09/17/18 Budget & Finance Committee


. OF WE NEED ONE MORE . YES I DON’T UNDERSTAND WHAT I’M GOING . WE NOW HAVE A QUORUM WILL BEGIN OR RESOLUTIONS OURS TWENTY EIGHTEEN THIRTEEN NINETY SPONSORS DAVIS ANTHONY DAVIS WEATHER’S AUTHORIZES THE METRO DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AGENCIES TO ENTER INTO A PILE IN AGREEMENT ON THE SET PAYMENTS IN LIEU AVELAR ON TAXES WITH RESPECT. TO A MULTI FAMILY HOUSING PROJECT LOCATED AT THREE HUNDRED EAST WEBSTER STREET IS THERE A MOTION. HAS BEEN MOVED AND PROPERLY SECONDED CNO DISCUSSION ALL IN FAVOR. OPPOSED RESOLUTION PASSES OURS TWENTY EIGHTEEN THIRTEEN NINETY ONE SPONSORS VERDURE AUTHORIZES THE ISSUE WENT SAILING PAYMENT OF GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS AND ADVOCATE. PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF NOT TO EXCEED SEVEN HUNDRED AND SEVENTY FIVE MILLION DOLLARS AND PROVIDES FOR THE LEVY OF TAXES FOR THE PAYMENT OF DEBT SERVICE ON THE BONDS. IS THERE A MOTION. IT’S BEEN MOVED AND PROPERLY SECONDED COUNCILMEN COOPER AT LARGE. THANK YOU — MADAM CHAIR — MAKE IT THEN THANK CHRIS FOR BEING HERE — THALIA AND I WERE DISCUSSING THIS EARLIER. OF OKAY — THE SO FIRST UP IN. IS NOT THIS BOND OFFERING SEVEN HUNDRED THIRTY FIVE MILLION BUT WOULD YOU TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE NEXT BOND OFFERING OF SIX HUNDRED AND FIFTY MILLION. AND WIN THAT IS EXPECTED. HERE SHE IS WE SHE AND I HAD. WE’LL HAVE OUR DIRECTOR OF ANY QUESTIONS ARE COMING. HELLO. IF YOU DIDN’T MIND AT THIS TALKING TO THE COUNCIL ABOUT NOT ONLY THIS BOND OFFERING OF SEVEN HUNDRED SEVENTY FIVE MILLION DOLLARS BUT THE NEXT BOND OFFERING OF SIX HUNDRED AND FIFTY MILLION. AND WHEN THAT IS CONTEMPLATED HAPPENING. BASED ON THE INFORMATION THAT WE HAVE PROVIDED THE METRO COUNCIL. OF THIS INFORMATION — HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN SUBMITTED BASED ON THE CURRENT AUTHORIZED PROJECTS. OF IN A CAPITAL SPENDING PLANS THAT HAVE OCCURRED SINCE TWO THOUSAND NINE WE ANTICIPATE. OF HAVING TO GO BACK OUT ABOUT. TWENTY FOUR OF FOR ANOTHER SIX HUNDRED A LITTLE OVER SIX HUNDRED MILLION. AND THEN IN TWENTY TWENTY FOUR WE WOULD HAVE TO GO OUT FOR THE REMAINING BALANCE. SOON THIS SEVEN HUNDRED THIRTY FIVE MILLION IT’S REALLY REFINANCING. BY AND LARGE ARE COMMERCIAL PAPER BALANCE WHICH IS CURRENTLY SIX HUNDRED AND FIFTY MILLION YES. SEVEN THE THE TOTAL AVAILABILITY IS ABOUT SEVEN HUNDRED MILLION BUT OF THE BUT WE ARE THREE THIS — BOND ISSUANCE WERE TAKEN OUT SIX HUNDRED AND SIXTY FIVE THE WORDING REFINANCING THIS AND THEN THE NEXT BOND OFFERING IS – FOR MONEY THAT WE ARE IN ANTICIPATING SPENDING FOR THE NEXT TWENTY FOUR MONTHS THE ADDITIONAL SIX HUNDRED AND FIFTY MILLION EXACTLY BASED ON PREVIOUSLY AGAIN I CAN’T SAY ENOUGH BASED ON PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED CAPITAL SPENDING PLANS SO OUR BACKLOG LAST MAY WHEN THE TREASURER DID THE REPORT FOR US WAS. ABOUT ONE POINT SIX BILLION WHAT IS IT TODAY I THINK IT’S ABOUT ONE POINT. FIVE THE LAST I LOOKED. S. SO IT STILL ONE POINT FIVE SO IF WE GO THROUGH THE SEVEN SEVENTY FIVE PLUS THE SIX FIFTY THAT IS REALLY JUST PAYING FOR OUR BACKLOG AND THAT’S NOT INCLUDING ANY NET NEW ADDITIONAL SPENT EXACTLY — THE IT DOES NOT INCLUDE ANTICIPATION OF ANY NEW CAPITAL SPENDING PLANS TO BE BROUGHT BEFORE THE SUB COMMITTEE SO IN TWENTY TWENTY WHAT WILL RGO BONDED INDEBTEDNESS NUMBER BE AFTER THE SIX HUNDRED AND FIFTY MILLION DOLLAR OFFER. GIVE ME JUST A SECOND. I WAS GONNA . BUT EVIDENCE OF OKAY BUT IT WOULDN’T BE COMPLETELY INCORRECT TO TAKE. THE TWO POINT SEVEN PLUS SEVEN SEVENTY FIVE PLUS SIX FIFTY AND WE MIGHT HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF AMORTIZATION. OF THE ONLY THE ONLY DIFFERENCE I THINK WOULD BE MADE INTEREST CALL STILL MAY BE — ISSUE WHAT’S CALLS BUT THE PRINCIPLE WOULD BE THE SIGN [inaudible] OKAY — END UP WITH NO NET SPENDING SO IN EVERY AMOUNT OF MONEY. ALLOCATED BY THIS COUNCIL IN THE CAPITAL SPENDING PLAN MAYBE THIS YEAR NEXT YEAR WOULD BE IN ADDITION TO THE STATE LEVEL ABSOLUTELY. OKAY — AND A HUNDRED MILLION. UP IN INTEREST CHARGES REALLY ARE DUE TO THE SEVEN SEVENTY FIVE PLUS THE SIX FIFTY SO THE SEVEN THIRTY FIVE WHICH IS A COMMERCIAL PAPER RIGHT NOW VERY LOW INTEREST RATE YOU START PAYING A DEBT SERVICE CONSTANT ON THAT OF FORTY FIVE TO FIFTY MILLION DOLLARS AND THEN THE SIX FIFTY WOULD. BE AN ADDITIONAL FORTY MILLION DOLLARS AND DATA SERVICES COMING LATER BECAUSE WE WOULD BE RUNNING THE SIX FIFTY AGAIN THROUGH THE COMMERCIAL PAPER. PROGRAM WILL TELL YOU SOME AND BONDED AND HUNDRED MILLION DOLLAR P CHARGE AND THAT SERVICE WOULD WOULD BE TO THE CITY — OKAY VERY BRACING NEWS HAVE TO SAY THANK YOU BOTH — AND I’M SURE THEY’LL BE OTHER QUESTIONS AND IF YOU DIDN’T MIND DO YOU WANT TO LIGHT ALL THE PROJECTION OF WHAT THE GEO BONDED INDEBTEDNESS WOULD BE. AT THE END OF THE SIX FIFTY FOR THE NEXT ONE THANK YOU. HELLO MEXICANS AND THAT YOU CAN SEND OUT SO WE CAN GET IT OUT TO THEM TO ENTIRE COMMITTEE AND I JUST WANT TO STRESS ALSO THAT THIS IS — FOR OUR PROJECTS THIS ALREADY BEEN AUTHORIZED. CANCEL ANY ALAN. THANK YOU MADAM CHAIR I DON’T HAVE THE FINANCE BACKGROUND THAT MR GRUBER HAS SO I’M. I’M STARTING FROM SOMEONE OF A POSITION OF IGNORANCE. WHEN I LOOK AT THE DEBT SERVICE FINDS? LISTING IN THE IN THE BUDGET BOOK. IT SHOWS EVERYTHING THAT WE’VE ISSUED STARTING BACK IN TWO THOUSAND NINE AND IT SHOWS GENERALLY KIND OF A A REFUNDING BOND ISSUE AND THEN IMPROVEMENT BOND ISSUE. WAS AROUND A HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS A YEAR. PLUS. AND SO I’M TRYING TO UNDERSTAND. UNTIL HE’S EXPLAINED IT TO MEAN TIRE LIKE I APOLOGIZE IT IT IT HADN’T SUNK IN YET SO IF YOU. USE SIMPLE WORDS AND TRY AGAIN – IF WE BEEN ISSUE IN THOSE ON A YEARLY BASIS. WHAT PROJECTS WERE THOSE COVERING WERE THOSE COVERING PROJECTS THAT WERE AUTHORIZED IN TWO THOUSAND FIVE OR TEN YEARS BEFORE OR? AND AND NONE OF THOSE ARE IS ANYWHERE NEAR AS BIG AS THIS ONE SO HAD A BIG JUMP FROM A TWO HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLAR BOND ISSUE THE LAST TIME WE DID IT. TO SEVEN SEVENTY FIVE I THINK A ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT THE INITIAL RESOLUTIONS LET ME JUST SPEAK TO I THINK GUY YOU’RE NOT SURE AT LEAST ONE EMAIL. AND I’LL JUST TRY TO WIN YOU MAYBE ONE AHEAD OF ME SO AND AND AND I’LL JUST RESTATE WHAT I THOUGHT THAT EMAIL MATT. AND THEN WHAT MY RESPONSE WAS OF THE COUNCIL MEMBER HEAD — TO ASK — SHE WAS LOOKING AT SOME THAT SCHEDULES WHY THERE WOULD. STILL BE SOME — EXPENSES LISTED FOR LEARN. AND AND WHY THOSE WOULD BE CONSIDERED IN THIS BOND ISSUANCE OF WHAT — WHAT I’D TRY TO EXPLAIN WAS THAT WHEN WE AUTHORIZE CAPITAL CAPITAL PROJECTS OR LONG TERM PROJECTS? AND SIMPLY — THAT THE EXPENSES WILL OCCUR OVER MANY YEARS AND SO THAT WHEN YOU GO WHEN YOU DO A BOND ISSUE WHICH YOU ARE NOT NECESSARILY GOING TO TAKE OUT. THE A AND B. ISSUING THE BONDS FOR THE COMPLETE CAPITAL SPENDING PLAN FOR A PARTICULAR AUTHORIZED AMOUNT. LIKE IN THIS IN THIS PLAN YOU MAY HAVE SOME PROJECTS THAT WERE AUTHORIZED IN. TWO THOUSAND SIXTEEN BUT THAT DOESN’T MEAN THAT WE HAVE SPENT EVERYTHING THAT WAS AUTHORIZED IN THE CAPITAL IN THE FY SIXTEEN CAPITAL SPENDING PLAN. INSTEAD YOU WOULD SEE EXPENSES OVER A MULTI YEAR PERIOD JUST THINK ABOUT SOME OF THE LONGER TERM PROJECTS THAT WE HAVE HAD. RAIN OKAY SO EACH EACH OF THESE YEARS AND I’M SEEIN PROBABLY THEY ALL SPEND TEN YEAR OR SOMETHING. A SPAN MANY YEARS ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU HAVE PROJECTS THAT ARE. IN THE CAPITAL SPENDING PLAN FOR KIND OF WHAT I’M GONNA CHARACTERIZES OMNIBUS PROJECTS SUCH AS OF SIDEWALKS. YOU JUST HAVE A A BUCKET OF% SIDEWALK MONEY WHERE YOU MAY BE SPENDING THAT OVER TEN OR TWELVE YEAR PERIOD. RIGHT. OKAY SO IN IN THE THE LAST PIECE OF THAT QUESTION WAS. AGAIN IF I’M UNDERSTANDING THIS RIGHT THOSE BOND ISSUES LOOKED LIKE THEY WERE. MORE ON THE ORDER OF THAT TWO HUNDRED AND SOMETHING MAY IN. AND I THOUGHT THAT THOSE SO IT’S IT’S PAGE. J. NINETY POINT SEVEN OUT OF THE BUDGET BOOK. IF THAT HELPS ANYBODY ANY [inaudible] SOME. SO I I’M JUST TRYING AGAIN UNDERSTAND HOW WE HOWARD A SEVEN HUNDRED SEVENTY FIVE MILLION WHEN THEY’VE GENERALLY BEEN TWO HUNDRED FIFTY MILLION — WORK OR SMALLER I THINK WHAT YOU’RE LOOKING AT IS WE WE DON’T ISSUE GENERAL OBLIGATION NEW MANAGER OBLIGATION BONDS EVERY YEAR OKAY SOME OF THE REFUNDING BONDS. DEPENDING ON WHAT WE TAKE OUT MAKES UP THE SIZE OF THOSE BONDS SO WE’RE ABLE TO REFUND BONDS FOR SAVINGS. IT COULD BE ANYWHERE FROM A HUNDRED MILLION TO THREE OR FOUR FOUR MILLION RIGHT BUT THE WAY WE ISSUE. R. G. O. BOND JUST REFINED COMMERCIAL WE TYPICALLY HAVE DONE THAT WHEN WE GET. TO WELL THE PROGRAM JUMP FROM FIVE HUNDRED SO — MANY A FEW YEARS AGO SO WE WOULD DO THAT SOMEWHERE BETWEEN. THREE FIFTY OF FIVE HUNDRED MAY OF TWO TIMING THE DONE WITH OVER. TIME THE BOND MARKET BUT TIMING WE ONE ISSUE THE BONDS SO. DOES THIS ONE JUST WE WE GREW IT TO SEVEN HUNDRED AND AND TAKING IT ALL AT ONE POINT BUT IT’S NO DIFFERENT THAN THE SMALLER ONES THAT WE DID EARLIER — AND AGAIN THE THE PROGRAMMING FOR FIVE HUNDRED SEVEN MILLION JUST A COUPLE YEARS AGO. TOUCH AND SOME ALSO IN THE PAST SOMETHING IN IT MEAN IT’S LIKE EVERY OTHER ONE THERE’S AN IMPROVEMENT BOND AND THEN A REFUND FUNDING BOND AND THEN A THEN IMPROVEMENT BOND EVERY SO OFTEN SO THE IMPROVEMENT BONDS ARE THE PAYING OFF THE CAPITAL. THREE IMPROVE PARTIAL NEED NEW MONEY TO PAY OFF THE COMMERCIAL PAPER REFUNDING BONDS ARE THE OPPORTUNITIES TO REFINANCE. OUTSTANDING BONDS TO GET A LOWER INTEREST RATE ON RIGHT SO I CAN JUST ADD ALL THOSE TOGETHER TO SUMMON REPLACE SOME OF THE PRE THAT PART MAKES. MAKES SENSE BUT IT SOUNDS LIKE WE’VE NEVER OUT THE ENTIRE COMMERCIAL PAPER FOR WHEN IT WAS FIVE HUNDRED MILLION FOR EXAMPLE BECAUSE I DON’T SEE AN IMPROVEMENT. BOND ISSUE HERE FOR FIVE HUNDRED MILLION THAT’S CORRECT AND THIS ONE WE’RE NOW. THE THERE SEVEN UNDER MAY ACTUALLY OUTSTANDING AND COMMERCIAL PAPER AT THIS POINT WE’RE TAKING OUT SIX HUNDRED FIFTY MILLION WE ALWAYS LEAVE. A PORTION OF THE COMMERCIAL PAPER OUT TO KEEP THE PROGRAM OPEN IN THE MARKET SO WHEN WE DO GO BACK IT’S NOT STARTING OVER NEW AGAIN. AND SO WE WE WILL TAKE OUT THE WHOLE PROGRAM. JUST FOR AN OPERATIONAL STANDPOINT OKAY AND THEN ONE LAST QUESTION TELL YOU PROBABLY THE ANSWER THIS ONE TOO AND I HAD CAUGHT UP WITH YET. SO THIS WILL THIS WILL MAKE OUR DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT RELATIVE TO THE TOTAL. AND YOUR BUDGET ON THE ORDER NOW FOURTEEN OR 15% IS THAT IS THAT CORRECT. THAT IS CORRECT IS THAT IN A IN AN AREA THAT THE THE BOND RATING ISSUES ARE COMFORTABLE WITH. I THINK IT WILL BE — IMMEDIATELY — FOLLOWING — PASSAGE OF THIS WE WILL BE HAVING OUR CALLS WITH THE RATING AGENCIES SO WE WILL — I’M SURE THAT THEY WILL HAVE A LONG DISCUSSION WITH US ABOUT SOME OF THOSE METRICS. ENGINE OKAY THANK YOU APPRECIATE THE ANSWERS. BANK ACCOUNTS WOMAN. COUNSELING GLOVER. THANK EACH YEAR OKAY SO I THINK I HEARD THE ANSWER ONE OF MY QUESTIONS WE MOVED THE COMMERCIAL PAPER FROM FIVE HUNDRED MILLION TO SEVEN OR MILLION. IN THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS IS THAT RIGHT NOW THIS THING IS A LITTLE BIT LOWER THAN THAT BUT WE HAVE SEVEN OR MILLION THAT’S BEEN WITHIN THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS. OKAY. ALL RIGHT AND SO WITH THIS. AND LET ME MAKE SURE JUST UNDERSTOOD WHAT I THINK YOU JUST SAID. WE’RE BASICALLY GONNA WE’RE GONNA WE’RE GONNA CHARGE ALL OF THIS WE WENT OVER TO G. O. BOND. ORGAN REPLENISH NOW BASICALLY WHERE WE WILL HAVE FIFTY MILLION OUT THEIR COMMERCIAL PAPER — SO WE’LL HAVE IN ABOUT ANOTHER SIX HUNDRED FIFTY MILLION DOLLS THAT YOU GUYS COULD GO OUT AND DO STUFF WITH — THAT WE QUOTE APPROVED. RIGHT IT WOULD IT WOULD JUST BE IT WOULD BE STILL BE PROJECTS APART THEY HAVE RECEIVED AUTHORIZATION FROM SO HOW MUCH SPACE DO WE HAVE LEFT. BREAST COULD DO NEW STUFF. WHEN WE GO IN ON ALL OF THIS BODY WILL AT SOME TIME — OVER THE NEXT FEW MONTHS GET A CAPITAL SPIN A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE MAYOR. OF BEFORE THAT RECOMMENDATION COMES BEFORE YOU WE WILL HAVE THAT CONVERSATION AND WE WILL CONDUCT THAT ANALYSIS. TO BRING FORWARD A PLAN THAT THE CITY CAN SUPPORT WITH ITS FINANCES. OKAY WELL I THINK. YOUR DEFINITION OF WHAT THE CITY CAN SUPPORT MINE WILL BE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS TO BE VERY CLEAR ON THAT. THAT BEING SAID — I I’M TRYING I WILL TRY TO GO BACK AND LOOK AT ONE OF THE QUESTIONS THAT WA ASKED PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF THE SOCCER AND THE OTHER THINGS IS WHAT DID THE BOND. RATING COMPANIES THINK WAS GOING TO HAPPEN TO US WHEN WE GOT IN THE FOURTH QUARTER AND WE WE STARTED ISSUING ALL OF THIS ADDITIONAL — BOND AND WE WE NOW TAKE ON BECAUSE NOW WE DO IT WE’RE WE ARE SEEING FOUR BILLION IN GENERAL OBLIGATION PAPER — AND WHEN YOU TAKE ALL OF THAT WITH WITH REVENUE BONDS AND THEN YOU TAKE THE HEALTH INSURANCE YOU TAKE ALL OF THE COMBINED NOW WE’RE CLIMBING INTO THE NIGHT NOT NINE BILLION WE’RE NOW GETTING INTO THE TEN BILLION DOLLAR RANGE — UNLESS I COMPLETELY MY MATH IS WAY OFF I THINK WE’RE WE’RE PRETTY CLOSE. SO WHAT POINT DO WE FEEL LIKE THAT WE’VE WE’VE CROSSED THAT DANGER LINE — BECAUS OBVIOUSLY IT SAYS HERE WE GO TO START MAKING PAYMENTS IN — TWENTY NINETEEN WE ALL KNOW THE PAYMENTS ARE GOING TO GO UP — EVERY YEAR THERE AFTER FOR A BIT OF TIME — SO I’M I’M JUST REALLY TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO WE AS A COUNCIL. REAL THIS BACK IN AND SAY YOU KNOW WHAT I THINK WE PROBABLY SPENT ENOUGH RIGHT NOW. AND I APPRECIATE THE FACT THAT – BASES ALL WE’RE GONNA GET DOWN TO THE FUNDAMENTALS OF THE BASICS NOW WELL THAT MIGHT BE BECAUSE THAT’S ABOUT ALL WE CAN DO [inaudible] SO. WHAT WHAT WHAT IS GONNA BE THE CAPACITY ON THE COMMERCIAL PAPER WHEN WE FINISH? AS REALLY THINK IT’S IMPORTANT I’M NOT SURE. I’D HAVE TO GO BACK AND CONVERT CONFIRM WITH IS NOT WHAT THE NINE BILLION DOLLAR NUMBER MIGHT BE BUT THE GEO — OF OF COVERAGES NOT NINE BILLION DOLLARS NOW DO WE HAVE ANY AS A WHOLE DO WE HAVE — DEBT OUTSTANDING FOR METRO WATER SERVICES. YES BUT THAT IS BACKED THROUGH OF THE REVENUES FROM THE FEES OF FROM METRO WATER. OF THE ANYTHING ISSUED THROUGH THE SPORTS AUTHORITY WE HAVE A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT THEY’VE BEEN ISSUED THE REVENUE BONDS. SO IT’S IMPORTANT TO LOOK AT ALL WHAT REVENUE STREAMS ARE BEING USED — TO LOOK AT ANY — DEBT ISSUANCE THAT’S OUT THERE. NO I’LL — I DON’T WANT TO HAVE ANYBODY. ALL. OF HAVING THE IMPRESSION THAT FROM THE GEO SIDE OF THINGS THAT WE HAVE NINE BILLION DOLLARS OF OUTSTANDING DEBT SO LET ME. HELP YOU THREE TIMES LOOK LET ME REPEAT WHAT I SAID BECAUSE I I THOUGHT IT WAS RATHER CLEAR. ON G. O. BONDS WE’RE GONNA BE ABOUT FOUR POINT TWO BILLION WHEN THIS HAPPENS — WITH INTEREST AND EVERYTHING ELSE PAYMENTS. I BELIEVE I AM PRETTY CLOSE IT IF — BECAUSE THIS IS ONE OF THE QUESTIONS I ASKED WHEN WE’RE LOOKING AT THE SOCCER STADIUM I FELT LIKE WERE PROBABLY HAD IT BE HEADING TOWARD FOUR POINT TWO BILLION. SO THAT’S A GEO ON THE REVENUE BONDS YEAH WE ACTUALLY I I I I KNOW WHAT THE DIFFERENCES ARE. BUT HERE’S WHERE I THINK WE FAIL TO UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCES — FROM PERHAPS ADMINISTRATION VERSUS SOME OF SITTING OUT HERE THERE’S ONLY SO MANY DOLLARS IN NASHVILLE AND WE AND AND THE PEOPLE OF NATURALLY WANT TO RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING THESE OBLIGATIONS NO MATTER. IF THEIR REVENUE OR THREE G. O. OR WHATEVER THE CASE MAY BE WE’RE THE ONES WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING IT. AND IF WE GO BACK WE LOOK AT GEO’S. AND WE GO BACK TO ROUGH A LITTLE LESS THAN A BILLION DOLLARS WE OWED IN GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS WE’REGONNA BE OVER FOUR TIMES THAT BY THE TIME WHAT WILL WE HAVE CERTAINLY HAVE THE POTENTIAL BEING. OVER FOUR TIMES THAT BY THE TIME WE FINISH THIS YEAR. SO I THINK IT’S GOING TO BE — CRITICAL. THAT WE UNDEDERSTAND WHAT THE BD RATING IS GONNA LOOK LIKE I THINK IT’S ALSO IN THESE ARE QUESTIONS I REALLY WOULD LIKE TO HAVE ANSWERS TO AS AS A AS OPPOSED TO WILL GET HAT FOR YOU. AND WE NEVER GET IT SO WHAT I’D LIKE TO UNDERSTAND IS WHAT IS OUR BOND RATING GOING TO LOOK LIKE AT THE END OF THIS YEAR IF IN FACT THIS IS THE NUMBER OF WHERE WE ARE. AND OUR CAPACITY AS FOURS ARE OPERATIONAL BUDGET STARTS CLIMBING ON UP THERE IN THE 11121314% RANGE OF OPERATIONAL PAY OUR DEBT SERVICE. THEN WHAT WHAT’S IT GONNA DO TO REMIND WRITINGS AND IF IT IN FACT LOWERS OUR BOND RATINGS DOES DO WE HAVE THE POTENTIAL OF THESE PAYMENTS BEING INCREASED. BECAUSE WE MAY HAVE A FLUCTUATING INTEREST RIGHT. I DON’T KNOW THE ANSWER THAT BUT I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW THAT. ESPECIALLY WHEN WE WALK INTO THE REMAINDER OF PUT THE THE SPENDING WE MAY END UP DOING OKAY THANK EACH YEAR IN TERMS OF THE THE RATINGS. WE WILL KNOW WHAT THOSE OF RATINGS ARE WHEN WE GET TO THE COMPLETION OF THIS PROCESS AND WHEN WE GET THOSE WRITINGS WILL. SHARE THAT WITH THE METRO COUNCIL YOU. TO SHARE WITH THE COMMITTEE IS THAT. ALL YOU MAY RECALL THAT LAST YEAR WE HAD A SMALLER CAPITAL SPENDING PLAN THAN WHAT WE HAD HAD HAD FOR SEVERAL YEARS. AND IT’S BECAUSE WE HAD GONE IN AND WE HAD LOOKED. AT CAPACITY ISSUES AND WE HAD APPROACHED A WITCH PROJECT WE’RE GONNA BE FUNDED AND A VERY THOUGHTFUL WAY BECAUSE WE WERE CONSIDERING ALL OF THOSE ITEMS. WHEN WE DECIDED WHAT THOSE RECOMMENDATIONS SHOULD BE? SO IF I CAN GIVE YO ANY LEVEL OF ASSURANCE I CAN TELL YOU THAT ALL THE THINGS THAT YOU HAVE. JUST DISCUSSED OF JUST THEN WILL BE DISCUSSED AND WILL BE CONSIDERED AND WHEN BOT TO THIS COUNCIL YOU CAN BE SURE ASSURED THAT THEY HAVE BEEN FULLY VETTE. WELL I GUESS I CAN ASSURE YOU MY COMFORT LEVEL ON THE AMOUNT OF DEBT THE CITY HAS RIGHT NOW IS NOT ONE OF COMFORT. THANK EACH YEAR AND THEN THANK YOU COUNCILMAN LOVER MR HARMON CAN JUST MAKE SURE THAT YOU GET ALL THOSE QUESTIONS NOTED OF ACCOUNTS MY GLOVER. THEY JUST WOULDN’T NOTED THE THE DEBT SERVICE FOR THESE BONDS THAT ARE CURRENTLY ISSUE WILL NOT CHANGE DEPENDING ON WHATEVER HAPPENS WITH THE RATING THESE BUT THESE ARE SET SO THEY WILL NOT CHANGE. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THAT CLARITY COUNCILMEN COOPER AT LARGE. THANK YOU A MANAGER AND SUPER QUICKLY APPRECIATE — THIS HOMEWORK YOU ALL ARE WILLING TO DO FOR US I COULD JUST ADD TO IT A LITTLE BIT. AND THEY ARE A FEW WOULD PROJECT THAT ON THE CURRENTLY APPROPRIATED BUT NONE BONDED SPENDING THAT YOU ANTICIPATED. TWENTY TWENTY SO NOT ONLY THE OUTSTANDING DEBT BUT WHAT WE’RE GOING TO BE PAYING THE BACKLOG DOWN TO BUT THEN WE’LL STILL HAVE THAT ADDITIONAL BACKLOG BECAUSE WE WILL NOT. HAVE BEEN ABLE TO ACCOMPLISH THAT BY — TWENTY TWENTY I THINK THEN THAT IS A FREE TIMES ALREADY DONE THE MATH ON THAT HE SAID ABOUT THREE HUNDRED MILLION. I’M. VERY GOOD WELL IF YOU WOULD CIRCULATE THAT THAT THE COUNCIL SO THAT WE KNOW WHAT. AN AFFECT THE LIABILITIES ARE FROM. OPERATIONS UP UNTIL ANY FURTHER APPROPRIATIONS. AND THEN ALSO INCLUDE WITH THAT IF YOU DIDN’T MIND THE 5% FUND BALANCE — THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU SO MUCH COUNCILMAN SEEIN NO FURTHER DISCUSSION ALL IN FAVOR [inaudible] OPPOSED [inaudible] RESOLUTION PASSES. AUGUST TWENTY EIGHTEEN THIRTEEN NINETY TO SPONSOR OVERTURE APPROVES A GRANT FROM THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES TO THE OFFICE OF FAMILY SAFETY FOR THE CHERISHED HEARTS HUMAN TRAFFICKING. INTERVENTION COURT IS THERE A MOTION. IT’S BEEN MOVED AND PROPERLY SECONDED CNO DISCUSSION ALL IN FAVOR [inaudible] OPPOSED. RESOLUTION PASSES. OURS TWENTY EIGHTEEN THIRTEEN NINETY THREE SPONSORS VIRTUE ROBBERS APPROVES AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION AND THE METRO POLICE DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE POLICE ASSISTANCE TO THE MIDDLE TENNESSEE DRUG ENFORCEMENT TASK FORCE IS THERE A MOTION. AND MOVE THEM PROPERLY SECONDED CNO DISCUSSION ALL IN FAVOR. OPPOSED RESOLUTION PASSES. OURS TWENTY EIGHTEEN THIRTEEN NINETY FOUR SPONSORS SPONSOR VERDURE AUTHORIZES THE METRO DEPARTMENT OF LAW TO COMPROMISE AND SETTLE THE CLAIM OF ANDREA MILLER AGAINST WHAT’S IN MATIX AND THE AMOUNT OF FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS. AND REASONABLE ATTORNEY FEES NOT TO EXCEED EIGHTY THOUSAND DOLLARS IS THERE A MOTION. IT’S BEEN MOVED AND PROPERLY SECONDED [inaudible] COUNCILWOMAN GILMORE. THANK YOU CHAIR VIRTUAL AB — ONCE YOU KNOW OF BECAUSE I’M TAKING COUNCILMEMBER POLICE PLACE TODAY I HAVE A QUESTION I COULD FACE DOWN IN MIAMI I NOW HAD PLEASE WHY. AND HAVING FUN IF THERE WAS JUST A LITTLE BIT MORE DETAIL AND I SAW WITH THE OFFICER HAD — RETIRED BUT JUST WHAT INFORMATION THEY GATHER DURING THAT PROCESS THAT WOULD BE GREAT ELECTORS ON GETTING IT — METRO POLICE DEPARTMENT — SO THIS IS. RESULTED FROM MINNESOTA AND DOES A TRAFFIC STOP THAT OCCURRED IN AUGUST OF TWENTY ELEVEN SO IT’S BEEN A WHILE — THE OFFICER — STATED THAT HE OBSERVED — THE PLAN IN FRONT OF A STOP SIG- WENT TO NISHA TO STOP SHE FLED AT A HIGH RATE OF SPEED — INITIALLY AND PULLED INTO A DRIVEWAY — WANT TO PULL IN BEHIND HER — DETECTED AN ODOR OF MARIJUANA AND THEN — ASTOR STEP IN THE CAR SHE REPORTEDLY REFUSED HE REMOVED FROM THE VEHICLE WHICH YOU’VE RESISTED. AND SHE WAS ULTIMATELY ARRESTED THAT NIGHT FOR RECKLESS DRIVING AND RESISTING ARREST — WARRANTS WERE GRANTED — WENT TO LUMINARY HEARING — IT WAS BOUND OVER TO THE GRAND JURY ON A FINDING OF PROBABLE CALLS — THE DA’S OFFICE ADDED AN ADDITIONAL CHARGE FOR PHONY BAITING ARREST. AND THE GRAND JURY — INDICTED ON ALL THREE CHARGES — ULTIMATELY. IT WAS SET FOR TRIAL TEMPERATURE REVIEW. THERE WAS — DISCOVERED THAT THE OFFICER MADE AN ERROR WITH RESPECT TO THE INTERSECTION WHERE HE SAID THAT THE PLANE FRIEND STOPS ON AND THAT COUPLED WITH THE SOME OF THE FACTORS. BLOOD THE ADA TO DECIDE. NOT TO SEEK PROSECUTION SO THE CASE WAS KNOWLEDGE. ULTIMATELY LEAD THERE WAS A MOTION FILED TO DISMISS THE CASE IN IT THAT WAS GRANTED SO — THEN. SUIT WAS FILED — THERE IS A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WHICH WAS [inaudible] OFFICER. ONE THAT DECISION WAS APPEALED TO THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. AND THEN — ON A MATTER OF LAW IT WAS ENDED UP BEING REVERSED AND SENT BACK SO THAT’S KIND OF HOW WE ARE WHERE WE ARE. TODAY AND LIKE YOU NOTED IN THE ERROR ON THE OFFICER — LEFT THE DEPARTMENT. TWENTY FIFTEEN I ALSO WANT TO NOTE USING WHEN IT HAPPENED AS I SAY WHAT SHE DIDN’T FILE A COMPLAINT I’VE BEEN MADE AWARE THAT THEY CAN FILE A COMPLAINT WHEN THAT HAPPENS. WELL WE PRETTY EXTENSIVELY ADVERTISED THE DEAD. THE COMPLAINT PROCESS MEAN ONLINE ALL THE PRECINCTS HAVE COMPLAINED CARDS OPIATE AS OUR REACH SO. YOU KNOW WHEN WE DO WE CAN DO AS FAR AS LETTING PEOPLE KNOW ABOUT THEIR ABILITY TO FOLLOW BUT YET SHE NOTED AND ONE WAS NOT FAULT IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE. AND THEN THE UPKEEP BY AN A DEMOGRAPHIC DATA FOR INCIDENTS LIKE THIS SO YOU CAN FIND OUT LIKE WHAT AREA THIS IS OCCURRING IN — GENDER RACE THAT TYPE OF THING. BUT WE DO WE KEEP — WE DO DOES STOP TRAFFIC FORMS SO FOR EVERY TRAFFIC STOP THE THAT OCCURS WE COLLECT DATA ON THE GENDER AND RACE AND LOCATION OF THE STOP WHAT THE MAIN REASON FOR THE STOP AND THAT SORT OF THING YES OKAY BUT IS MORE LIKE INDIVIDUALS NOTLIKE. COLLECTIVE AS IT RELATES TO MAYBE CASES OF SOME I WOULD JUST KIND OF TAKE IT AND ANALYZE IT IS EACH. ONE WE COLLECT MONEY TO STOP IN AND IN AND OUT WE DO ANALYSIS FROM TIME TO TIME USING THAT. THAT DATA THAT WE COLLECT THAT’S CORRECT SO HOW OFTEN DO YOU DO THE ANALYSIS. A JUST DEPENDS — WE USE IT WE’VE HAD OTHER — ENTITIES ASKED FOR THAT DATA. AND USE THAT DATA FOR STUDIES ON SO — IT’S AVAILABLE FOR INTERNAL EXTERNAL MEANS. OKAY SO MAYBE I CAN GET A SOME SOME FOLLOW UP AND JUST ON HOW OFTEN YOU KNOW DO THE ANALYSIS. WHEN WAS THE LAST ONE YOU YOU’VE DONE IN IT AND IF IF I COULD SEE THAT ONE ON ON ALL TRAFFIC STOP? LIKE IS IT A TOTAL ANALYSIS MORE IN DEPTH WEAKEN THE INFORMATION ORGANIZE I GUESS [inaudible] OKAY. MMHM CHECK THANK YOU [inaudible] COUNCILWOMAN ANDERSON. THANK YOUR FOR JR AND YOU MENTION THIS HAPPEN IS TWO THOUSAND ELEVEN AND I’M NOT SURE WHEN WE IMPLEMENTED DASH CAMERAS OR IF WE HAD THEM ON ALL CARS AT ALL TIMES BUT YOU SAID THAT WHEN THIS WENT TO PRE TRIAL THAT. THE DETERMINATION BASED ON THE NEST STATED CROSS STREET THAT THAT WAS A REASON. TO SETTLE BUT YOU ALSO SAID THERE WERE OTHER FACTORS — WAS THERE A DASH CAMERA RECORDING OF THIS ARREST DEL FRISCO’S NOT A QUOTE WITH IT CAMERA. OKAY — AND CAN YOU JUST SPEAK TO DASH CAMERAS KIND OF THE TIME LINE ON THAT — BASED ON CUT TWO THOUSAND ELEVEN AT THAT TIME THAT SOME OFFICERS HAVE THEM AND SOME DID NOT OR THE ONLY COLORS THAT WERE QUOTE WITH DASH CAMERAS. AT THAT TIME SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE D. Y. COURSE HOURS. AND AGGRESSIVE DRIVING IN IT VEHICLES OKAY SO WHAT SPECIFIC TO THAT UNIT BUT IF SOMEONE WERE TO SEE A TRAFFIC AT THAT TIME A TRAFFIC. PROBLEM THEY WOULDN’T NECESSARILY HAD ASKING JUST YOUR STANDARD PATROL OFFICERS DID NOT DASH CAMS AT THAT TIME THAT’S CORRECT AND DO ALL PATROL CARS HAVE DASH CAMERAS NOW. NOT YET THAT IS PART OF THE PACKAGE IT’S BEING REVIEWED WITH BODY WORN CAMERAS OKAY AND WHAT PERCENTAGE OF CARS HAVE DASH CAMERAS AT THIS TIME RIGHT NOW IT’S THE SAME IT’S THE DO YOU I UNITS INGRESSIVE DRIVING UNITS THAT HAVE CAMERAS. AND IT’S STILL THE SAME AS IT WAS IN TWO THOUSAND ELEVEN YES. AND DO YOU THINK A DASH CAMERA WOULD HAVE BEEN HELPFUL — TO BOTH THE CITY AND THE DEFENDANT — IN THIS SITTING AREA BECAUSE THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN. BUT EACH. TO NO BACK UP BOTH [inaudible] THAT MONEY’S. YOU KNOW THAT’S A QUESTION FOR PROBABLY. A DETERRENCE AND ON THE CASE BUT IT WOULD JUST DEPEND ON WHAT WHAT WAS ACTUALLY CAPTURED ON THE CAMERA MAN ALONSO ALSO DASH CAMERAS. YOU HAVE — DEPENDS ON THE WAY THE VEHICLE’S POSITION IF ANYTHING’S PICKED UP HOW FAR AWAY THE OFFICERS FROM THE CAR IF THERE’S ANY AUDIO SO IT MAY OR MAY NOT. ASSISTED ON A CORPORATION THAT – DIRECTOR KEEPER. AND DO YOU THINK — DASH CAMERA FOOTAGE WOULD HAVE BEEN HELPFUL. TO BOTH THE CITY AND TOM. I DID AGAIN IT DEPENDS ON WHAT THE DASH CAMERA. FOOTAGE SHOWED I MEAN IF IF IT SHOWED THE CROSS STREET OR I MEAN IT IT IT. IT ASKING RUSSIA CROSS STREETS% TONIGHT WELL IT DEPENDS ON HOW THE THE VEHICLE IS POSITIONED AS TO WHAT THE DASH CAMERA SHOWS SO I I MEAN IT COULD IT WILL MAKE SURE THAT WHEN WE HAVE DASH CAMERAS THEY WOULD SHOW CROSS STREETS RIGHT WHEN THAT THE IMPORTANT. THE THE VIEW SHED LIKE THE FIELD OF VISION OF THE CAMERA WHICH AT THINGS LIKE THAT. I’M NOT AN EXPERT IN DASH CAMERAS BUT I I WOULD THINK THAT A THE BROADEST FIELD VISION POSSIBLE WOULD BE BEST OKAY BUT I HOPE WE’RE GONNA BECOME EXPERTS IN THAT RIGHT BECAUSE WE’RE WANTING TO HAVE GOOD FOOTAGE DIRECTOR COOPER IT’S HELPFUL TO THE CITY AND TO OUR CITIZENS. THOSE CORRECT THANK YOU. THANK YOU COUNSEL WOMAN ANDERSON COUNTS MY PROB MORE. THANK YOU MADAM CHAIR — GET IN THE NOW IT’S IS IT SAID THAT THE OFFICER — RESIGNED WAS WAS THAT A RESULT OF THIS INCIDENT. BUT NONE THAT I’M AWARE OF HE RESIGNED IN — TWENTY FIFTEEN EVEN BEFORE HE WANTED SUMMARY JUDGMENT TWENTY SIXTEEN SO. I DON’T. TO MY KNOWLEDGE THAT WAS NOT RELATED AND HE WON THE THE JUDGE MIAMI METRO METRO ONE SUMMARY JUDGMENT — TWENTY SIXTEEN THERE WAS NO OTHER. WHAT WHY IS THE REASONING FOR I GUESS I SHOULD ASK MISTER COOPE? THE THE THE SETTLEMENT. WELL THE THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT THAT THAT WAS AWARDED — WAS APPEALED TO THE SIXTH CIRCUIT AND IT’S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT WAS REVERSED AND THEN. SO — I THINK IT’S ACTUALLY BEEN TO THE COURT OF APPEALS TWICE. AND AND NOW WE’RE AT THE THE TIME OF OF A SETTLING WORRY OR GOING TO TRIAL. AND IT IT’S A ESSENTIALLY. AT THIS POINT A HE SAID SHE SAI- IT THE THE PLAINTIFF WOULD MAKE A VERY GOOD WITNESS WOULD BE VERY SYMPATHETIC WITNESS AND SO WE THINK THAT — CERTAINLY FROM A BUSINESS STANDPOINT THIS IS THE BEST APPROACH FOR THE CITY. AND THERE ARE NOT SEEING THE SUMMARY OF THEM MAY BE MISTAKEN THAT. THERE WAS SOME LIABILITY AS FAR AS THE OFFICER GOES YES THE OFFICER WOULD BE — PERSONALLY LIABLE CORRECT. ALL RIGHT THANK YOU. THANK YOU COUNCILMEMBER UP MORE. SEEIN NO FURTHER DISCUSSION ALL IN FAVOR [inaudible] OPPOSED. RESOLUTION PASSES. ARE AS TWENTY EIGHTEEN THIRTEEN NINETY FIVE SPONSOR GLOVER. APPROPRIATE THREE HUNDRED AND SIXTY THOUSAND DOLLARS FROM THE GENERAL FUND RAISER FUN FOR THE PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT FOR THE NATIONAL FIRE DEPARTMENT COUNCILMAN GLOVER. THANK EACH YEAR — MISTER JAMISON — I’VE BEEN TALKING WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT THEY HAD A AND A REQUEST THAT ONE AND FOR THIS VERY SIMILAR THING. AND SO I WANT TO FIND OUT WHAT’S THE BEST WAY I’M GOING TO DEFER THIS — AND I READ THE ANALYSIS OF THE RULE SIXTEEN RUN I WANT TO TALK ABOUT THAT AT SOME POINT IN THE FUTUR- BECAUSE IT MAKES IT ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE FOR THIS BODY TO DO OUR JOB– BUT THAT BEING SAID WHAT’S THE BEST WAY FOR ME TO FOR THIS BECAUSE I ASKED THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT EARLIER TODAY. WHEN THIS 4% REQUEST WOULD BE COMING I WANNA MAKE SURE THIS IS A PART OF IT — BECAUSE WHITE YOU KNOW THIS IN MY OPINION IN THE OBSERVATIONS I’VE DONE IS AS CRITICAL EQUIPMENT FOR THEM SO ARE WE BETTER OFF TO DO A THEN I’LL GUESS I’LL ASK THIS WHAT. A AN INDEFINITE DEFERRAL AND IF I DON’T SEE IT COMING BACK ON 4% THEN I CAN — REENACT THE THE BILL CORRECT THAT’S CORRECT OKAY THEN J. I’M GONNA MOVE TO INVEST IN THEN INDEFINITELY DIFFER. SHE FOR YOU SICK INORDINATE DO YOU WANT TO BE RECOGNIZED — COUNCILMAN HAS MOVED FOR AN INDEFINITE DEFERRAL. AND WHILE YOU’RE COMING OUT JUST FOR THE VIEWING AUDIENCE I’M GOING TO GO TO MR HARMON — JUST CAN YOU BRIEFLY EXPLAIN LAYING SHOOT TO THE VIEWERS. AND FOR COMMITTEE MEMBERS THE THE PROCESS AS IT RELATES — 24% REQUEST FOR DEPARTMENTS. YES EARN CHAIR RICHARD THANK YO. THE 4% RESERVE FUND IS A POOL OF MONIES — THE RABBI OF FUND TRANSFER FROM THE GENERAL FUND REVENUE OF THE GENERAL SERVICES DISTRICT — THAT’S PROVIDED FOR IN THE CHARTER TO PROVIDE FUNDS FOR THE PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT AND OR THE REPAIR BUILDINGS. OF FOR THOSE DEPARTMENTS DERIVING PART OF THEIR OPERATING BUDGETS. FROM THE GST GENERAL FUND. OF THE MAYOR — TYPICALLY MAKES A RECOMMENDATION TO THE METRO COUNCIL AS TO THE APPROPRIATION OF 4% RIVER RESERVE FUNDS. OF AGAIN FOR THE PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT OR REPAIRS TO BUILDINGS OR FACILITIES. OF THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT MONITORS — THE RESERVE FUND THROUGHOUT THE FISCAL YEAR — AS IT PROGRESSES TO INSURE THAT WE HAVE ENOUGH REVENUE — WITHIN THAT FUND TO SUPPORT THE PORTION OF THOSE 4% REQUESTS FROM THE DEPARTMENTS — AS COUNCILMEMBER GLOVER STATED – WE ARE IN THE PROCESS OF CARRYING OUT OF THAT EVALUATION AND WE EXPECT TO BRING A 4% RESOLUTION. TO THE COUNCIL SOMETIME IN OCTOBER — THE BREAK I SHOULD SAY — THE AND EQUIPMENT AND ARE BUILDING REPAIRS THAT WOULD BE FUNDED OUT OF THIS. 4% FIND THOSE ARE INTENDED TO BE OF LESSER COST AND SHORTER LIFESPAN THAN THOSE ITEMS ARE PROJECTS THAT YOU WOULD TYPICALLY SEE. IN THE ANNUAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET — SO — IN IN ADDITION ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLAR BALANCE BE MAINTAINED IN THE FUND. AT ALL TIMES AND THE COUNCIL ADDED AN ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT OF FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND MAKING THE MINIMUM BALANCE IN THE 4% FUND. A MILLION DOLLARS. THANK YOU SO MUCH CHIEF. YES — CHIEF WILL SWINE MASTER FIRE DEPARTMENT I JUST WANTED TO BE KNOWN WE HAVE MADE OUR REQUESTS KNOWN — THROUGH THE 4% A REQUEST THROUG- BUT FINANCE AND WE WOULD LIKE TO GO THROUGH THE SAME PROCESS THAT ALL THE OTHER METRO DEPARTMENTS GO THROUGH. THANK YOU SO MUCH COUNTS MY LOVER JUST GLOWING GLOOMY CLOSE WITH THIS IF I MAY. WE DID NOT OFFER THE COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENTS THIS YEAR — YOU KNOW I WENT OUT AND SPENT AN EVENING WITH — ONE OF THE ONE OF THE COMPANIES OUT THERE TIME IN SOME OF THE FIRE HALLS AROUND THE CITY — THIS IS SOMETHING THAT IS REALLY I DON’T HAVE A FULL WORKING KNOWLEDGE OF BECAUSE IT’S NOT WHAT I DO WITH THIS PROTECTIVE GEAR. THAT APPARENTLY IS IS ESSENTIAL FOR THEM TO PROTECT THEMSELVES AND TO DO THEIR JOB AND SO I REALLY HOPE WE’RE GOING TO PUT IT IN THERE BECAUSE WE CAN’T IF WE CAN’T PAY THEM. WAS AT LEAST MAKE SURE WE AND WE CAN’T BUY AND WE JUST DON’T EVER PRIORITIES RIGHT IF WE’RE IF WE’RE NOT GONNA DO THAT LET’S MAKE SURE WE GIVEN THE EQUIPMENT THEY NEED THANK EACH YEAR THANK YOU COUNCILMEMBER UP THINK WE’VE ALREADY HEARD FROM THE CHIEF THAT HE’S HE’S. PUT IN THE REQUEST AS IT RELATES FOR HIS FOR HIS 4% REQUEST FOR HIS RESPECTIVE DEPARTMENT. OKAY IT’S THE MOTION TO INDEFINITELY DEFERRED. ALL IN FAVOR — OPPOSE. RESOLUTION IS INDEFINITELY DEFERRED. OURS TWENTY EIGHTEEN THIRTEEN NINETY SIX SPONSOR VIRTUE AND WEATHER’S. APPROVES THE BENEFIT BOARDS WHAT WAIVER A REPAYMENT OF PENSION BENEFIT OVER PAYMENTS FOR PENSIONERS IS THERE A MOTION. SPIN MOVE THEM PROPERLY SECONDED SANDEL DISCUSSION ALL IN FAVOR. OPPOSED RESOLUTION PASSES. OURS TWENTY EIGHTEEN THIRTEEN NINETY SEVEN SPONSORS VIRGIN WEATHER’S APPROVES AND A LOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE METRO DEPARTMENT NATIONAL ELECTRIC SERVICE. IN THE WILLIAMSON COUNTY JOINT COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK AUTHORITY FOR THE INTERFACE IN OF RADIO COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS IS THERE A MOTION. REMOVED IMPROPERLY SECOND IT CN% DISCUSSION ALL IN FAVOR. OPPOSED RESOLUTION PASSES ARE AS TWENTY EIGHTEEN THIRTEEN NINETY EIGHT SPONSORS VIRGIN WEATHER’S APPROVES A GRANT FROM THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT. TO THE NATIONAL CAREER ADVANCEMENT CENTER TO PROVIDE TRANSITIONAL ASSISTANCE FUNDING FROM STATE WHAT FUNDS TO CONTINUE SERVICES TO THE AMERICAN JOB CENTER DURING THE BROKE FOR SYSTEM ALLIANCES THEIR MOTION REALIGNMENT. SPIN MOVE THEM PROPERLY SECONDED COUNCILWOMAN ALLEN. THANK YOU MADAM CHAIR WE GOT LIKE THREE OR FOUR OF THESE IN A ROW AND IF I COULD JUST HAVE SOMEBODY COME UP AND KIND OF EXPLAIN WHAT THE DIFFERENT PARTS AND PIECES ARE APPRECIATED. AND IF THERE’S NO OBJECTION WE CAN TAKE THEM ALL AT ONCE — PATRICK ON THE EXACT DIRECTOR NATIONAL CAREER ADVANCEMENT CENTER — ALL OF THESE FUNDS RELATE TO THE STATE’S REALIGNMENT OF THE WORK FORCE THERE’S A THESE ARE TREATED. TRANSITIONAL FUNDS AT THE STAY PUT OUT TO HAVE — ACTIVITIES THROUGH THIS TRANSITION PERIOD MANAGING TRANSITION — HOLDING MEETINGS TO MAKING SURE THAT SERVICES ARE NOT — BROKEN FOR ANY OF OUR CUSTOMERS AND THE REASON THERE’S FOUR IS THAT THERE FOR FOUR DIFFERENT FUNDING STREAMS — ADULTS DISLOCATED WORKERS USE AND ADMINISTRATIVE. AND SO THAT IS THE THAT’S WHY THERE’S FOUR BILLS KIND OF ALL RIGHT AFTER THE IN ONE AFTER ANOTHER THANK YOU AND THE REALIGNMENT IS. WHAT WE REALIGNING? FINE WE ARE REALIGNING — THE STATE — USED TO HAVE THIRTEEN LOCAL WORKFORCE AREAS. KIND OF DIVIDING THE STATE OF IN THE THIRTEEN THEY RELY FROM THIRTEEN DOWN TO NINE TO MATCH THE STATE CCD AREAS. THE ANSWER ALL YOUR QUESTIONS COUNCILMAN. IF THERE’S NO OBJECTIONS WE CAN TAKE OURS 201-813-9813 NINETY NINE FOURTEEN HUNDRED AND FOURTEEN OH ONE IF THERE’S NO OBJECTION WE CAN TAKE THEM ALL TOGETHER NOT READ THE CAPTIONS. THANK YOU COUNSEL IN GLOVER OURS TWENTY EIGHTEEN THIRTEEN NINETY NINE SPONSORS VIRGIN WEATHER’S APPROVES A GRANT FROM THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT TO THE NASHVILLE CAREER ADVANCEMENT CENTER. TO PROVIDE TRANSITIONAL ASSISTANCE FUNDING FROM STATE RIGHT BONDS FOR MINISTRATION COSTS DURING THE WORK FOR SERVICE ALIGNMENT. ALWAYS TWENTY EIGHTEEN FOURTEEN THE WEATHER’S APPROVES AMENDMENTS TO TO A GRANT FROM THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT. TO THE NASHVILLE CAREER ADVANCEMENT CENTER TO ESTABLISH% CAREER SERVICES FOR ELIGIBLE ADULT AND DISLOCATED WORKERS. OURS TWENTY EIGHTEEN FORTINO ONE SPONSORS VIRGIN WEATHER’S APPROVES A GRANT FROM THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT TO THE NATURAL CAREER ADVANCEMENT CENTER. TO ESTABLISH PROGRAMS TO REPAIR DOT ADULT SERVICE RECIPIENTS FOR EMPLOYMENT. SAND NO FURTHER DISCUSSION ALL IN FAVOR ON THOSE RESOLUTIONS [inaudible] OPPOSED. RESOLUTION PASSES. YOU GET ALL SMOKE OKAY. OURS TWENTY EIGHTEEN FORTINO TO SPONSORS VERDURE GILMORE ROBERTS APPROVES A GRANT CONTRACT BETWEEN THE METRO BOARD OF HEALTH AND THE MENTAL HEALTH COOPERATIVE TO PROVIDE A SECURE DROP OFF LOCATION FOR PERSONS NEED IN THE MENTAL HEALTH URGENT CARE. ALTERNATIVE TO AN EMERGENCY ROOM OR CORRECTIONAL FACILITY IS THERE A MOTION. SPIN MOVE THEM PROPERLY SECONDED CNO DISCUSSION ALL IN FAVOR. OPPOSED RESOLUTION PASSES. OURS TWENTY EIGHTEEN FORTINO THREE SPONSORS PERJURING GILMORE APPROVES A GRANT CONTRACT BETWEEN THE METRO BOARD OF HEALTH AND THE BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY. TO ACHIEVE SAFE PLACEMENT OF ALL HEALTHY UNTREATABLE DOGS AND CATS LOCATED A SAFE COALITION MEMBER KENNELS AND DAVIDSON COUNTY IS THERE A MOTION. IT’S BEEN MOVED AND PROPERLY SECONDED CNO DISCUSSION ALL IN FAVOR. OPPOSED RESOLUTION PASSES. OURS TWENTY EIGHTEEN FOURTEEN OH FOUR SPONSORS VIRGIN GILMORE’S UPS A GRANT FROM FROM THE BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY TO THE METRO BOARD OF HEALTH. TO PROVIDE A PAY IT FORWARD BE WAIVED AND OCEAN. IT’S BEEN MOVED IMPROPERLY SECONDED CNO DISCUSSION ALL IN FAVOR. OPPOSED RESOLUTION PASSES ARE AS TWENTY EIGHTEEN FORTINO FIVE SPONSORS VIRTUE IN GILMORE APPROVES AN INTER GOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND THE METRO BOARD OF HEALTH. TO PROVIDE CHILD FATALITY REVIEW SERVICES IN THE SUDDEN DEATH OF YOUNG CHILDREN UNDER AGE NINETEEN INVESTIGATED BY THE MEDICAL EXAMINER’S OFFICE IS THERE A MOTION. IT’S BEEN MOVED IMPROPERLY SECOND IT SANDEL DISCUSSION ALL IN FAVOR. OPPOSED RESOLUTION PASSES. R. AS TWENTY EIGHTEEN FOURTEEN OH SIX SPONSORS VIRTUE IN GILMORE. APPROVES A CONTRACT BETWEEN INFILL MANAGEMENT IN THE METRO BOARD OF HEALTH TO OPERATE A MOBILE UNIT TO PROVIDE SERVICES TO WOMEN INFANTS AND CHILDREN IS THERE A MOTION. AND MOVED IMPROPERLY SECOND IT CNO DISCUSSION ALL IN FAVOR. OPPOSED RESOLUTION PASSES. OURS TWENTY EIGHTEEN FOURTEEN OH SEVEN SPONSORS VIRTUE IN GILMORE APPROVES A GRANT TO THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH TO THE METRO BOARD TO HELP. TO PROMOTE THE PROPER USE OF ALL RECOMMEND VACCINES IN RESPONSE TO THE VACCINE PREVENTABLE DISEASE IN COLLABORATION WITH THE CDC IS THERE A MOTION. SPIN MOVE THEM PROPERLY SECONDED ALL IN FAVOR. OPPOSE RESOLUTION PASSES ADAMA WITH THE I’M SORRY. OURS TWENTY EIGHTEEN FORTINO FOR SPONSORS VERDURE APPROVES A LETTER FROM THE MET METRO MAYOR TO THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OUTLINED IN THE METRO GOVERNMENT COMPLIANCE EFFORTS WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT IS THERE A MOTION. IT’S BEEN MOVED AND PROPERLY SECONDED COUNTS WOMAN ALAN. THANK YOU MADAM CHAIR I JUST WANNA MAKE SURE I UNDERSTAND THIS CORRECTLY BUT IF I READ THE LETTER RIGHT THERE’S AS A STATEMENT IN THERE THAT SAYS WE WILL BEGIN AN EVALUATION. OF SIDEWALKS TO MAKE SURE THAT THEIR ADA COMPLIANT EXCEPT THAT WE’VE BEEN THROUGH THIS PROCESS ONE SO. I JUST WANNA MAKE SURE I MEAN THE PURSE TIMES IS. WE FIX THE SIDEWALK AND THEN WE COME BACK AND FIX IT AGAIN AND WE FIX IT AGAIN IT’S KIND OF THE SAME PLACE. IS THERE IS THERE A WAY TO I MEAN I JUST MAKE SURE WE’RE NOT GOING THROUGH AND DOING THAT AGAIN BECAUSE THERE’S SO MANY NEW SIDEWALKS WE NEED TO BE BUILDING SO CAN SOMEONE. AND TELL ME WHAT WHAT WHAT WE’RE BEGINNING TO EVALUATE AGAIN AND IF THERE’S A WAY. TO TO SATISFY THIS BY MAKING SURE EVERYTHING FORWARD APPLIES TO THE NEW STANDARD CUSTOMER MORE BRING UP DIRECTOR STURDIVANT. THANK YOU GOOD EVENING — WE HAVE HAD AN ONGOING ADA COMPLIANCE PROGRAM SINCE TWO THOUSAND AND THREE AND IT REALL. IT HAS TWO MAIN PARTS WE BUILD ALL NEW SIDEWALKS TO MEET ADA AND THEN WE GO BACK AND TRY TO REPAIR AND FIX ALL THE ONES THAT DON’T AND SO. THE IT’S A CONSTANT PROCESS IT MIGHT IN SOME WAYS BE MISSTATED LIKE LIKE YOU SAY BUT WE’VE WE’VE HAD THAT ONGOING FOR YEAR- SO JUST TO CLARIFY THE MEANING. I GUESS IN PARTICULAR MAYBE LIKE THE NEW YELLOW THINGS ARE NEW AND SO. FIVE YEARS AGO WE FIXED AN INTERSECTION TO HAVE THE SOIL THAT WE NEEDED WHICH IS GREAT AND STROLLERS AND BICYCLES I MEAN IT’S IT’S IT’S NOT ONLY HELP THE ADA COMMUNITY IT’S BEEN BENEFICIAL FOR EVERYONE SO I THINK WE’RE ALL SUPPORTIVE OF THAT BUT THEN WE COME BACK. THE NEXT YEAR AND DO WHAT THE NEXT ENTERED IS AND AND DIFFERENT TO ME IT’S TO THE IT’S TO THE DETRIMENT OF NOT BUILDIN. THE NEW SIDEWALK THAT WE NEED SO THAT SOMEONE CAN ROT ON ON A DIFFERENT STREET [inaudible] OKAY — AT FROM TIME TO TIME THE THE THE STANDARDS DO CHANGE — WE ALSO — HAVE SIDEWALKS TO JUST SPEAK HAT ARE IN NEED OF REPAIR OR HAVE BECOME OUT OF COMPLIANCE. AND THEN WE HAVE A LOT WE HAVE THOUSANDS OF ENCUMBRANCES ON OUR SIDEWALKS. AND WE’RE TRYING TO SYSTEMATICALLY GO ABOUT FIXING THOSE I’M NOT SURE THAT ANSWERED YOUR QUESTION BUT NO THAT’S GOOD I WISH RIGHT — COUNCIL MEMBER WE WE FIRST TIME- BUT OFTEN TIMES THE STANDARD ENGINE IN THE CONDITIONS CHANGE. AND THIS ADDRESS SO MUCH DEVELOPMENT WILL THIS ADDRESS POLLS IN THE SIDEWALK BY ANY CHANCE — THOSE ARE CONSIDERED ENCUMBRANCES — OUR STANDARDS EXCEED THE EIGHT A FEDERAL ADA THE FEDERAL ADA ONLY REQUIRES THIRTY SIX INCHES. AND SO A LOT OF THOSE POLLS ARE PLACED ON THE SIDEWALK AND THERE THEY WERE — THEY PROVIDE THIRTY SIX INCHES BUT THEY’RE STILL ON OUR SIDE WALK SO WE WE ACTUALLY HAVE A A DIFFERENCE OF OPINION. WITH SOME OF OUR LOCAL UTILITIES ON THAT HALF APPRECIATE WHAT I MEAN IT’S GREAT TO GET ON ALL OF WORK AND SO YOU CAN. GET AROUND OR DOWN OR WHATEVER SO APPLAUD THAT BUT I WOULD I WOULD HOPE THAT WE CAN. CONTINUE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH WITH. CREATING MORE OPPORTUNITIES FOR PEOPLE TO GET PLACES OF A SUPPORT ESSENTIAL UNDERSTAND IT BETTER THANK YOU. THANK YOU SO MUCH COUNCILMAN COUNCILMAN ANDERSON. CHAIR BIRCHER DIRECTOR STURDIVANT MY QUESTIONS ARE KIND OF IN A SIMILAR VEIN IS ACCOUNTS LADY ALLEN’S — BUT I DID. WANT TO AND DO YOU USE REPAIR DOLLARS OR IMPROVEMENT DOLLARS OF STICKING RECENTLY — OF WESTERN AVENUE OR HARDING READ AND SO I DON’T KNOW IF WE GET KIND OF WE TALK ABOUT T. DIED AND YOU KNOW STATE STANDARDS AND LOCAL STANDARDS. YOU KNOW WESTON WAS — SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVED — AS FAR AS THE QUALITY OF THE SIDEWALK BUT ALL THESE AT CONFERENCES REMAINED AND SIDEWALKS WERE NOT WIDENED IN ANY WAY TO YOU. AND YOU KNOW I HAVEN’T GONE OUT THERE WITH A MEASURE TATE AND MEASURED THIRTY SIX INCHES BUT YOU KNOW I I KNOW PEOPLE THAT WALK THAT STRETCH I SEE PEOPLE WALK THAT STRETCH OUT. DRIVE PAST IT OFTEN — AND AND SO I JUST KIND OF ONE UNDERSTAND FROM A PRIORITIZATION STANDPOINT [inaudible] IF. YOU KNOW WHY I GUESS I’M WONDERING ARE WE MAKING IMPROVEMENTS TO SIDEWALKS THAT ARE STILL ENCUMBERED WHEN WE DO HAVE OTHER SIDEWALK SITTING AREAS THAT I KNOW NOT TO BE ADA COMPLIANT. IT DON’T HAVE ENCUMBRANCES THAT WE HAVEN’T AN IMPRESSIVE SO HOW WE KIND OF SET THE YOU KNOW I UNDERSTAND OUR PRIORITIZATION SYSTEM FOR NEW SIDEWALKS BUT I’M GUESS I’M NOT AS CLEAR FROM A POWER STATION SIMPLY ON OUR EXISTING. THAT BOX. OKAY WELL THAT’S THAT THERE’S A LOT OF INFORMATION THAT GOES INTO ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE HAVE TO DO IS THAT IF WE ARE AWARE AND WERE ON NOTICE THAT ONE OF OUR SIDEWALKS AS IN NON COMPLIANCE WE WERE OBLIGATED TO GO OUT. AND FIX IT SO. THEREFORE PUT ON NOTICE THAT WE HAVE HAVE TO RESPOND TO THAT. WE ALSO SYSTEMATICALLY — ARE SURVEYING THE WHOLE COUNTY AND WE ALSO RELY ON THE EYES ON THE STREET AND THE POLICE DEPARTMENT ON THE WATER DEPARTMENT. AND ALL THE DEPARTMENTS THAT — WITHIN METRO GOVERNMENT TO HELP US SPOT THOSE LCATIONS THAT. NEED TO BE FIXED SO THAT’S AN ONGOING. PROGRAM WERE ALSO AWARE THAT — THERE ARE A LOT OF ENCUMBRANCES- IN OUR SIDEWALKS AND AGAIN WE HAVE A DIFFERENCE OF HOW WE APPROACH THAT. THAN SAY ANY — US — ANY HAS HAS A RIGHT TO BE IN THE OR THE RIGHT OF WAY AND THEY’VE — AND IN THEIR OPINION THEY HAVE TO PROVIDE THIRTY SIX INCHES OF ADA CLEARANCE WHICH IS THE FEDERAL LAW OUR STANDARDS AND SIDEWALKS ARE USUALLY WIDER THAN THAT. AND SO. YOU KNOW WITHOUT. BEING TOO HARD ON THEM WE HAVE A DIFFERENCE OF OPINION THERE IT’S A STRUGGLE THAT WE CONSTANTLY WORK ON AND THEY WORK WITH US BUT WE OFTEN — COME TO THE DIFFERENCE ON THAT – BUT MY ANSWERING YOUR QUESTION I I APPRECIATE THAT I GUESS I WOULD JUST LIKE TO UNDERSTAND STILL YOU KNOW I KNOW FOR A VERY LONG TIME BECAUSE WE HAD THE CONSENT DISK. DECREE CITY WAS REALLY OUT OF BLACK FRANKLY ADMIT CERTAINLY APPRECIATE THE ADA CONCERNS BUT YOU KNOW 70% PREPARE 30% NEW. I THINK WE’RE APPROACHING NOW MORE OF A FIFTY FIFTY SIXTY FORTY BUT I GUESS IN MAYBE SOMETHING TAKE UP CHARGER RATHER THAN HERE IN — AND THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE BUT I’M JUST YOU KNOW FROM A COST STANDPOINT WE LOOK AT YOU KNOW WE’RE WE’RE PUTTING OUR MONEY FOR SIDEWALKS AT IN CAR WITH. COUNTS LADY ALLEN DID. IN AND MAKING EXISTING SIDEWALKS MORE ALL RIGHT — AND MORE USABLE ON EITHER I THINK SOMETIMES. THAT THAT’S A GREAT USE OF FUND- BUT IF WE DON’T YOU KNOW. DO IT IN SUCH A WAY THAT WE STILL GONNA HAVE TO COME BACK. CAT FORTY OUNCE HIM AND AND DO IT AGAIN SO — I GUESS I GUESS I’M JUST HOPING TO GET JUST A LITTLE MORE — UNDERSTANDING OF THIS PROGRAM GOING FORWARD BUT IN THE MEANTIME. I’LL TRY TO HAVE MORE INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE TO APPRECIATE THAT THANK YOU. THANK YOU SO MUCH COUNCILMAN THANK YOU DIRECT A START ON ST – FURTHER DISCUSSION ALL IN FAVOR. OPPOSED RESOLUTION PASSES WERE NOW ON BEALE’S ON SECOND READIN. WELL BL TWENTY EIGHTEEN TWELVE EIGHTY THREE SPONSORS MURPHY IN HENDERSON AMENDS THE METRO CODE TO RESTRICT THE USE THE PROCEEDS FROM THE SALE OF REAL PROPERTY OWNED BY METRO. I DO HAVE A LETTER FROM THE SPONSOR — COUNCIL LADY HENDERSON AND DO YOU KNOW IF SHE DID SHE HAVE AN AMENDMENT. DO YOU WANT TO MOVE THE AMENDMENT [inaudible] OKAY. THERE IS A MEETING — FOR ONE THERE’S A LETTER FOR A ONE MEDIUM DEFERRAL [inaudible] AN EMOTION. SPIN MOVE THEM PROPERLY SECONDED ALL IN FAVOR. OPPOSED. BILL IS DEFERRED FOR ONE MEETIN. B. L. TWENTY EIGHTEEN THIRTEEN FOURTEEN SPONSORS COOPER AND VERDURE ESTABLISHES A BLUE RIBBON COMMISSION CONSISTENT WITH THE ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR TWENTY NINETEEN SO IDENTIFIED GOVERNMENT INEFFICIENCIES COUNCILMEN COOPE. THANK YOU MADAM CHAIR — I APPRECIATE EVERYBODY’S WORKING ON GOING WORK WITH THIS — AND I JUST WANT TO RECOGNIZE AND THANK AND CONGRATULATE THE ADMINISTRATION ON THE NOMINATION OF FIVE NOMINEES WILL BE CONFIRMED TOMORROW NIGHT FOR THE BLUE RIBBON COMMISSION. AND IN AN EFFORT TO PROVIDE A STRUCTURE FOR THEM TO WORK — IN A COLLABORATIVE PROCESS BETWEEN THE COUNCIL AND THE ADMINISTRATION I WAS GOING. TO DEFERRED THE SPILL ONE MEETING. AND SOLICIT FURTHER — INPUT AT THE ADMINISTRATION HAS SAID HOW TO MAKE IT EVEN BETTER AND FROM THE COUNCIL ALSO — SO WITH THAT — A REQUEST ONE MEETING DEFERRAL ALSO I WILL NOTE THAT THE VICE MAYOR PLAYS A LARGE ROLE. IN THE STRUCTURING THIS COMMITTEE AND WE WILL HAVE A NEW ONE AT SIX THIRTY TONIGHT AND SO I’D LIKE TO GET. OUR VICE MAYOR INVOLVED ALSO THANK YOU. THANK YOU COUNCILMEN COOPER — THERE’S A MOTION FOR ONE MEETING DEFERRAL. IT’S BEEN MOVED AND SECONDED COUNCILWOMAN GALE MORE DISCUSSION ON THE ONE MEETING DEFERRAL. COUNCILMAN GIVE MORE DISCUSSION ON ONE MEETING DEFERRAL. I APOLOGIZE I WAS A TALKING ALSO COUNTS OF BUSINESS BECAUSE IT’S JUST A LOT GOING ON RIGHT NOW. YEAH I I DID HAVE A I GUESS SOMEONE TO SHARE WITH COUNCILMEMBER. COOPER THAT I WAS A GREAT IDEA I DID HAVE SOME — SOME I GUESS THINGS I JUST WANT TO BRING UP AND JUST KIND OF GO ON RECORD. JUST AT THE PEACE I’M NOT CLEAR ABOUT EVEN AFTER READING ANALYSIS AND I REMEMBER WHEN YOU BROUGHT IT UP THIS SUMMER AT THE BUDGET. IS ARE THESE RECOMMENDATIONS I’M NOT CLEAR ABOUT HOW MUCH WEIGHT THEY HOLD AND WITH THIS HAVING THE CONSULTING IF YOU COULD JUST SPEAK. TO THAT THAT’S THE PART I’M STILL NOT CLEAR MICHAEL WITH THANK YOU CANCEL LADY YOU’RE OBSERVANT AS ALWAYS — AS WE’RE EVOLVING THIS COLLABORATIVE PROCESS I THINK WITH THE CURRENT VERSION AND I WHEN I ENCOURAGE EVERY. COUNCIL PERSON TO CONTACT MYSELF FOR THE VICE MAYOR OR THE BUDGET AND FINANCE CHAIR. IS — FOR REALLY SUGGESTIONS. TO COME FROM A WIDE VARIETY OF SOURCES. AND THEN FOR THESE SUGGESTIONS TO BE VETTED BY THIS COMMISSION PROCESS. SO THAT WOULD INCLUDE PEOPLE FROM FINANCE FROM PEOPLE FROM LEGAL. TO SO THAT HOPEFULLY AT THE END OF THIS PROCESS THE COUNCIL WILL BE PRESENTED WITH WELL THOUGHT THROUGH. POTENTIAL IDEAS NOW THERE MAY B. THERE MAY BE NO IDEAS THAT SURVIVED THE SCRUTINY BUT THEN THERE MAY BE IDEAS THAT ARE VALUABLE TO THE PUBLIC AND CREATING A MORE EFFICIENT AND RESPONSIVE GOVERNMENT — IN THIS IS TO AVOID AS WE TALKED ABOUT LAST JUNE THE JUNE PROBLEM WE GET TO JUNE. WE WE WOULD LIKE SOME SPENDING CHOICES SOME SAVING CHOICES AND WE HAVEN’T DONE THE HOMEWORK TO KNOW IF THEY’RE REAL OR NOT REAL SO THIS IS. STARTING THAT WORK EARLY SINCE – NEXT YEAR IS CLEARLY ENGINEER ALSO. TO START TO WORK EARLY AND HAVE A VERY PROFESSIONAL PROCESS BEHIND IT AND AGAIN I WANT JUST WANT TO THANK THE ADMINISTRATIO. FOR THE OUTSTANDING NOMINEES THAT THEY HAVE PUT FORWARD IN DOING THIS AND THEN AGAIN I THINK WE HAVE. TO WE HAVE TO DECIDE OURSELVES IN THE NEXT TWO WEEKS HOW. WE WANT TO RECEIVE THAT NEWS. HAVE A FOLLOW UP SO THEN — FOR THIS THEN I’M THINKING I LIKE THAT IDEA LIKE THE WAY IT IS GOING PERHAPS THEN THE COUNCIL COULD. OF RANK SOME OF THE ISSUES SINCE THE BUDGET IS A MORAL DOCUMENT – THAT ARE IMPORTANT TO THEM IS I FEEL LIKE SOME OF THE ISSUES THAT THEY WOULD LOOK AT IF THEY ONLY LOOK AT IT FROM A FISCAL. STANDPOINT THAT IT MAY BE SOMETHING THAT’S IMPORTANT BUT WE KNOW THAT IS. BASICALLY IT MAY NOT. RETURNED. MAN I HAVE THE RETURN THAT WE THINK IT WOULD HAVE ONLY LIVED IN. BASICALLY BUT IF YOU LOOK AT IT MORALLY AND FISCALLY IN THE OVERALL GOOD OF THE COMMUNITY YOU MAY HAVE A DIFFERENT TAKE ON IF WE RANKED AND PRESENTED IT. WILL ABSOLUTELY IT’S UP TO THE COUNCIL AND THE MAYOR TO PASS THE BUDGET RIGHT — AND THAT IS A MORAL DOCUMENT I COMPLETELY AGREE WITH YOUR OBSERVATION THIS IS JUST PER PROVIDING CHOICES DISCRETE BUILDING BLOCKS. FOR WHAT MAY ALLOW SOME WE COULD GO FOR EXAMPLE TO EMPLOYEE PAY — BUT AGAIN INSTEAD OF GETTING TO JUNE AND ALSO NEEDING THAT WE NEED TO DO THAT HOMEWORK THAN THE START EARLY AND TO AND AND I’M I’M VERY EXCITED ABOUT EMPLOYEES THEMSELVES POTENTIAL BEING A SOURCE OF THESE IDEAS — COUNCIL MEMBERS — PEOPLE FROM THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY TO STARTING EARLY BECAUSE AGAIN I THINK AND WE’LL BE HAPPY NEXT SPRING THAT WITH THIS PROCESS HAPPENED. BUT THIS COMMISSION DOES NOT. PASS ANYTHING. UNDER THE SUBSTITUTE THAT WAS WRITTEN IT WOULD CONCEIVABLY DO A RECOMMENDED NEUTRAL OR NOT RECOMMENDED SCREENING. BUT ALL OF THOSE ITEMS WOULD END UP BEFORE THE COUNCIL AND ONLY THE COUNCIL AND THE MAYOR CAN PASS A BUDGET SO I GUESS I’M ASKING IN THAT CAN THERE BE SOME THINGS TO THAT WE SAY WE JUST WILL NOT — TOUCH OR LOOK AT YEAH THERE OTHER THINGS THAT WE WILL NEED US EXCELLENT AND THIS IS I THINK SOMETHING IF YOU DON’T MIND VINTON ACTIVELY DISCUSSING AND AND PUTTING OUT IN THE NEXT COUPLE WEEKS CURRENTLY. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS AND COMPENSATION IS IS EXCLUDED FROM THE FORMAL SET OF TOPICS. IN PART BECAUSE THIS WHOLE EXERCISE IS TO FIND MONEY. IDEALLY FOR EMPLOYEES ALSO THE SALE PUBLIC LAND AND PART WE HAVE A SEPARATE PROCESS GOING WITH THAT AND IT’S VERY EASY TO SAY WELL WE’LL JUST SELL SOME LAND TO DO IT. THAT THAT PROBABLY NEEDS. TO US NOT RESORT TO THAT TO THAT AND THEN ACTIVELY I THINK ONE OF THE REASONS THIS IS BEING DEFERRED. IS PERHAPS SCHOOL SHOULD BE EXCLUDED RIGHT — FROM THAT AND SO BECAUSE WE DO NEED TO FIND MONEY BUT AGAIN [inaudible] TO HELP. THE COMMITTEE BEFORE FOCUSED I THINK IS A GREAT THING AND AGAIN THIS IS THIS IS NEW TO HER FOR US THIS IS A COLLABORATION BETWEEN EVERYBODY — BUT AGAIN I I ALL OF THIS — YOU’VE BEEN HERE LONGER THAN I HAVE COUNSEL LADY — BUT YOU DO GET TO THE BUDGET PROCESS. AND THEN THERE’S JUST NOT ENOUGH TIME WASN’T STAFF TO IS IT LEGAL CAN YOU DO THAT WHAT WOULD IT SAY DOES IT HAVE AN UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCE SOMEWHERE ELSE. AND SO ULTIMATELY THIS IS RELYING ON THE PROFESSIONALISM OF THE MAYOR’S APPOINTEES AND THE COUNCIL. ARE TO BEGIN WORKING WITH FINANCE AND LAW AND THE MAYOR’S OFFICE ITSELF TO DECIDE WHETHER- THERE. VIABLE IDEAS TO BE PRESENTED TO THE COUNCIL AND THE MAYOR’S OFFICE WHEN YOU GET TO IT NEXT YEAR. I LIKE IT I LIKE IT A LOT I LIKE THE IDEA OF SCHOOLS PENSION. TENSIONS LAND IN OUR PROS IS A NATIONAL METRO GENERAL HOSPITAL AT X. EXCELLENT ALSO THANK YOU THANK YOU. THANK YOU COUNSEL WOMAN COUNTS MY PROBLEM. FOR THANK MADAM CHAIR. AS RELATED TO CANCEL A GILMORE’S QUESTION THAT. IN THE PRESENTATION OF THE BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE — THAT WE HAD THE OTHER DAY. MADE SOME FABULOUS IDEAS AND IS A GREAT PRESENTATION BUT DURING THAT PRESENTATION. PLEASE REFRESH MY MEMORY DID%-pS FAR AS EXEMPTING OR DID THEY JUST GO AFTER. NOT GO AFTER BUT REVIEW EVERYTHING IN SIGHT AND SHOW WHERE. THE THE THE MONEY WAS LEAKING FROM MORE FOR WHERE THERE COULD BE SOME ADVANTAGES AS TO RESTRUCTURING. THEY REVIEW TO A HOLISTIC APPROACH. THEY DIDN’T INCLUDE — EXEMPTIONS THEY REVIEWED EVERYTHING SO I JUST WANT TO BE CAREFUL I KNOW WE’RE NOT EVEN THERE YET. I JUST WANT TO COUNSEL BE CAREFUL. THEY WERE IT WAS IT’S A GREAT IDEA AND IT SOUNDS LIKE IT’LL WORK WELL IF WE START PUTTING A LOT OF RESTRICTIONS ON IT. THEM WE’VE DEFEATED THE PURPOSE SO I JUST WANNA MAKE THAT STATEMENT THANK DEFINITELY NOT A COUNCILMAN [inaudible] COUNCILMAN ANDERSON. WHEN THE TECH CONCUR WITH COUNCILMAN PROD MORE I DON’T THINK WE SHOULD BE PUTTING EXCLUSIONS ON THIS I THINK IT SHOULD BE JUST AS OPEN OBJECTIVE FAIR PROCESS I COULD KERR A BUDGET IS A MORAL DOCUMENT BUT THAT IS ON US WHEN WE GO TO PASS THE BUDGET? TO SET THOSE PRIORITIES AND EXCLUDE THINGS ARE INCLUDE THINGS AT THAT TIME BUT WE WANT THIS. GROUP OF CITIZENS AND OTHERS — TO TO JUST APPROACH THIS OBJECTIVELY AND ALL ACROSS THE BOARD IN MY VIEW SAP. A SUPPORT THE PROCESS BUT I WOULD JUST ENCOURAGE THANK YOU. THANK YOU SO MUCH COUNCILMAN HENDERSON. SEE A NOTICE FURTHER DISCUSSION- THIS BILL HAS BEEN AS A MOTION ON THE FLOOR FOR ONE MEETING DEFERRAL ALL IN FAVOR. OPPOSE BILL IS DEFERRED FOR ONE MEETING. BL TWENTY EIGHTEEN THIRTEEN NINETEEN SPONSORS MENDEZ AND VERDURE AMENDS THE MATCH FOR COLD REGARDINGTAX INCREMENT FINANCING. IS THERE A MOTION. COUNCILMAN AREAS — THANK YOU AT LARGE. I NEED TO MOVE AN AMENDMENT ON THIRTEEN NINETEEN BUT FIRST I WANT TO JUST PROVIDE A LITTLE CONTEXT. SO THIS ONE IN THE NEXT — ONE THE THIRTEEN TWENTY BOTH GO- TO TALK ABOUT TAX INCREMENT FINANCING AND THEIR DIFFERENCE IN THAT THIRTEEN TWENTY WHAT AMANDA SPECIFIC EXISTING. REDEVELOPMENT PLAN THE RILEY CHILL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND UNDER THE TERMS OF THAT PLAN ANY AMENDMENT WOULD RE JAY’S APPROVAL ALSO SO WE GET. TO THIRTEEN TWENTY I’M GONNA BE MOVING TO DIFFER AND TO REFER ATTENDEE HA SO THEY CAN CONSIDER THE AMENDMENT HOWEVER ON THIRTEEN NINETEEN WE DON’T NEED EM DH IS APPROVAL — THIRTEEN NINETEEN IS SIMILAR TO THE FREE FORM THAT WE DID IN — TWENTY SIXTEEN IN TWENTY SIXTEEN WE AGREED — AMONG OTHER THINGS TO HAVE AN INCREASED REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND WE DECIDED FOR NEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING THE LOANS GOING FORWARD WE’RE GONNA SET ASIDE — FOR METRO TO KEEP THE QUOTE THAT SERVICES TAXES SO AFTER WE PASS IT IN TWENTY SIXTEEN FOR NEW — TO LOANS — IT WOULD BE EIGHTY FIVE CENTS OUT OF EVERY DOLLAR OF INCOME AND BE WOULD BE AVAILABLE FOR THE NEW LOANS AND WE DECIDED — THAT IT WAS IMPORTANT THAT WE KEEP THE DEBT SERVICES PIECE OF THE 15% THIS BILL — THIRTEEN NINETEEN WOULD — I EXPAND ON THAT PRINCIPLE AND HAVE METRO ALSO KEEP THE SCHOOLS FUND A PORTION OF THE TAXES. WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY THIRTY ONE CENTS OF EVERY DOLLAR OF INCOME AND THE REASON BEHIND DOING THIS ABOUT — METRO STAT — WERE ABOUT TO GO OVER FOUR AND A HALF MILLION OF GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT AND IN THE HAND OUT ICE PUT AROUND FOR EVERYBODY OUT DEBT PER CAPITA. OF THE FIFTY LARGEST CITIES IN AMERICA — WERE NOW NUMBER — TWO SANDWICHED BETWEEN NEW YORK CITY AND CHICAGO NOW WE TRULY HAVE MADE NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL CITY — WE’VE DONE IT ON ON THE BACKS OF LONG TERM DEBT THAT DOESN’T HAVE TO BE GOOD OR BAD — BUT IT IS TRUE — AND THE FUNDAMENTAL QUESTION IS WHETHER WE’RE GOING TO CONTINUE TO POUR AS MUCH GASOLINE ON THE DEVELOPMENT FIRE — AS WE HAVE BEEN OR WHETHER WE NEED TO FEATHER THAT BACK SO WE CAN PAY YOU — FOR THAT EXTREMELY HIGH PER CAPITA DEBT THAT HAS US NUMBER TWO AFTER NEW YORK AND BEFORE CHICAGO — I WOULD ARGUE THAT ESPECIALLY NOW AT THIS POINT WHERE THE SCHOOL SYSTEM AS A LINE ITEM IN THEIR BUDGET THAT’S ABOUT — TO GO OVER TO THEY PAY — DEFINED TAX AGREEMENT FINANCING THAT IT’S TIME TO TAKE THE SCHOOLS FIND PORTION OUT. AND THAT’S THE WHAT THIRTEEN NINETEEN WOULD DO — COUPLE OTHER — PIECE OF INFORMATION THAT BECAUSE TENACITY WITH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT THIRTEEN NINETEEN IS A MANDIBLE — AND THIRD READING SO AFTER I GET A HOPEFULLY THIS AMENDMENT — INTRODUCING APPROVED I’M GONNA BE MOVING FOR APPROVAL ON SECOND READING WITH THE RE REFERRAL TO A BUDGET AND FINANCE. AND WITH THAT — MANAGER I WOULD I WOULD MOVE THE AMENDMENT THAT’S IN THE PACKAGE IT’S IT’S A HOUSEKEEPING ITEM TO FIX — A TYPO I MADE IN [inaudible] COUNCILMAN DO YOU WANT TO YOU WANT TO SAY OKAY WE’LL GO AHEAD AND AND VOTE ON THE AMENDMENT — THERE’S A MOTION TO MOVE THE AMENDMENT ALL IN FAVOR [inaudible] OPPOSED. NUMBER ON THE BILL AS AMENDED COUNTS MOMENTOUS. SIDE I WOULD MOVE THE THE BILL AS AMENDED. WITH A REFERRAL TO BUDGE AND FINANCE SPIN MOOD IMPROPERLY SECOND IT WITH THE RE REFERRAL BACK TO BUDGET AND FINANCE COUNCIL WOMAN ALAN. THANK YOU MADAM CHAIR I WANT TO THANK COUNCIL MEMBER MENDIS FOR THE CLOTHES WHAT SHE KEEP IS ON THIS AND THE GREAT EXPLANATION BECAUSE THIS IS THE THE MOST CLEAR WAY OF HAD THE SCHOOL PAYMENT EXPLAINS — AND I APPRECIATE THAT SO COUPLE QUESTIONS FIRST OF ALL — ON THIRD READING WE’RE LOOKING AT B. L. TWENTY EIGHTEEN THIRTEEN FIFTEEN WHICH SETS UP A STUDY IN FORMULATING COMMITTEE. TO LOOK AT HOW TIFF IS DONE AND TO GIVE US AN EVALUATION WOULD IT WOULD IT BE APPROPRIATE TO WAIT TO GET. THE RESULTS OF THAT COMMITTEES – RECOMMENDATIONS BEFORE WE CONTINUE TO DO OTHER. OTHER CHANGES TO TIFF AS IT IS NOW. COUNCILMAN DAVIS THANK THANKS MADAM CHAIR BOMB I THINK THE ANSWER’S NO — I THINK THAT — THIS LITTLE THAT DASHBOARD THE WERE WAY BELOW WHERE WE WANT TO BE ON OUR SAVINGS ACCOUNT WERE – SECOND HIGHEST OF THE FIFTY BIGGEST CITIES IN AMERICA ON OUR DEBT PER CAPITA WERE OVER AND ONCE WE GET THE UPDATED NUMBERS OVER THREE BILLION AND UNFUNDED- RETIREE BENEFITS. OUR DEBT SERVICE AS A PERCENTAGE OPERATING BUDGET HAS. PASSED I THINK SKYROCKETS AFFAIR NORTHWARD UP ABOUT 5% OR I GUESS UP. FIVE PERCENTAGE POINTS IN THAT COMESOUT TO ABOUT A 50% INCREASE OVER THE LAST FIVE YEARS — IT JUST COMPLETELY SET IS SETTING ASIDE THE REVENUE BOND THAT WERE OVER FOUR BILLION. ON OUR GEO DAT ING AND WERE WE WE CONTINUE TO TALK OR TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT AS THE WAY THE THE FUTURE AND IF WE EXPLODE THE NUMBER OF TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS AND NATIONAL WE SIMPLY. CANNOT GIVE — ALL THE MONEY — FOR THE INCREMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT LOANS WE NEED TO LEAVE SOME FOR METRO — WE ALREADY DECIDED FEW YEARS AGO TO LEAVE THAT THAT SERVICES TAXES I’D MAKE THE ARGUMENT THAT SCHOOLS ARE AT LEAST AS IMPORTANT AS THE THAT SERVICES TAXES WE NEED TO LEAVE THE WE ARE TODAY IS NOT WHERE WE WERE THIRTY FIVE YEARS AGO AND HAVE STARTED. THE CITY IS AN INTERNATIONAL CITY WE BORROWED OUR WAY INTO BEING AN INTERNATIONAL CITY. AND IT’S TIME THAT WE USE — KEEP THE SCHOOLS FULLY FUNDED I’M SURE THERE’S GOING TO BE OTHER GOOD IDEAS THAT COME OUT OF THE STUDY IN FORMULATING GROUP BUT THERE’S NO REASON TO DELAY FOR THIS — I WOULD NOTE THAT — WE CAN TALK ABOUT IT THEM SOME MORE FOR THIRD READING IF WE WANT TO KEEP TALKING ABOUT IT — BUT FOR SECOND READINGSINCE IT IS A MANDIBLE ON THIRD — I’D SAY THAT WE SHOULD GO AHEAD AND PASS IT ON SECOND. COUNCILMAN ELENA STILL GOT MORE QUESTIONS AS THIS IS SO COMPLEX OKAY SO — TWO MORE QUESTIONS MAYBE SOMEONE FROM ANTI HA CAN EXPLAIN HOW THEY REPAY THE LOANS AND IF WE TAKE 46% OF THE INCREMENTS DO THEY STILL HAVE TO PAY IT BACK AND HAD HIS HEAD IS AT WORK. I THINK THEY’RE DECIDE NOW WHO’S GONNA IF I MAY MANAGER GO AHEAD COUNCILMAN DAVIS — THEY’RE COMING UP THOUGH THE THE ANSWER IS PRETTY CLEAR IT WILL REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF LOANS IT CAN BE MADE SO WHERE IS A PROJECT. MIGHT QUALIFY FOR A TEN MILLION DOLLAR TO FLOW NOW THERE BE LESS MONEY AVAILABLE FOR THE LOAN PAYMENTS SO THE LOAN PAYMENT THE LOAN AMOUNT AND SO THE TIME MIGHT BE SIX MILLION THERE’S NO QUESTION ABOUT THAT — THE QUESTION IS WHETHER AS A CITY IS ABOUT HE’D — TO KEEP — FINANCING PROJECTS TO THE SAME EXTENT THAT WE HAVE OVER THE LAST THIRTY FIVE YEARS. THANK YOU JOKING WITH MD A CHEC- CALCIUM MENDEZ I THINK DID A SPOKE WITH HIM.WERING THAT WE- LAST WEEK — ABOUT ABOUT THE CONSEQUENCES OF OF REDUCING EARLY REDUCING THEM OUT OF INCREMENTS — WE DO FEEL STRONGLY THAT. THERE SHOULD BE A LOOK AT TAX INCREMENT FINANCING IN ORDER TO DO IT SAID TO BE MORE TRANSPARENT BE ABLE. TO RECOGNIZE WITH THE PUBLIC AND GET A GOOD UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT TAX INCREMENT IS ABOUT. THAT BILL ON THIRD READING THAT YOU MENTION WERE FULLY IN SUPPORT OF THAT IT HAS A CLOCK TICKING ON ON THAT BILL TO GET A REPORT BACK TO METRO COUNCIL WITHIN SIX MONTHS. WE WOULD LIKE TO WAIT FOR SIX MONTHS BEFORE ANYMORE DECISIONS ARE MADE UPON THAT SO THAT YOU WE CAN LOOK AT JUST SO SINGS COUNCIL MENDEZ SAID. HOW MUCH GAS DO WE WHAT I WANT TO PUT ON THIS HOW MUCH GAS WHO WANT TO TAKE OFF OF THIS? AND IT IS THAT’S A GREAT ENDEAVOR THE PEOPLE THAT HE ISN’T THAT IS RECOMMENDING. AND THAT. AFTER WE LOOK AT THAT DO WE CAN DECIDE BECAUSE IF WE TAKE THIS OFF OF THIS TABLE FOR THE NEXT SIX MONTHS AND THERE ARE NO. TAX INCREMENT WE HAVE A TAX INCREMENT. FINANCING APPLICATION PROCESS THERE ARE NO TAX INCREMENT FINANCING APPLICATIONS IN THE IN THE IN THE IN THE WORKS RIGHT NOW WE HAVE NONE THAT HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED TO US OR KNOW OF ANY THAT ARE COMING IN TO US. AND WE THINK DOING THIS SIX MONTH WAIT AND AND REVIEW AT THAT POINT TIME. WE MAY GO IN AND OPEN UP IN A MINUTE MULTIPLE THINGS ABOUT REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND ABOUT HOW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING WORKING WE REQUEST THAT YOU WOULD. DIFFER ON THIS BILL UNTIL THAT SIX MONTH STUDIES DONE. COUNCILMAN OUR OKAY THAT. I’M I’M GETTING CLEAR AND THEN THE FINAL QUESTION IS WHY IN THE WORLD DO WE DO IT IN THIS GOOFY WAY I MEAN WHY WHY DO WE PUT THIS MONEY INTO THESE FUNDS AND THEN TAKE IT BACK OUT AGAIN WHY DON’T WE HAVE A SEPTIC MEAN. ARE REQUIRED BY LAW NOT TO JUST HAVE A TO A FUN WE’RE ALL THE TEETH MONEY GOES IN MBA DOESN’T HAVE TO GET IT BACK FROM. AND THAT THAT MAY BE THE ULTIMATELY THE SAME THING AS WHAT WE’RE DOING NOW BUT CAN SOMEONE ON THE LEGAL TABLE. EXPLAIN THAT THESE TO ME DIRECTOR COOPER. THOSE ARE QUESTIONS THAT I ASKED FRIDAY ACTUALLY — MARKET DARLENE I MET WITH FINANCE TO KIND OF TALK THROUGH THE MECHANICS OF HOW THINGS ARE DONE AND WHY THEY’RE DONE — I THINK A LOT OF IT IS THAT’S THE WAY WE’VE ALWAYS DONE IT. ANSWER AND SO. WE ARE LOOKING AT ET AL HOW THAT’S DONE FROM A MECHANIC STAMPS SO WE HAVE OPTIONS AND AND CHANGING THE MECHANICS. POTENTIALLY POSSIBLY POSSIBLY OKAY THAT’S THAT’S HELPFUL. OKAY — I MEAN TO ME IT AT THAT APPRECIATE EVERYTHING COUNCILMEMBER MENDEZ IS DOING BECAUSE HE’S REALLY GOT A A GREAT UNDERSTANDING THIS BUT IT IT DOES SEEM LIKE WE MAY BE ABLE TO LEARN SOMETHING FROM STUDY IN FORMULATING SO I WOULD- JUST A FOR CONSIDERATION MAYBE THIS READING OR THE NEXT TO THINK ABOUT WAITING TO GET THAT INFORMATION. THANK YOU SO MUCH — COUNCILMAN ALLEN COUNTS MOMENT AS JUST TO ON THAT LAST LITTLE EXCHANGE I WANT TO BE. CLEAR AND THE LANGUAGE IS BEING USE THE WE COULD TALK ABOUT THE MECHANICS OF HOW THE MONEY FLOWS TO THE METRO BUDGET BUT THT DOESN’T CHANGE THE FACT THAT. THIRTY ONE CENTS OF EVERY DOLLAR OF INCOME WHY IS HE GOING TO THE SCHOOL SYSTEM SO WE COULD THEORETICALLY ELIMINATE SEEING AND BLACK AND WHITE TYPE THE FACT THAT NINE AND A HALF MILLION DOLLARS IS GOING FROM THE SCHOOL SYSTEM — TO ADMIN PS BUT IF WE MADE THAT MORE OPAQUE BY JUST HAVING A DIRECT APPLICATION OF THE MONEY FROM — PROPERTY TAX REVENUE STRAIGHT — AND DHEA THE FACT WOULD STILL BE THE SAME IT’S STILL MONEY COMING OUT OF THE THE I MEAN. THAT’S WHAT WE ALL DECIDED IS TO HAVE. INVESTMENTS IN DEVELOPMENT LOANS RATHER THAN STUFF FOR METRO. AND THEN — THIS IS AMENABLE ON THIRD READING I THINK WE CAN KEEP TALKING ABOUT IT I WOULD REQUEST THAT MY COLLEAGUES GO HEAD PASSES ON SECOND READING. I THINK IT’S A GOOD BILL GREAT JOB COUNCILMAN AT LARGE IF YOU MAKE YOUR MOTION. MOVE OUT BREAM MOVED TO APPROVE AS A MATTER OF THE RE REFERRAL TO THE BUDGET FINANCE. THANK YOU SO MUCH CNO FURTHER DISCUSSION ALL IN FAVOR. OPPOSED. YOU GOT THAT MONIQUE. OKAY. BILL IS A I FORGOT WHAT THE MOTION OF APPROVED AS AMENDED AND RIVER. FOR BILL TWENTY EIGHT ST THIRTEEN TWENTY ACCOUNTS. SPONSOR MANDATE IS APPROVED AN AMENDMENT TO THE RUTLEDGE HERE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN. IS THERE A MOTION REMOVED SPIN MOVE REMOVE THEM PROPERLY SECONDED ACCOUNTS MOMENT IS — AS I MENTIONED — WITH THE LAST BILL ON THIS ONE TO A MAN AND A DEVELOPMENT PLAN REQUIRES BOTH THE APPROVAL OF ANTI HA AND THE COUNCIL. IN THAT ORDER — SO — PASS FIRST READING AT THIS POINT IS APPROPRIATE. MOVE TO TO FOR SECOND READING WITH REFERRING AT TWO AM D. HA FOR CONSIDERATION AN HOUR I GUESS I’D ASK TO HAVE IT DEFERRED TILL THE FIRST MEETING IN DECEMBER TO GIVE THEM TIME TO CONSIDER IT. I DIDN’T MEAN TO HAVE THAT SOUND LIKE A QUESTION THAT’S A OKAY. I’M SORRY SO I WAS LOOKING. OKAY THERE WAS A MOTION TO DEFER AND THEN RE REFER TO MD HA YEAH THAN THAN THE DEFERRALS TO THE FIRST MEETING IN DECEMBER FIRST MEETING IN DECEMBER HAS BEEN SECONDED. CNO DISCUSSION ALL IN FAVOR. OPPOSE BILLS DIFFER IN REFERRED TO ME MD HA TO THE FIRST MEETING IN DECEMBER. BEFORE WE ADJOURN — I WANT. TO INVITE EVERYONE ON BEHALF OF A VICE MAYOR ELECTION WOMAN — TO HIS SWEARING IN CEREMONY AT THE FARMERS MARKET. ALSO WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU KNOW AS A COMMITTEE AS A BODY THAT WE KEEP ON THE CAROLINAS AND OUR PRAYERS AND OUR THOUGHT- AS THEY AND YOU WERE AND RECOVE- FIRM FROM HURRICANE FLORENCE SO WITH THAT WE ARE ADJOURNED

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *