Audit says St. Louis County Pet Adoption Center fudged euthanasia numbers


FOR FOR YEARS, FOR YEARS, ANIMAL FOR YEARS, ANIMAL WELFARE FOR YEARS, ANIMAL WELFARE
ADVOCATES FOR YEARS, ANIMAL WELFARE
ADVOCATES HAVE FOR YEARS, ANIMAL WELFARE
ADVOCATES HAVE CRITICIZED FOR YEARS, ANIMAL WELFARE
ADVOCATES HAVE CRITICIZED THE FOR YEARS, ANIMAL WELFARE
ADVOCATES HAVE CRITICIZED THE
ST. FOR YEARS, ANIMAL WELFARE
ADVOCATES HAVE CRITICIZED THE
ST. LOUIS FOR YEARS, ANIMAL WELFARE
ADVOCATES HAVE CRITICIZED THE
ST. LOUIS COUNTY FOR YEARS, ANIMAL WELFARE
ADVOCATES HAVE CRITICIZED THE
ST. LOUIS COUNTY [email protected] ADVOCATES HAVE CRITICIZED THE
ST. LOUIS COUNTY [email protected] ADVOCATES HAVE CRITICIZED THE
ST. LOUIS COUNTY [email protected]
SHELTER ADVOCATES HAVE CRITICIZED THE
ST. LOUIS COUNTY [email protected]
SHELTER FOR ADVOCATES HAVE CRITICIZED THE
ST. LOUIS COUNTY [email protected]
SHELTER FOR EUTHANIZING ADVOCATES HAVE CRITICIZED THE
ST. LOUIS COUNTY [email protected]
SHELTER FOR EUTHANIZING TOO ST. LOUIS COUNTY [email protected]
SHELTER FOR EUTHANIZING TOO ST. LOUIS COUNTY [email protected]
SHELTER FOR EUTHANIZING TOO
MANY ST. LOUIS COUNTY [email protected]
SHELTER FOR EUTHANIZING TOO
MANY OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY [email protected]
SHELTER FOR EUTHANIZING TOO
MANY OF THE ST. LOUIS COUNTY [email protected]
SHELTER FOR EUTHANIZING TOO
MANY OF THE PETS ST. LOUIS COUNTY [email protected]
SHELTER FOR EUTHANIZING TOO
MANY OF THE PETS LEFT ST. LOUIS COUNTY [email protected]
SHELTER FOR EUTHANIZING TOO
MANY OF THE PETS LEFT FOR SHELTER FOR EUTHANIZING TOO
MANY OF THE PETS LEFT FOR SHELTER FOR EUTHANIZING TOO
MANY OF THE PETS LEFT FOR
ADOPTION.>>>>>>FOR>>>FOR YEARS>>>FOR YEARS ANIMAL>>>FOR YEARS ANIMAL WELFARE>>>FOR YEARS ANIMAL WELFARE
ADVOCATES>>>FOR YEARS ANIMAL WELFARE
ADVOCATES HAVE>>>FOR YEARS ANIMAL WELFARE
ADVOCATES HAVE CRITICIZED>>>FOR YEARS ANIMAL WELFARE
ADVOCATES HAVE CRITICIZED THE ADVOCATES HAVE CRITICIZED THE ADVOCATES HAVE CRITICIZED THE
ST. ADVOCATES HAVE CRITICIZED THE
ST. LOUIS ADVOCATES HAVE CRITICIZED THE
ST. LOUIS COUNTY ADVOCATES HAVE CRITICIZED THE
ST. LOUIS COUNTY [email protected] ADVOCATES HAVE CRITICIZED THE
ST. LOUIS COUNTY [email protected] SHELT ST. LOUIS COUNTY [email protected] SHELT ST. LOUIS COUNTY [email protected] SHELT
FOR ST. LOUIS COUNTY [email protected] SHELT
FOR EUTHANIZING ST. LOUIS COUNTY [email protected] SHELT
FOR EUTHANIZING TOO ST. LOUIS COUNTY [email protected] SHELT
FOR EUTHANIZING TOO MANY ST. LOUIS COUNTY [email protected] SHELT
FOR EUTHANIZING TOO MANY OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY [email protected] SHELT
FOR EUTHANIZING TOO MANY OF THE FOR EUTHANIZING TOO MANY OF THE FOR EUTHANIZING TOO MANY OF THE
PETS FOR EUTHANIZING TOO MANY OF THE
PETS LEFT FOR EUTHANIZING TOO MANY OF THE
PETS LEFT FOR FOR EUTHANIZING TOO MANY OF THE
PETS LEFT FOR ADOPTION.>>FOR EUTHANIZING TOO MANY OF THE
PETS LEFT FOR ADOPTION.>>[email protected] PETS LEFT FOR ADOPTION.>>[email protected] PETS LEFT FOR ADOPTION.>>[email protected]
YEAR PETS LEFT FOR ADOPTION.>>[email protected]
YEAR THE PETS LEFT FOR ADOPTION.>>[email protected]
YEAR THE COUNTY PETS LEFT FOR ADOPTION.>>[email protected]
YEAR THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE YEAR THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE YEAR THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE
BRAGGED YEAR THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE
BRAGGED THAT YEAR THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE
BRAGGED THAT UNDER YEAR THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE
BRAGGED THAT UNDER HIS YEAR THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE
BRAGGED THAT UNDER HIS CONTROL BRAGGED THAT UNDER HIS CONTROL BRAGGED THAT UNDER HIS CONTROL
THOSE BRAGGED THAT UNDER HIS CONTROL
THOSE NUMBERS BRAGGED THAT UNDER HIS CONTROL
THOSE NUMBERS WERE BRAGGED THAT UNDER HIS CONTROL
THOSE NUMBERS WERE [email protected]@DOWN BRAGGED THAT UNDER HIS CONTROL
THOSE NUMBERS WERE [email protected]@DOWN BUT THOSE NUMBERS WERE [email protected]@DOWN BUT THOSE NUMBERS WERE [email protected]@DOWN BUT
A THOSE NUMBERS WERE [email protected]@DOWN BUT
A NEW THOSE NUMBERS WERE [email protected]@DOWN BUT
A NEW AUDIT THOSE NUMBERS WERE [email protected]@DOWN BUT
A NEW AUDIT SAYS THOSE NUMBERS WERE [email protected]@DOWN BUT
A NEW AUDIT SAYS THE THOSE NUMBERS WERE [email protected]@DOWN BUT
A NEW AUDIT SAYS THE OPPOSITE A NEW AUDIT SAYS THE OPPOSITE A NEW AUDIT SAYS THE OPPOSITE
MIGHT A NEW AUDIT SAYS THE OPPOSITE
MIGHT BE A NEW AUDIT SAYS THE OPPOSITE
MIGHT BE TRUE A NEW AUDIT SAYS THE OPPOSITE
MIGHT BE TRUE AND A NEW AUDIT SAYS THE OPPOSITE
MIGHT BE TRUE AND PET A NEW AUDIT SAYS THE OPPOSITE
MIGHT BE TRUE AND PET OWNERS MIGHT BE TRUE AND PET OWNERS MIGHT BE TRUE AND PET OWNERS
MIGHT MIGHT BE TRUE AND PET OWNERS
MIGHT HAVE MIGHT BE TRUE AND PET OWNERS
MIGHT HAVE UNKNOWINGLY MIGHT HAVE UNKNOWINGLY MIGHT HAVE UNKNOWINGLY
REQUESTED MIGHT HAVE UNKNOWINGLY
REQUESTED THEIR MIGHT HAVE UNKNOWINGLY
REQUESTED THEIR ANIMALS MIGHT HAVE UNKNOWINGLY
REQUESTED THEIR ANIMALS TO MIGHT HAVE UNKNOWINGLY
REQUESTED THEIR ANIMALS TO BE REQUESTED THEIR ANIMALS TO BE REQUESTED THEIR ANIMALS TO BE
PUT REQUESTED THEIR ANIMALS TO BE
PUT DOWN.>>REQUESTED THEIR ANIMALS TO BE
PUT DOWN.>>I REQUESTED THEIR ANIMALS TO BE
PUT DOWN.>>I KNOW REQUESTED THEIR ANIMALS TO BE
PUT DOWN.>>I KNOW THAT REQUESTED THEIR ANIMALS TO BE
PUT DOWN.>>I KNOW THAT WE REQUESTED THEIR ANIMALS TO BE
PUT DOWN.>>I KNOW THAT WE HAVE REQUESTED THEIR ANIMALS TO BE
PUT DOWN.>>I KNOW THAT WE [email protected] PUT DOWN.>>I KNOW THAT WE [email protected] PUT DOWN.>>I KNOW THAT WE [email protected]
A PUT DOWN.>>I KNOW THAT WE [email protected]
A SENSE.>>PUT DOWN.>>I KNOW THAT WE [email protected]
A SENSE.>>Reporter: PUT DOWN.>>I KNOW THAT WE [email protected]
A SENSE.>>Reporter: THE PUT DOWN.>>I KNOW THAT WE [email protected]
A SENSE.>>Reporter: THE ACTING A SENSE.>>Reporter: THE ACTING A SENSE.>>Reporter: THE ACTING
DIRECTOR A SENSE.>>Reporter: THE ACTING
DIRECTOR OF A SENSE.>>Reporter: THE ACTING
DIRECTOR OF THE A SENSE.>>Reporter: THE ACTING
DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT A SENSE.>>Reporter: THE ACTING
DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC HEALTH DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC HEALTH DESCRIBES DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC HEALTH DESCRIBES [email protected] PUBLIC HEALTH DESCRIBES [email protected] PUBLIC HEALTH DESCRIBES [email protected]
COUNTIES PUBLIC HEALTH DESCRIBES [email protected]
COUNTIES ONLY PUBLIC HEALTH DESCRIBES [email protected]
COUNTIES ONLY ANIMAL PUBLIC HEALTH DESCRIBES [email protected]
COUNTIES ONLY ANIMAL SHELTER, COUNTIES ONLY ANIMAL SHELTER, COUNTIES ONLY ANIMAL SHELTER,
NOT COUNTIES ONLY ANIMAL SHELTER,
NOT THE COUNTIES ONLY ANIMAL SHELTER,
NOT THE PETS COUNTIES ONLY ANIMAL SHELTER,
NOT THE PETS BUT COUNTIES ONLY ANIMAL SHELTER,
NOT THE PETS BUT THE COUNTIES ONLY ANIMAL SHELTER,
NOT THE PETS BUT THE STAFF NOT THE PETS BUT THE STAFF NOT THE PETS BUT THE STAFF
WORKING NOT THE PETS BUT THE STAFF
WORKING THERE. WORKING THERE. WORKING THERE.
>>WORKING THERE.
>>INDIVIDUAL WORKING THERE.
>>INDIVIDUAL STAFF WORKING THERE.
>>INDIVIDUAL STAFF HAVE WORKING THERE.
>>INDIVIDUAL STAFF HAVE HAD WORKING THERE.
>>INDIVIDUAL STAFF HAVE HAD [email protected]>>INDIVIDUAL STAFF HAVE HAD [email protected]>>INDIVIDUAL STAFF HAVE HAD [email protected]
THINK>>INDIVIDUAL STAFF HAVE HAD [email protected]
THINK A>>INDIVIDUAL STAFF HAVE HAD [email protected]
THINK A FEELING>>INDIVIDUAL STAFF HAVE HAD [email protected]
THINK A FEELING OF>>INDIVIDUAL STAFF HAVE HAD [email protected]
THINK A FEELING OF BEING>>INDIVIDUAL STAFF HAVE HAD [email protected]
THINK A FEELING OF BEING UNDER THINK A FEELING OF BEING UNDER THINK A FEELING OF BEING UNDER
FIRE THINK A FEELING OF BEING UNDER
FIRE FOR THINK A FEELING OF BEING UNDER
FIRE FOR A THINK A FEELING OF BEING UNDER
FIRE FOR A VERY THINK A FEELING OF BEING UNDER
FIRE FOR A VERY [email protected] THINK A FEELING OF BEING UNDER
FIRE FOR A VERY [email protected] TIME.>>FIRE FOR A VERY [email protected] TIME.>>FIRE FOR A VERY [email protected] TIME.>>
THE FIRE FOR A VERY [email protected] TIME.>>
THE TIME FIRE FOR A VERY [email protected] TIME.>>
THE TIME IT FIRE FOR A VERY [email protected] TIME.>>
THE TIME IT WAS FIRE FOR A VERY [email protected] TIME.>>
THE TIME IT WAS UNDER FIRE FOR A VERY [email protected] TIME.>>
THE TIME IT WAS UNDER HIS THE TIME IT WAS UNDER HIS THE TIME IT WAS UNDER HIS
CONTROL? CONTROL? CONTROL?
>>CONTROL?
>>CERTAINLY.>>CERTAINLY.>>CERTAINLY.
>>>>CERTAINLY.
>>Reporter:>>CERTAINLY.
>>Reporter: WHEN>>CERTAINLY.
>>Reporter: WHEN THE>>CERTAINLY.
>>Reporter: WHEN THE THEN>>Reporter: WHEN THE THEN>>Reporter: WHEN THE THEN
COUNTY>>Reporter: WHEN THE THEN
COUNTY EXECUTIVE>>Reporter: WHEN THE THEN
COUNTY EXECUTIVE TOOK>>Reporter: WHEN THE THEN
COUNTY EXECUTIVE TOOK OVER>>Reporter: WHEN THE THEN
COUNTY EXECUTIVE TOOK OVER SIDE COUNTY EXECUTIVE TOOK OVER SIDE COUNTY EXECUTIVE TOOK OVER SIDE
OF COUNTY EXECUTIVE TOOK OVER SIDE
OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE TOOK OVER SIDE
OF THE ANIMAL COUNTY EXECUTIVE TOOK OVER SIDE
OF THE ANIMAL SHELTER COUNTY EXECUTIVE TOOK OVER SIDE
OF THE ANIMAL SHELTER AND OF THE ANIMAL SHELTER AND OF THE ANIMAL SHELTER AND
PROMISE OF THE ANIMAL SHELTER AND
PROMISE YOUR OF THE ANIMAL SHELTER AND
PROMISE YOUR PETS OF THE ANIMAL SHELTER AND
PROMISE YOUR PETS WOULD OF THE ANIMAL SHELTER AND
PROMISE YOUR PETS WOULD BE OF THE ANIMAL SHELTER AND
PROMISE YOUR PETS WOULD BE PUT PROMISE YOUR PETS WOULD BE PUT PROMISE YOUR PETS WOULD BE PUT
DOWN, PROMISE YOUR PETS WOULD BE PUT
DOWN, DYSFUNCTION PROMISE YOUR PETS WOULD BE PUT
DOWN, DYSFUNCTION FOLLOWED PROMISE YOUR PETS WOULD BE PUT
DOWN, DYSFUNCTION FOLLOWED IN PROMISE YOUR PETS WOULD BE PUT
DOWN, DYSFUNCTION FOLLOWED IN A DOWN, DYSFUNCTION FOLLOWED IN A DOWN, DYSFUNCTION FOLLOWED IN A
NEW DOWN, DYSFUNCTION FOLLOWED IN A
NEW AUDIT DOWN, DYSFUNCTION FOLLOWED IN A
NEW AUDIT OF DOWN, DYSFUNCTION FOLLOWED IN A
NEW AUDIT OF THE DOWN, DYSFUNCTION FOLLOWED IN A
NEW AUDIT OF THE SHELTER, DOWN, DYSFUNCTION FOLLOWED IN A
NEW AUDIT OF THE SHELTER, THE NEW AUDIT OF THE SHELTER, THE NEW AUDIT OF THE SHELTER, THE
CHAOS NEW AUDIT OF THE SHELTER, THE
CHAOS IS NEW AUDIT OF THE SHELTER, THE
CHAOS IS CONFIRMED NEW AUDIT OF THE SHELTER, THE
CHAOS IS CONFIRMED SPECIFICALLY CHAOS IS CONFIRMED SPECIFICALLY CHAOS IS CONFIRMED SPECIFICALLY
AROUND CHAOS IS CONFIRMED SPECIFICALLY
AROUND A CHAOS IS CONFIRMED SPECIFICALLY
AROUND A BOX CHAOS IS CONFIRMED SPECIFICALLY
AROUND A BOX [email protected] CHAOS IS CONFIRMED SPECIFICALLY
AROUND A BOX [email protected] A CHAOS IS CONFIRMED SPECIFICALLY
AROUND A BOX [email protected] A FORM. AROUND A BOX [email protected] A FORM. AROUND A BOX [email protected] A FORM.
FILL AROUND A BOX [email protected] A FORM.
FILL OUT AROUND A BOX [email protected] A FORM.
FILL OUT ONE AROUND A BOX [email protected] A FORM.
FILL OUT ONE SURROUNDING AROUND A BOX [email protected] A FORM.
FILL OUT ONE SURROUNDING [email protected] AROUND A BOX [email protected] A FORM.
FILL OUT ONE SURROUNDING [email protected]@ FILL OUT ONE SURROUNDING [email protected]@ FILL OUT ONE SURROUNDING [email protected]@
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
OR [email protected]
OR E, [email protected]
OR E, SHORT [email protected]
OR E, SHORT FOR [email protected]
OR E, SHORT FOR OWNER [email protected]
OR E, SHORT FOR OWNER REQUESTS OR E, SHORT FOR OWNER REQUESTS OR E, SHORT FOR OWNER REQUESTS
EUTHANASIA. EUTHANASIA. EUTHANASIA.
ACCORDING EUTHANASIA.
ACCORDING TO EUTHANASIA.
ACCORDING TO THE EUTHANASIA.
ACCORDING TO THE AUDIT EUTHANASIA.
ACCORDING TO THE AUDIT MANY EUTHANASIA.
ACCORDING TO THE AUDIT MANY PET ACCORDING TO THE AUDIT MANY PET ACCORDING TO THE AUDIT MANY PET
OWNERS ACCORDING TO THE AUDIT MANY PET
OWNERS DID ACCORDING TO THE AUDIT MANY PET
OWNERS DID NOT ACCORDING TO THE AUDIT MANY PET
OWNERS DID NOT KNOW ACCORDING TO THE AUDIT MANY PET
OWNERS DID NOT KNOW THAT’S ACCORDING TO THE AUDIT MANY PET
OWNERS DID NOT KNOW THAT’S WHAT OWNERS DID NOT KNOW THAT’S WHAT OWNERS DID NOT KNOW THAT’S WHAT
THEY OWNERS DID NOT KNOW THAT’S WHAT
THEY WERE OWNERS DID NOT KNOW THAT’S WHAT
THEY WERE AUTHORIZING OWNERS DID NOT KNOW THAT’S WHAT
THEY WERE AUTHORIZING AND OWNERS DID NOT KNOW THAT’S WHAT
THEY WERE AUTHORIZING AND THE THEY WERE AUTHORIZING AND THE THEY WERE AUTHORIZING AND THE
STAFF THEY WERE AUTHORIZING AND THE
STAFF WAS THEY WERE AUTHORIZING AND THE
STAFF WAS CONFUSED THEY WERE AUTHORIZING AND THE
STAFF WAS CONFUSED AS THEY WERE AUTHORIZING AND THE
STAFF WAS CONFUSED AS WELL.>>STAFF WAS CONFUSED AS WELL.>>STAFF WAS CONFUSED AS WELL.>>
DO STAFF WAS CONFUSED AS WELL.>>
DO WE STAFF WAS CONFUSED AS WELL.>>
DO WE [email protected] STAFF WAS CONFUSED AS WELL.>>
DO WE [email protected] HOW STAFF WAS CONFUSED AS WELL.>>
DO WE [email protected] HOW MANY STAFF WAS CONFUSED AS WELL.>>
DO WE [email protected] HOW MANY OF STAFF WAS CONFUSED AS WELL.>>
DO WE [email protected] HOW MANY OF THOSE DO WE [email protected] HOW MANY OF THOSE DO WE [email protected] HOW MANY OF THOSE
BOXES DO WE [email protected] HOW MANY OF THOSE
BOXES WERE DO WE [email protected] HOW MANY OF THOSE
BOXES WERE CHECKED?>>DO WE [email protected] HOW MANY OF THOSE
BOXES WERE CHECKED?>>THE BOXES WERE CHECKED?>>THE BOXES WERE CHECKED?>>THE
ASSUMPTION BOXES WERE CHECKED?>>THE
ASSUMPTION IS BOXES WERE CHECKED?>>THE
ASSUMPTION IS THAT BOXES WERE CHECKED?>>THE
ASSUMPTION IS THAT ALL BOXES WERE CHECKED?>>THE
ASSUMPTION IS THAT ALL OWNER BOXES WERE CHECKED?>>THE
ASSUMPTION IS THAT ALL OWNER [email protected] ASSUMPTION IS THAT ALL OWNER [email protected] ASSUMPTION IS THAT ALL OWNER [email protected]
SURRENDERS ASSUMPTION IS THAT ALL OWNER [email protected]
SURRENDERS WERE ASSUMPTION IS THAT ALL OWNER [email protected]
SURRENDERS WERE REQUESTED ASSUMPTION IS THAT ALL OWNER [email protected]
SURRENDERS WERE REQUESTED TO SURRENDERS WERE REQUESTED TO SURRENDERS WERE REQUESTED TO
ASK SURRENDERS WERE REQUESTED TO
ASK THE SURRENDERS WERE REQUESTED TO
ASK THE CHECK SURRENDERS WERE REQUESTED TO
ASK THE CHECK THAT SURRENDERS WERE REQUESTED TO
ASK THE CHECK THAT BOX ASK THE CHECK THAT BOX ASK THE CHECK THAT BOX
REGARDLESS ASK THE CHECK THAT BOX
REGARDLESS [email protected] ASK THE CHECK THAT BOX
REGARDLESS [email protected] WHETHER ASK THE CHECK THAT BOX
REGARDLESS [email protected] WHETHER THEY ASK THE CHECK THAT BOX
REGARDLESS [email protected] WHETHER THEY WE REGARDLESS [email protected] WHETHER THEY WE REGARDLESS [email protected] WHETHER THEY WE
REQUESTING REGARDLESS [email protected] WHETHER THEY WE
REQUESTING EUTHANASIA REGARDLESS [email protected] WHETHER THEY WE
REQUESTING EUTHANASIA OR REGARDLESS [email protected] WHETHER THEY WE
REQUESTING EUTHANASIA OR JUST REQUESTING EUTHANASIA OR JUST REQUESTING EUTHANASIA OR JUST
SURRENDERING REQUESTING EUTHANASIA OR JUST
SURRENDERING THEIR REQUESTING EUTHANASIA OR JUST
SURRENDERING THEIR ANIMAL REQUESTING EUTHANASIA OR JUST
SURRENDERING THEIR ANIMAL FOR REQUESTING EUTHANASIA OR JUST
SURRENDERING THEIR ANIMAL FOR [email protected] SURRENDERING THEIR ANIMAL FOR [email protected] SURRENDERING THEIR ANIMAL FOR [email protected]
ANOTHER SURRENDERING THEIR ANIMAL FOR [email protected]
ANOTHER CAUSE.>>SURRENDERING THEIR ANIMAL FOR [email protected]
ANOTHER CAUSE.>>IS SURRENDERING THEIR ANIMAL FOR [email protected]
ANOTHER CAUSE.>>IS POSSIBLE ANOTHER CAUSE.>>IS POSSIBLE ANOTHER CAUSE.>>IS POSSIBLE
SOME ANOTHER CAUSE.>>IS POSSIBLE
SOME OF ANOTHER CAUSE.>>IS POSSIBLE
SOME OF THOSE ANOTHER CAUSE.>>IS POSSIBLE
SOME OF THOSE PETS ANOTHER CAUSE.>>IS POSSIBLE
SOME OF THOSE PETS WERE ANOTHER CAUSE.>>IS POSSIBLE
SOME OF THOSE PETS WERE STILL SOME OF THOSE PETS WERE STILL SOME OF THOSE PETS WERE STILL
ADOPTED SOME OF THOSE PETS WERE STILL
ADOPTED OUT SOME OF THOSE PETS WERE STILL
ADOPTED OUT BUT SOME OF THOSE PETS WERE STILL
ADOPTED OUT BUT IT’S SOME OF THOSE PETS WERE STILL
ADOPTED OUT BUT IT’S IMPOSSIBLE SOME OF THOSE PETS WERE STILL
ADOPTED OUT BUT IT’S [email protected] ADOPTED OUT BUT IT’S [email protected] ADOPTED OUT BUT IT’S [email protected]
TO ADOPTED OUT BUT IT’S [email protected]
TO KNOW ADOPTED OUT BUT IT’S [email protected]
TO KNOW HOW ADOPTED OUT BUT IT’S [email protected]
TO KNOW HOW MANY ADOPTED OUT BUT IT’S [email protected]
TO KNOW HOW MANY WERE ADOPTED OUT BUT IT’S [email protected]
TO KNOW HOW MANY WERE PUT ADOPTED OUT BUT IT’S [email protected]
TO KNOW HOW MANY WERE PUT DOWN TO KNOW HOW MANY WERE PUT DOWN TO KNOW HOW MANY WERE PUT DOWN
AGAINST TO KNOW HOW MANY WERE PUT DOWN
AGAINST THEIR TO KNOW HOW MANY WERE PUT DOWN
AGAINST THEIR [email protected] TO KNOW HOW MANY WERE PUT DOWN
AGAINST THEIR [email protected] WISHES.>AGAINST THEIR [email protected] WISHES.>AGAINST THEIR [email protected] WISHES.>
PEOPLE AGAINST THEIR [email protected] WISHES.>
PEOPLE NEED AGAINST THEIR [email protected] WISHES.>
PEOPLE NEED [email protected] AGAINST THEIR [email protected] WISHES.>
PEOPLE NEED [email protected] INFORMATION PEOPLE NEED [email protected] INFORMATION PEOPLE NEED [email protected] INFORMATION
ABOUT PEOPLE NEED [email protected] INFORMATION
ABOUT WHAT PEOPLE NEED [email protected] INFORMATION
ABOUT WHAT HAPPENS PEOPLE NEED [email protected] INFORMATION
ABOUT WHAT HAPPENS OR PEOPLE NEED [email protected] INFORMATION
ABOUT WHAT HAPPENS OR WHAT ABOUT WHAT HAPPENS OR WHAT ABOUT WHAT HAPPENS OR WHAT
COULD ABOUT WHAT HAPPENS OR WHAT
COULD HAPPEN ABOUT WHAT HAPPENS OR WHAT
COULD HAPPEN BUT ABOUT WHAT HAPPENS OR WHAT
COULD HAPPEN BUT [email protected] ABOUT WHAT HAPPENS OR WHAT
COULD HAPPEN BUT [email protected] NOT COULD HAPPEN BUT [email protected] NOT COULD HAPPEN BUT [email protected] NOT
AUTOMATICALLY COULD HAPPEN BUT [email protected] NOT
AUTOMATICALLY INCLUDE

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *