAIN.
THE PHRASEOLOGY WAS NOT AGAIN.
THE PHRASEOLOGY WAS NOT ONLY THE PHRASEOLOGY WAS NOT ONLY THE PHRASEOLOGY WAS NOT ONLY
WRONG THE PHRASEOLOGY WAS NOT ONLY
WRONG BUT THE PHRASEOLOGY WAS NOT ONLY
WRONG BUT I THE PHRASEOLOGY WAS NOT ONLY
WRONG BUT I THINK THE PHRASEOLOGY WAS NOT ONLY
WRONG BUT I THINK GOVERNOR WRONG BUT I THINK GOVERNOR WRONG BUT I THINK GOVERNOR
BREWER WRONG BUT I THINK GOVERNOR
BREWER SAID WRONG BUT I THINK GOVERNOR
BREWER SAID IT WRONG BUT I THINK GOVERNOR
BREWER SAID IT BEST WRONG BUT I THINK GOVERNOR
BREWER SAID IT BEST WHEN WRONG BUT I THINK GOVERNOR
BREWER SAID IT BEST WHEN SHE BREWER SAID IT BEST WHEN SHE BREWER SAID IT BEST WHEN SHE
TOLD BREWER SAID IT BEST WHEN SHE
TOLD DR. BREWER SAID IT BEST WHEN SHE
TOLD DR. WARD BREWER SAID IT BEST WHEN SHE
TOLD DR. WARD TO BREWER SAID IT BEST WHEN SHE
TOLD DR. WARD TO CLEAN BREWER SAID IT BEST WHEN SHE
TOLD DR. WARD TO CLEAN IT BREWER SAID IT BEST WHEN SHE
TOLD DR. WARD TO CLEAN IT UP. TOLD DR. WARD TO CLEAN IT UP. TOLD DR. WARD TO CLEAN IT UP.
THE TOLD DR. WARD TO CLEAN IT UP.
THE RHETORIC TOLD DR. WARD TO CLEAN IT UP.
THE RHETORIC WE TOLD DR. WARD TO CLEAN IT UP.
THE RHETORIC WE JUST TOLD DR. WARD TO CLEAN IT UP.
THE RHETORIC WE JUST HEARD TOLD DR. WARD TO CLEAN IT UP.
THE RHETORIC WE JUST HEARD FROM THE RHETORIC WE JUST HEARD FROM THE RHETORIC WE JUST HEARD FROM
DR. THE RHETORIC WE JUST HEARD FROM
DR. WARD THE RHETORIC WE JUST HEARD FROM
DR. WARD IS THE RHETORIC WE JUST HEARD FROM
DR. WARD IS EXACTLY THE RHETORIC WE JUST HEARD FROM
DR. WARD IS EXACTLY THE THE RHETORIC WE JUST HEARD FROM
DR. WARD IS EXACTLY THE KIND THE RHETORIC WE JUST HEARD FROM
DR. WARD IS EXACTLY THE KIND OF DR. WARD IS EXACTLY THE KIND OF DR. WARD IS EXACTLY THE KIND OF
DIVISIVE DR. WARD IS EXACTLY THE KIND OF
DIVISIVE DANGEROUS DR. WARD IS EXACTLY THE KIND OF
DIVISIVE DANGEROUS LANGUAGE DR. WARD IS EXACTLY THE KIND OF
DIVISIVE DANGEROUS LANGUAGE THAT DIVISIVE DANGEROUS LANGUAGE THAT DIVISIVE DANGEROUS LANGUAGE THAT
NO DIVISIVE DANGEROUS LANGUAGE THAT
NO ONE DIVISIVE DANGEROUS LANGUAGE THAT
NO ONE LIKES. NO ONE LIKES. NO ONE LIKES.
>>NO ONE LIKES.
>>BUT NO ONE LIKES.
>>BUT BRAHM NO ONE LIKES.
>>BUT BRAHM –>>BUT BRAHM –>>BUT BRAHM —
>>>>BUT BRAHM —
>>THEIR>>BUT BRAHM —
>>THEIR NOMINEE>>BUT BRAHM —
>>THEIR NOMINEE HAS>>BUT BRAHM —
>>THEIR NOMINEE HAS USED>>BUT BRAHM —
>>THEIR NOMINEE HAS USED THAT>>THEIR NOMINEE HAS USED THAT>>THEIR NOMINEE HAS USED THAT
EXACT>>THEIR NOMINEE HAS USED THAT
EXACT SAME>>THEIR NOMINEE HAS USED THAT
EXACT SAME PHRASE. EXACT SAME PHRASE. EXACT SAME PHRASE.
>>EXACT SAME PHRASE.
>>NEXT EXACT SAME PHRASE.
>>NEXT SEGMENT EXACT SAME PHRASE.
>>NEXT SEGMENT WE EXACT SAME PHRASE.
>>NEXT SEGMENT WE CAN EXACT SAME PHRASE.
>>NEXT SEGMENT WE CAN KEEP>>NEXT SEGMENT WE CAN KEEP>>NEXT SEGMENT WE CAN KEEP
THIS>>NEXT SEGMENT WE CAN KEEP
THIS GOING. THIS GOING. THIS GOING.
WHEN THIS GOING.
WHEN WE THIS GOING.
WHEN WE COME THIS GOING.
WHEN WE COME BACK, THIS GOING.
WHEN WE COME BACK, WHAT THIS GOING.
WHEN WE COME BACK, WHAT DO THIS GOING.
WHEN WE COME BACK, WHAT DO THE WHEN WE COME BACK, WHAT DO THE WHEN WE COME BACK, WHAT DO THE
PARTIES WHEN WE COME BACK, WHAT DO THE
PARTIES HAVE WHEN WE COME BACK, WHAT DO THE
PARTIES HAVE AGAINST WHEN WE COME BACK, WHAT DO THE
PARTIES HAVE AGAINST LETTING PARTIES HAVE AGAINST LETTING PARTIES HAVE AGAINST LETTING
MORE PARTIES HAVE AGAINST LETTING
MORE PEOPLE PARTIES HAVE AGAINST LETTING
MORE PEOPLE VOTE? MORE PEOPLE VOTE? MORE PEOPLE VOTE?
STAY MORE PEOPLE VOTE?
STAY WITH

1 thought on “AZ Dem chair brushes off bid to censure Sinema

  1. Definitely don't apologize for the Republican Party. The left is constantly belittling the Right and they NEVER apologize. They think they are ALWAYS correct. Not so !

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *